Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2011, 11:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 279
Thanks: 90
Thanked 240 Times in 90 Posts
Aerocap Thesis from 2009

Found another Engineering students Thesis on aerocaps I thought you guys might like to review.

There are some nice CFD graphics and a curved Aerocap was found to reduce the Cd the most. The fuel efficiency gain comes out to about 1 mpg in the calculations derived from the students CFD simulations.

I have experienced a higher percentage of fuel efficiency gain at around 3 mpg or 15% at sustained freeway speeds. Round.boater has seen a 15% increase also in the fuel efficiency of his truck since running an Aerolid, which he has recorded in his fuel log here on ecomodder.

round.boaters fuel log

http://ecomodder.com/forum/em-fuel-l...vehicleid=2565


In the last paragraph of the thesis, on future work, the student states a need to test an aerocap on a truck in the real world along with other aerodynamic devices.

Link

http://csus-dspace.calstate.edu/xmlu...pdf?sequence=1


Bondo


Last edited by bondo; 01-22-2011 at 12:03 AM.. Reason: addition
  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bondo For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-22-2011), BamZipPow (01-22-2011), slowmover (01-22-2011), t vago (01-21-2011), The_Original_Modifier (12-29-2011)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-21-2011, 11:39 PM   #2 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...nice to read about the 3" and 6" height front air dams too!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 11:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 279
Thanks: 90
Thanked 240 Times in 90 Posts
Yes it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...nice to read about the 3" and 6" height front air dams too!
I also like that different angles of the aerocaps were simulated. 12 degrees looks to be the best.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 11:43 PM   #4 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 830
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Dang me... My cap was indeed too aggressive. I had a 20 degree downangle. The coefficient of lift for 18.77 degrees increased by 63% over the baseline, in that paper. No wonder my aerocap flew!

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 12:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 279
Thanks: 90
Thanked 240 Times in 90 Posts
Yeah t vago, lift is good for aircraft, bad for aerocaps.

The wind tunnel tests I did on my Aerolid in the A2 wind tunnel in North Carolina showed a significant increase in lift too. My lid is around a 12 degree slope. The students thesis shows a reduction in lift, at 12 degrees, which does contradict the data derived from test on my lid in the A2 wind trunnel.

Last edited by bondo; 01-22-2011 at 12:07 AM.. Reason: spelling
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 07:18 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
Would adding tailplates lower the cd on the 3D aerocap?

>
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 09:54 AM   #7 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 830
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
Would adding tailplates lower the cd on the 3D aerocap?

>
I can definitely tell you with 100% certainty, that the answer to your question is a firm and definite maybe.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 12:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
excellent read !
although I did notice here was not much variation between a standard aerocap @ 10 vs @ 12. however, the angled cap did provide a much greater difference over both straight 10/12.
going by that study, the best gains would come from a front air dam @ 6" coupled with the curved (angled) aerocap.
which also makes me feel much better since that was the direction I was going to take with my Ranger prior to trading it
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 05:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
angles

I sure wish we could get away from 'angles'.Angles don't occur in high-performance structures,only compound curvature.
One can only discuss a particular angle,tangent to the body curvature,at any particular point,not some general area of the structure.
The folks did a lot of work.And the values are appropriate for their model,nothing else.They've essentially re-discovered Paul Jaray's work of 1922.
One would be warned if they believed any fast and hard rules would apply to these results when extrapolated out onto the general pickup truck population.
Sure,compound structures are the most complicated forms,most difficult to create tooling for,most expensive.But if you want the best quality fluid flow over a structure,you're hard pressed to beat them.
And if you ever intend to have all available kinetic energy transformed back to static pressure,and achieve lowest drag,you're pretty much locked in to using these forms.
Anywhere,except the automotive industry,will you find anything but these complex forms being used to eek out every bit of available energy when moving structures though fluids,be they gases or liquids.
Okay,rant over.Thanks Brett.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 08:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
A good read, all the way through.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com