Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-15-2010, 10:49 AM   #11 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,752

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,339
Thanked 751 Times in 477 Posts
Comptiger, so assuming I have a 195°F thermostat, then if I hypermile around without exceeding 80°C (175°F), then my engine will be in small loop mode (no coolant going to radiator) the whole time? Is that OK for the engine?

Would there be any effect in replacing the thermostat with a higher temp unit if my fan kicks in at 95°C (203°F)?

__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-15-2010, 11:19 AM   #12 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
I would say if you have plenty of power and a precise method of measuring intake temps, it would be a worthwhile experiment.
Could be an interesting experiement. I have power to spare really (big engine, little car) so I could try this. Does an SG measure intake temps or more importantly log them ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 11:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Your t-stat is probably a 195*. Unless you can bump the fan engagement up to about 210*, I wouldn't change it to a higher temp, as the fan would be on constantly.

Running it cooler with EOC so you're under 195* does keep the cooling loop small. Just let it get up to full temp every few weeks or so for at least 10 minutes of runtime to mix up all the coolant again, and it should be fine.
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2010, 01:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Diesels like cold air.

Lets do a thought experiment. Imagine you have two identical cylinders. One cylinder with 100 grams of air and a cylinder with 110 grams of air. For now lets assume the starting air temperature is the same. Now imagine we add the same amount of heat energy to each cylinder. Some of the energy is going to be transferred through the cylinder wall to the coolant and the rest is going to be transferred to the air. It stands to reason that the air temperature of the cylinder with 110 grams of air will not get as hot because the heat energy is heating more mass. Since the cylinder with 110 grams of air will not get as hot less heat energy will be transferred through the cylinder wall to the coolant and we can extract more of the remaining energy from the air.

Advantage cylinder with more mass in it

Now imagine you have two identical cylinders with 100 grams of air in them. Lets assume that the air temperature in one is 20 degrees C less than the other. Now imagine like before we add the same amount of heat energy to each cylinder. Just like before some of the energy is going to be transferred through the cylinder wall to the coolant and the rest is going to be transferred to the air. It stands to reason that the air temperature of the cylinder that was 20 degrees C lower than the other one won't get as hot because we are heating the same amount of air with the same amount of energy. Since the cylinder that was 20 degrees C lower than the other one won't get as hot less heat energy will be transferred through the cylinder wall to the coolant and we can extract more of the remaining energy from the air.

Advantage cylinder with colder air in it

Now with a cold air intake you get more air in the cylinder and its colder, thus its a win win with a diesel.

This holds true until you cool the air down enough that fuel won't ignite due to temperatures being to low a top dead center. People may argue that since diesels have trouble starting in the winter engines are close to that already but this is not the case. The main reason diesel engines have trouble starting in the winter is the fuel is cold and doesn't atomize well because its more viscous. That is why they thin diesel fuel out in the winter.

There are other reasons why a cold air intake is better as well but these are the two main reasons that are easiest to grasp
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ConnClark For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (07-16-2010)
Old 07-15-2010, 10:06 PM   #15 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
Quick and simple question - WAI for a Diesel - good idea or not ?
Like some other modifications the answer depends on engine loading and your particular combination and driving conditions.

If you always hypermile with very light engine loading, then the warm air will help your fuel efficiency.
If you often load the engine and need more power, then you will want the cooler air.

For many cars this question comes down to the type of driving done. If you're mostly stop-n-go, then it's likely that you'll need the extra power. If you're mostly highway cruising, then you'll likely benefit from the warm air.

Testing each way thoroughly is the best way to determine what your vehicle wants.

Everyone's situation is different, and that's why you'll often get conflicting answers to these types of questions.
__________________
#####################################
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 12:24 PM   #16 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by white2001s10 View Post
If you always hypermile with very light engine loading, then the warm air will help your fuel efficiency.
Got any scientific studies to back this up?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 12:48 PM   #17 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
Got any scientific studies to back this up?


Yes.
__________________
#####################################
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 12:52 PM   #18 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by white2001s10 View Post
Yes.
lets see them
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 01:09 PM   #19 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
I'd like to see any SAE (or other) testing that shows how IAT effects diesel efficiency.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2010, 01:09 PM   #20 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
lets see them
I'm not going to fall for your fishing any more than you would fall for me asking you to show your scientific data showing that air temperature has no effect fuel efficiency.

The way that you come across in your post is that you simply would not believe when I did show you, and I can understand that.
Hence my statement in the post above:
Quote:
Testing each way thoroughly is the best way to determine what your vehicle wants.
Now, if you want me to walk you through a revealing test procedure that you can perform to get repeatable results on your own vehicle, thus giving you your own applicable answers, then I will.

I've done my own controlled testing 20 years ago. I have all of my data, but I'm not here to convince anyone, nor am I obligated to answer to anyone. You will always be better off, and more satisfied, if you perform your own testing.

As I indicated above, different vehicle combinations respond differently, and also to different conditions. Differences in engine loading can come down to factors like different drivers, or where the driver lives. That's why I gave a general answer, but then suggest individual testing to confirm. I had hoped that would've been clear.

__________________
#####################################
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 27 11-20-2022 05:24 PM
Cold air VS Warm Air Intakes - what's the difference? deadman1474 EcoModding Central 63 03-22-2019 10:53 AM
Spark ignition Diesel engine, AKA your car mechman600 EcoModding Central 28 05-11-2017 08:12 PM
The First Three Diesel Passenger Cars Laurentiu The Lounge 0 07-03-2010 10:40 AM
MetroMPG.com mailbag: Metro engine won't stay warm in super cold weather MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 13 02-02-2008 12:28 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com