Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-20-2016, 12:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
KrautBurner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SUNNY Sequim, Wa
Posts: 239

Cavalier of D00M - '05 Pontiac GTO LS2 T56
90 day: 23.2 mpg (US)

The New One - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 51.55 mpg (US)

Chick Magnet - '91 Geo Metro 3cyl/5sp
90 day: 48.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
Question what are these stuck on Aero thingies?

I've seen this guy on the way to work for a couple years.
kinda curious what these things are and if/how they work?

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Aero.JPG
Views:	144
Size:	124.8 KB
ID:	20278  
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)

1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base

2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)

1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-20-2016, 12:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
You somehow missed all the conversations about air tabs?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Xist (07-20-2016)
Old 07-20-2016, 12:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
KrautBurner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SUNNY Sequim, Wa
Posts: 239

Cavalier of D00M - '05 Pontiac GTO LS2 T56
90 day: 23.2 mpg (US)

The New One - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 51.55 mpg (US)

Chick Magnet - '91 Geo Metro 3cyl/5sp
90 day: 48.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
You somehow missed all the conversations about air tabs?
yes,
mr 11,xxx posts, I have missed all the OLD conversations about something that I have never seen or known what to call them
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)

1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base

2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)

1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 12:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
KrautBurner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SUNNY Sequim, Wa
Posts: 239

Cavalier of D00M - '05 Pontiac GTO LS2 T56
90 day: 23.2 mpg (US)

The New One - '10 Toyota Prius II
90 day: 51.55 mpg (US)

Chick Magnet - '91 Geo Metro 3cyl/5sp
90 day: 48.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
thanks FRANK LEE
even though you were being a condescending ass, you did help me by providing a term to look up

Airtab | Aerodynamic Fuel Savers | How Airtabs Work


they claim that they can help with more than just fuel

Quote:
Spray Reduction and Stability

Drivers report improved mirror visibility in rain or snow conditions yielding safer lane changes and better visibility for other road users. Improved stability and handling in windy conditions is reported by all drivers. This reduces driver workload, stress and fatigue

Road Grime Reduction

Because Airtabs™ alter the airflow at the rear of the vehicle, the partial vacuum there is reduced. There is less accumulation of road grime or snow. Less road grime means advertising remains more visible and the company’s image is enhanced. Less snow build up means less weight to haul and conspicuity tape, tail, running and brake lights, especially low temp LEDs, stay visible longer.
__________________
2005 GTO 6.0 V8 (600hp)

1991 Geo Metro 1.0 3/5 base

2010 Prius II (replaced 2001 Tahoe 5.3 V8 April 2014)

1994 F-350 7.3 TurboDiesel (Rollin' Coal)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 12:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I am always here to help. Remember that you ungrateful snot.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
mcrews (07-20-2016)
Old 07-20-2016, 12:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
They're vortex generators. It is considered by some, myself included, to be a fad device. The most effective aspect of the design is to make money for the people selling them. They have legitimate uses on aircraft, but on ground transport no one has really shown them to have a great effect, if any.

They are purported to help maintain attached flow longer to help reduce drag, or to allow the air to fill in the void behind a vehicle faster thus reducing drag.

2 basic things working against them are:

They are purported to create a turbulent boundary layer which helps to create attached flow...well, all ground vehicles have a continuous turbulent boundary layer, there really isn't laminar flow on ground vehicles. And that's OK.

There is a huge volume of air that is affected by the passing of a vehicle through it, it is NOT just the air rushing over the 2 inches above the surface of the vehicle that is moved about but several 10's of feet of air around it and many hundreds of feet behind that all matter. The VG's are essentially blades of grass in a hurricane breeze and really cannot alter enough of the flow of air in such a way as to make a difference.

Search "vortex generators" here in ecomodder, the subject has been thoroughly hashed out several times.

Like HHO, this is a subject of often contentious debate. I only hope it leads you to further try and learn the basics of aerodynamics so you can understand that these are kazoos trying to be in the Philharmonic.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
KrautBurner (07-20-2016), niky (07-26-2016), Xist (07-20-2016)
Old 07-20-2016, 12:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
Well I see the contentiousness is faster than my lousy ability to type. I thought I was going to be the first to answer.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
mcrews (07-20-2016), Xist (07-20-2016)
Old 07-20-2016, 12:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
Come on guys. Be nice.
__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 01:06 PM   #9 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
That is Frank Lee being nice.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
darcane (07-21-2016), elhigh (07-20-2016), Frank Lee (07-20-2016), freebeard (07-21-2016), Gasoline Fumes (07-20-2016), mcrews (07-20-2016), niky (07-26-2016), samwichse (07-28-2016)
Old 07-20-2016, 01:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Lolz!

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com