Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2008, 02:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 150

Silver Bullet - '02 VW Golf TDi
Thanks: 5
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
www.fueleconomy.gov

Pretty interesting website actually: http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm

The real reason I bring it up is that while looking for the official EPA fuel economy figures for my Golf ('02 TDi 5-sp), I noticed that they have a "new" and an "old" procedure. To see it, click on the "Compare to Official EPA Window Sticker MPG" link (opens new JavaScript window).

In other words, how will this new procedure impact the 35 mpg requirement being phased in? My Golf was credited with a combined 45 mpg under the "old" EPA standard (and actually got that or better right from new). According to the "new" standard it should only have gotten about 38 mpg. Does that mean that the "new" 35 mpg standard is really 42 mpg by the "old" standard?

Also, does that mean that the old fleet average of 26 mpg was really 19 mpg under the new standard? If so, that implies the new standard of 35 mpg will raise fleet standards not by 9 mpg (35-26=9), but by 16 mpg (35-19=16).

Kind of a sneaky way to go about it...but I'm okay with that!

__________________
Best tank ever: 72.1 mpg in February 2005, Seattle to S.F.
New personnal best 'all-city' tank June '08 ... 61.9 mpg!
Thanks to 'pulse-n-glide' technique.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-13-2008, 04:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Very good point If the timing was better - I'd agree it was sneaky But either way - it's pointing in the right direction.
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 05:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Turbo gas guzzler
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lexington
Posts: 67

grocery getter - '03 Mitsu Evolution
90 day: 17.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ive been using that sight for 6-9 months. After gas made one of its large jumps last summer, my shop started getting lots of gas mileage complaints. 75% of the people were telling me "it used to take $20 to fill a tank, now it takes $30." I then had to do the math for them, and finally was able to tell them that they were getting the same mileage. :shakeshead:
I then found this website so that I could tell them what was "normal" and the fact that their erratic driving was the difference. I always thought that figuring out gas mileage was a simple thing, but apparently the common driver isnt able to understand what "miles per gallon" means. :shrug:
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2008, 05:54 PM   #4 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The common driver ceases to amaze me!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2008, 06:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
The original Highway and City tests are still in use for CAFE. No change there.

In 1985, the numbers were adjusted down about 15%, to make the ratings more "realistic". Still the same test, just reported with an adjustment factor.

In 2008, 3 more tests are added. High-speed (70mph, harder accel), Hot (hi-temp, AC), and Cold (same city test, just colder temps). These are averaged with the old tests (adjusted) and reported on the sticker. Approximately 15% extra reduction.

So, the CAFE 35mpg means a 85-2007 epa rating of about 29.8, or a 2008+ rating of 25.3.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml

__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com