Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2012, 07:01 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 587 Times in 401 Posts
The 4-cylinder Tibby with the auto is a pig. The auto has incredible drivetrain losses and saps a lot of power out of the motor.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 08-07-2012, 12:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 389

2003 Ninja EX250 - '03 Kawasaki Ninja EX250
90 day: 78.57 mpg (US)

Saturn - '99 Saturn SL1 Base
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
I use a vacuum gauge in my saturn. Every acceleration event is between 1900-2400 RPM (the meat of the torque curve for the engine) at a vacuum reading of 2-3 inHG. With P&G and EOC, and a 55mph cruise speed, I average 48mpg in my saturn.
Doing my part to reduce dependence on OIL
Doing my part to reduce congestion
And enjoying it!

If you have to use your brakes, you are driving too fast!

My 101.5 MPG 2003 Kawasaki Ninja 250

Crude Oil Price Today
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 05:19 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by star_deceiver View Post
Do not let them GIVE you this car!!!!! You will never see an end to the problems! I've known several people who've owned said model, including my Mom... IMO get something else!

Agreed. I've heard bad things about these cars as well. I've had a few friends with the 2.7 V6 however and as someone into performance cars i must say for the size of the motor they're really not bad and i've never seen any of my friends have problems with these. This is not the case with the newer 06 & up I4's though no complaints heard about those.

Either way back to the original idea i believe the engine load not only depends on the car but nowadays you must take induction into the matter too ie. Turbo/supercharged It really depends on your vehicle for example for my two babies
04 CLK55 Cabrio. I prefer 40-45% throttle around town
76 El Camino, 55-60%

(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2012, 12:01 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
AbeisAverage's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 29

Second time's the charm - '04 Honda Accord EX
90 day: 24.26 mpg (US)

Tengu - '11 Mazda Mazdaspeed 3 sport
90 day: 19.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
well it doesn't matter so much now, the saab had a turbo so I was wondering about that for a while but it's out of commission now. I now drive a honda accord that's 4 cyl so the whole 70-80% load makes sense again. It seems a bit slow to me but I was driving a 6 cyl malibu for a couple of weeks which load was being displayed oddly. And as I said before that I had the saab which was also 4 cyl but it had a turbo and 25 more horses. I am getting the best mpg in the honda and it's just a nice car period. I hope I'll be driving it for years to come.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

engine load, scanguage

Thread Tools

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com