Window Screen as a Skin Material

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by kach22i

I love the architectural connection in that first video.

A previous patent quote:


I think that the patent works minimizing the strength of separation because the pressure is lower, and not higher across the screen material.

aerohead


Perhaps the lack of pressure and adherence to the surface is not an issue because the air will still flow along a surface which in parallel appearances is solid, and not perforated as it looks to be at right angles.

It is still healthy to question, right?

I'm sure aerohead is right, and that failed experiments don't get published as often as successful ones, so we might not find about about this concept that way.

However I think it may be worth doing at least a hair dryer experiment, if nothing else to get it out of my system so I can move on.

'strength of separation' is not language common in aerodynamic literature.There may have been a translation problem,but a jury would take the claimant to task for using such a term.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow adhesion and pressure would be paramount to streamlining capabilities.They undergird the vary premise of streamlining.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow would travel along a porous surface only if it were airtight and 'dead' below the surface.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flow would have no trouble with a fabric as rip-stop nylon,Dacron sail cloth,etc.,and especially doped cloth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions are always good!