Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2023, 03:03 AM   #31 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,747
Thanks: 7,791
Thanked 8,596 Times in 7,079 Posts
Have you trimmed it back yet?

You could decide the shape before you move on to new materials. Simple curves are easy, compound curves are more efficient.

Stitch-and-glue plywood, or Polymetal composite, less messy than fiberglass and foam.

__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-23-2023, 11:55 AM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,908
Thanks: 23,993
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
'VW vortex.com'

It looks like something made to 'sell', which has nothing to do with aerodynamics.
Ernie's 'Beetle Wing' will be the better investment.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2023, 04:31 PM   #33 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
I thought that the new Bug had a Cd of 0.45? The curve in the rear is way too steep. I doubt it has attached flow as far down the back as the picture shows...
Welcome razordave. The New Beetle has pretty poor aerodynamics as you are aware. The biggest problem is the rounded roofline leading into a too steep back glass. I am including a drawing from another thread. It shows attached flow all down the trunk. What it doesn't show is the two counter-rotating vortexes coming off the C pillar. That is where much of your drag comes from. I think your Kammback is a good start if you can make it strong enough for everyday use.

FWIW, I tuft tested my windshield and the air flowed down and forward where the wipers are. I don't think you will notice much difference by covering the cowl or removing your wipers.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to COcyclist For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-07-2023), razordave (12-05-2023)
Old 12-05-2023, 08:18 PM   #34 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Fort Myers Fl
Posts: 113
Thanks: 111
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
I believe the response I saw to that particular drawing was doubtful.

I finished a bunch of mechanical work on the car and the result was +2 mpg.

Could have been egr delete and straight pipe? I have all new brake calipers and hoses
That still need installed but hopefully I'll be able to get back to aero mods.

I also added instrumentation.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	20231205_193132.jpg
Views:	4
Size:	81.9 KB
ID:	34412  
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2023, 11:15 AM   #35 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
If you do the EGR delete, make sure you set aside some time to do an intake manifold cleaning. I made it to 110,000 miles before I did mine but it was a mess.

__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com