02-07-2008, 04:15 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
MPG...what?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 145
Terkle - '97 Toyota Tercel Whitehawk 90 day: 40.91 mpg (US) Bubble - '10 Toyota Yaris base 90 day: 41.88 mpg (US) Deva - '13 Chevrolet Spark LS 90 day: 39.82 mpg (US) Malibu5 - '82 Chevrolet Malibu Classic 90 day: 17.61 mpg (US) Highlander - '06 Toyota Highlander Limited 90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
wow, picked up 2mpg out of nowhere
just filled up the Cavy tonight, 11.554gallons, 335.9 miles 29.08 MPG!!!
the car normally averages low to mid 27s with 26s when i goof around
i didn't do anything special, or different then usual, that i know of, tracey thinks it may be because we didn't use the heat as much this time...i don't see how that can make a huge improvement, we don't usually use it a whole lot anyways to begin with
the only thing that makes sense to me, is possibly the computer learned the additional airflow from the ram-air & K&N filter...possibly
__________________
-Greg...the exhaust freak.
-06 Highlander 3.3awd
-10 Yaris sedan
-97 Tercel, 1NZfe swapped
-96 Tercel
-82 Malibu 1UZfe swapped
-19 Fit (wifey ride)
www.pipedreamsfab.com
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 04:17 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 124 Times in 91 Posts
|
Well, FE economy is just one of those things. I mean, look at my fuel log, it can be all over. Perhaps you're just more unconscious of ecodriving,
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 04:28 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
MPG...what?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 145
Terkle - '97 Toyota Tercel Whitehawk 90 day: 40.91 mpg (US) Bubble - '10 Toyota Yaris base 90 day: 41.88 mpg (US) Deva - '13 Chevrolet Spark LS 90 day: 39.82 mpg (US) Malibu5 - '82 Chevrolet Malibu Classic 90 day: 17.61 mpg (US) Highlander - '06 Toyota Highlander Limited 90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
i dunno man, all i know is that i hope it continues this 29mpg streak
__________________
-Greg...the exhaust freak.
-06 Highlander 3.3awd
-10 Yaris sedan
-97 Tercel, 1NZfe swapped
-96 Tercel
-82 Malibu 1UZfe swapped
-19 Fit (wifey ride)
www.pipedreamsfab.com
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 10:30 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boo Town, MD
Posts: 129
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
I don't know if this has anything to do with it, but in Maryland it has been raining a bit recently. I have noticed a slight gain in mileage while it is raining compared to when it is dry.
__________________
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 11:23 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
UnderModded
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 319
Pablo - '07 Hyundai Santa Fe AWD 90 day: 23.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
You'll know on the next tank.
__________________
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 11:34 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
the only part of useing the heat that would affect your gas mileage is the blower fan, a vehicles heat comes from waste heat from the engine, and that is "free" altho running the blower fan puts an electrical load on the engine, not a great big one, but enough of a load that it can affect engine idle speed.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 12:26 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Until the engine is fully warmed up, running the heat will hurt your mileage. Cold engine = less mpg. Running the heater will slow the warming process, so more time is spent with the engine cold. Even having the temp set to heat, without any fan, will take some heat from the cooling system.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 05:03 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
"Even having the temp set to heat, without any fan, will take some heat from the cooling system."
I've been told it's not enough to matter. There will be a small amount of heat exchange but I'd wager it's peanuts, unless maybe in something like a Metro 3-banger that has a hard time heating up anyway.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 05:10 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
I'd have to agree with you both. During warm up, I think its beneficial to not run heat to get the fastest warm up. However, once it is warmed up I see no problem with blasting as much heat into the cabin as you want. I don't think you'll see much of a decrease in effeciency as the engine is already producing tons of excess heat.
|
|
|
02-07-2008, 05:17 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
I've been told it's not enough to matter. There will be a small amount of heat exchange but I'd wager it's peanuts, unless maybe in something like a Metro 3-banger that has a hard time heating up anyway.
|
... or a 4-banger civic with aluminum block. With a complete grille block and the heater temp set to Cold, it takes all of my 11-mile commute to get up to temperature. It's 10-20 degrees colder if I have it set to heat, even with the fan off. Fan on, even colder.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
|