Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2008, 05:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Waikele, Hawaii
Posts: 108

88CRX - '88 CRX Standard DX
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IS250 - '07 IS250
90 day: 25.79 mpg (US)

RX300 - '00 RX300
90 day: 18.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
CRX Mugen Wing?

I think this is a mugen style wing:


Do you guys think it will decrease Cd?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 08:42 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '011 Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 61 Times in 39 Posts
I might help. Worst case it'll change nothing.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 09:15 AM   #3 (permalink)
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 179

The White Car - '84 300td
90 day: 28.84 mpg (US)

The Blue Car - '86 535i
Last 3: 23.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think it'll make it worse due to the wraparound sections on the sides.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 09:36 AM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,914

Blackfly - '98 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 67.07 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 107.11 mpg (US)

U.F.O. - '00 Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 83.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 239
Thanked 848 Times in 471 Posts
It won't do much with that sunroof open!

The side portion shouldn't hurt, provided it follows the existing body taper (or is slightly more tapered). Hard to tell from the pic, but it looks like it at least follows the existing lines.
__________________
Latest project: removable Geo Metro boat tail
Latest test: Massive cardboard air dam on a Geo Metro


www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 12:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,414

Vegan Powa! - '91 CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 81 Times in 67 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy Send a message via Skype™ to SVOboy
The mugen wing does follow the existing lines...I've always wanted one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 01:04 PM   #6 (permalink)
Veggiedynamics
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 680

Extreme CRX-HF - '87 CRX custom areo
90 day: 50.8 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
it will extend the tail out a bit making a very slight angle decrease to the hatch .. doubt you'll see a big difference but looks basically like a kammback mod.. on a tamer scale.. couldn't hurt
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2008, 03:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin
Posts: 145

Silver Bullet - '03 Protege LX
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)

The Golden Turd - '01 Grand Caravan Sport
90 day: 16.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IF the wraparound sections follow the body lines, I would say it could only help by a negligible margin.

IF the horizontal piece follows the body line, its kammback properties might be negated by the increased wetted flow area. Remember, the purpose of a kammback is to reduce the amount of drag by to eliminating surface area.

IF you want it 'cause it looks cool, GO FOR IT, 'cause it's not hurtin anything significantly

IF you're justifying the purchase by saying it'll save you gas, it will probably take like four years to pay for itself if it even helps at all

=P

IMO it looks pretty cool.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 01:07 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Waikele, Hawaii
Posts: 108

88CRX - '88 CRX Standard DX
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IS250 - '07 IS250
90 day: 25.79 mpg (US)

RX300 - '00 RX300
90 day: 18.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks for the input. If i find a used one I'll try to get it.... they seem really rare.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 06:35 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,607
Thanks: 870
Thanked 636 Times in 372 Posts
Mugen Wing

My thought is that since it's Mugen,it was built for "performance".Since it has no up-sweep it should not induce drag and my guess is that they're using it to move the low pressure wake underneath it to create a little downforce,without the drag penalty.Since it increases the fineness-ratio a tad that's also not bad.It's a perfect fit,it doesn't block your vision,could show a smidge better on fuel,I'll vote,keep it!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 10:48 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Waikele, Hawaii
Posts: 108

88CRX - '88 CRX Standard DX
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IS250 - '07 IS250
90 day: 25.79 mpg (US)

RX300 - '00 RX300
90 day: 18.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
My thought is that since it's Mugen,it was built for "performance".Since it has no up-sweep it should not induce drag and my guess is that they're using it to move the low pressure wake underneath it to create a little downforce,without the drag penalty.Since it increases the fineness-ratio a tad that's also not bad.It's a perfect fit,it doesn't block your vision,could show a smidge better on fuel,I'll vote,keep it!
Thanks, but i haven't got it... only thinking of getting it, only if i get a good deal


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which CRX? seanof30306 EcoModding Central 8 02-10-2009 06:52 PM
Opinions: CRX HF, Honda Insight or Keep Suzuki Swift? dunhamjr General Efficiency Discussion 17 06-18-2008 06:14 PM
non-op '85 CRX, or '91 civic hatchback SirKeats EcoModding Central 1 05-16-2008 05:21 PM
1st gen crx hf watson EcoModding Central 13 03-17-2008 01:16 PM
CRX HF transmission swap paulwelkins EcoModding Central 2 02-02-2008 06:52 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com