02-25-2021, 05:25 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
|
What woud be the ,optimum car nose shape given what is known about air curtains, undertrays, etc?e
Starting with a clean piece of paper and given what is known about air curtains, undertrays, nose stagnation and compression of airflow, etc., and given conventional car shape, what would such a face look like?
In other words, if Hucho, Julian Edgar, NASA nerds, and the best minds of Porsche, BMW, Audi, Toyota, and Ferarri all got together with the best minds on this website, what would they come up with, vis most efficient car nose shape?
Last edited by Otto; 02-25-2021 at 05:26 PM..
Reason: typo
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-25-2021, 06:22 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,702
Thanks: 8,146
Thanked 8,925 Times in 7,368 Posts
|
It depends on the design brief/use case. Things like lighting, cooling,etc. The big one is driver sight-lines. A flat windshield at 90 degrees to sight-line is best, sloped and curved windshields are subject to refraction and glare.
The example uses flat faceted panes, while the rest of the body can be compound curved. The two forward facing hexagons could be flattened, enabling a Luigi Colani spinning windshield wiper. The front wheels are held back where leading and trailing spats are possible. The overall form is your nominal solar racer inflated for interior volume.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-25-2021, 11:50 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: sequim,wa
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
Probably a Halibut shape....
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gingwhaa For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-26-2021, 02:10 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,702
Thanks: 8,146
Thanked 8,925 Times in 7,368 Posts
|
Boxfish
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
02-26-2021, 10:15 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,187
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,809 Times in 1,973 Posts
|
I guess it's a fair question.
Design by committee is how the camel got designed though.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
|
|
|
02-26-2021, 12:11 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
|
most efficient
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto
Starting with a clean piece of paper and given what is known about air curtains, undertrays, nose stagnation and compression of airflow, etc., and given conventional car shape, what would such a face look like?
In other words, if Hucho, Julian Edgar, NASA nerds, and the best minds of Porsche, BMW, Audi, Toyota, and Ferarri all got together with the best minds on this website, what would they come up with, vis most efficient car nose shape?
|
It dates to World War-I.
It was on a British warplane, with forward machine gun position, and pusher-prop. They hadn't figured out yet, how to synchronize shooting bullets through the rotating propeller.
Anyway, Hucho called it both 'Optimum' and 'Ideal'. The 1922 Jaray and Klemperer basic bodies use it, Walter Lay used it in 1933, Kamm did research with it in 1935, Schl'o'rwagen 1938, Lancia Aprilla by Pininfarina 1944, 1978 Hucho basic body, SMART Fortwo, Aston Martin Cygnet, many many others have used it.
If you're not going to skirt the front wheels, then the air curtains are a palliative to the drag created by the open wheel arches.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
02-26-2021, 03:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,702
Thanks: 8,146
Thanked 8,925 Times in 7,368 Posts
|
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
02-27-2021, 11:18 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,425
Thanks: 540
Thanked 1,205 Times in 1,063 Posts
|
Putting it bluntly: nose shape has relationships with width, height and maximum vehicle length. Naca found that a 2" radius nose on their laminar semi symmetrical series was required for the laminar flow but mostly for stall conditions. As illustrated by the F104 wing, things get squirrelly really fast in a sharp edge wing at stall. The template addresses having a decent passenger compartment and a front mounted engine with that ugly profile otherwise you need lay flat passengers and a pancake motor.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-01-2021, 03:34 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
|
There is no one "ideal". If there were, it would be universally used by now.
There are a ton of different constraints that an automotive shape has to satisfy. And each choice made in one affects the possibilities for other choices. As was mentioned, the air curtain thing is pretty meaningless if you have covered or spatted wheels. And if you want more air going under the car, the nose shape will be different than if you want less going under the car. And don't forget cooling ducts and exhausts.
It gets complicated in a huge tearing hurry, and it depends rather a lot on just about every factor going into the car's design.
We have seen "good" noses, more than likely "good enough" ones, such as the well-known Template. But there isn't really any "best" one, IMHO.
-soD
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to some_other_dave For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-17-2021, 01:01 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
|
Nose flow smoke imaging
MetroMPG took my raw video from 2014 and created: 'Streamlined Toyota T-100 In the Wind Tunnel'.
It's right here at EcoModder.com
If you haven't seen it, it may be of value. It's got the WW-I nose on it. In 1976, Hucho called it 'Optimum', 'Ideal.'
It could use some of the airdam shaved off, maybe 25mm or so.( Unnecessary downforce ). Other than that, I'm pleased.
On some vehicles, the nose constitutes only 5% of overall drag.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|