Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-24-2009, 11:46 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 216
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Yeah, but it's 0W/20, not 30. I'd be more concerned with leaking $6/qt. oil than some possible gas savings when cold over the 5W/30. I tried the 0 before and where the leaks were acceptable with the 5W, the 0 leaked REALLY bad. Didn't notice any difference in gas mileage between the two, so I switched back to 5W/30 with that car and subsequent ones and can't say anything bad about it per my 250k tear down (because of a damn $12 valve). The 5W protected extremely well from New England winters to 100 mph+ in the summer desert, J-turns, high engine speed with low car speed sliding around in snow or dirt, and plenty of other high temp abuse.

Oh, wait I see you corrected the weights.


Last edited by evolutionmovement; 05-24-2009 at 11:55 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-24-2009, 01:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
My Goal: 35 MPG All Day
 
RandomFact314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 684

1NZ-FE (Year 1) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
Last 3: 34.02 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 2) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 33.32 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 3) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 35.32 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 4) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 34 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Year 5) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 26.87 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Years 6,7,8) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 28.6 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Years 9,10,11) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 27.8 mpg (US)

1NZ-FE (Years 12,13,14) - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
90 day: 33.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 36 Times in 25 Posts
Well it seems to me out of all the comments, by best bet is to just stick with the 5W30 synthetic oil because it's "best all around"

Last edited by RandomFact314; 05-24-2009 at 01:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 02:08 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 850
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Don't drop the lead number.

Stevey is right(if not long winded lol).

The first is what viscosity the oil is cold. The second is its ability to flow hot. As long as its not really cold there or like I said you don't come screeching out of your parking space or drive way it won't matter.

The upper number 5w30 is the important part. Dropping it down will not result in more leaks(because it doesn't leak at 5 obviously. . .) It will be easier to flow. And no you don't want heavier oil for sure. When it gets too hot it won't lubricate your cylinder properly becauses the molecules are too fat and they don't flow over each other very well.

Either stick 5w30 or drop to 5w20. the 20 will net you savings on the highway because its much less difficult to move the piston(trust me), and it shouldn't cause excessive wear. But the savings are minimal. Its hard for you to push the heavier oil. . .but your engine doesn't care or hardly notices.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 03:11 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 240

Jalilah - '07 Chevrolet Cobalt LT
90 day: 40.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunchosen View Post
Don't drop the lead number.

Stevey is right(if not long winded lol).


Sorry about the long winded-ness. It's an issue i'm working on as a person. Or so my therapist says.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 04:11 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 850
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Lol its fine. I just summarized for people just looking for an answer that didn't really care for specifics.

I do it depending on the topic and if I get excited about it lol.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 04:15 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 240

Jalilah - '07 Chevrolet Cobalt LT
90 day: 40.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Getting back on topic. I would consider running 0W20 once the warranty on my car expires. The slightly thinner oil would result in cooler temps, and more oil flow. And better fuel economy.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 06:02 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 850
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
mm. . .I would go with the 5w20. . .the 0 will leak out faster.. might spring an oil leak and cause catastrophic problems. . . besides. . .the 0 will only help out in really cold weather and when you first start. . .so for 2-3 minutes every trip

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
conventional, oil, synthetic, temperature, temps



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effect of gear oil viscosity on transmission efficiency (Metro owners take note) MetroMPG EcoModding Central 44 12-09-2014 12:22 AM
Oil change recommendations? rjacob EcoModding Central 48 08-02-2010 06:04 PM
Article: Crude oil is getting cheaper — so why isn't gas? Frank Lee The Lounge 20 07-14-2010 02:06 AM
Book report: The Last Oil Shock by David Strahan AndrewJ The Lounge 0 01-17-2008 12:55 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com