07-29-2013, 09:19 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
I assume your whole drive was up and down the i5 through WA state which is ridiculously slow compared to almost anywhere else in the country I've driven. I'm glad I don't have to drive up there anymore, the low speeds and fast lane campers are really irritating. I just did LA to SF in 5 hour flat and still got 41mpg. I'm not going to waste an extra hour of my life just so I can get 44 or 45mpg. Its not worth it.
I bet you filled up in Bellingham or Blaine on that cheap American gasoline before crossing the border back into Canada
Last edited by tjts1; 07-29-2013 at 09:54 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-29-2013, 09:29 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101Volts
Pity the man who has a blowout at 75 MPH!
|
I had a blow out, well a tire valve stem failure going about 80 on the down hill side of some mountian picking up speed to get over the next one. I was in the suburban, loaded down with tools pulling my trailer.
That tire is still in use, the suburban and trailer are still in one peice.
As long as you are not driving a ford explorer and don't panic you will be fine.
Years before that I had 3 firestone tires tread seperate on me at varrious speeds at different times.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 08:52 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506
Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US) Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US) M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base 90 day: 18.73 mpg (US) R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd 90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 936
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
I had a blow out, well a tire valve stem failure going about 80 on the down hill side of some mountian picking up speed to get over the next one. I was in the suburban, loaded down with tools pulling my trailer.
That tire is still in use, the suburban and trailer are still in one peice.
As long as you are not driving a ford explorer and don't panic you will be fine.
Years before that I had 3 firestone tires tread seperate on me at varrious speeds at different times.
|
Hm, Thanks. There's a lot that I don't know, Though I still think I'd feel better about having a blowout at or under a speed limit than over it.
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 10:42 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: syracuse,ny
Posts: 45
Thanks: 17
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO
Since I have been conscious of how I use my fuel, and have changed my habits somewhat, the more I see how oblivious others are about most other aspects of driving well with others too.
|
Quoted for truth!
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 10:55 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101Volts
Hm, Thanks. There's a lot that I don't know, Though I still think I'd feel better about having a blowout at or under a speed limit than over it.
|
You can get killed getting out of bed in the morning. Turn off the hysterical "news" channel of your choice, relax a bit and get over yourself.
How many blowouts have you had? Per 100,000 miles traveled? How many blowouts have people you know had... per 100,000 miles traveled?
I've never had a blowout, but I have had flats. Been okay. I've had other mechanical failures. I'm more likely to pick up a winning powerball ticket from the gutter than I am to have a blowout in a situation that I can't recover from. I'm taking more of a risk putting money in my 401k than I am when I'm driving.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 11:23 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Southeast
Posts: 5
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
...Because we can. Let's face it, the modern highway system was designed for high speed and modern cars have evolved to the point that most everyone feels safe driving seventy or eighty miles per hour. That's the reason for speed climbing and when all the traffic is ignoring the posted speed limits, enforcement is futile and arbitrary - and mostly to collect revenue, anyway.
Enforcing an artificial limit just would create bottlenecks and even more traffic jams. So the future will bring extremely aerodynamic cars capable of cruising all day at a hundred with excellent fuel economy. I see ecomodding as a means to a performance end, not just a lifestyle choice. I could see having a brutally fast hypercar in the stable and next to it an ultra-lightweight aero 100mpg car. Both have their place and reason for being. Just don't expect everyone to go along with computer driven jelly beans speed limited to 55.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Aguila1 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-31-2013, 05:54 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aguila1
Just don't expect everyone to go along with computer driven jelly beans speed limited to 55.
|
Wouldn't 80mph top end speed suffice though? I mean theoretically we are talking about Diesel engines with HP in the teens able to accomplish this already. It seems sensible that allot of people would want to trade excessive speed capabilities for efficiency if given the option.
|
|
|
07-31-2013, 05:55 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Then explain pickup sales.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
07-31-2013, 06:03 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie
Then explain pickup sales.
|
I'm not saying the majority of drivers won't be interested in bigger, faster, stronger. But there are people that value efficiency quite highly and even in the "pickups" sector might make their decision based on the efficiency of options available.
|
|
|
07-31-2013, 06:53 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Yes, there are people... you, me, the EMers, and maybe another handful.
|
|
|
|