Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now


View Poll Results: What grade gas do you use?
Regular 51 83.61%
Midgrade 6 9.84%
Premium 4 6.56%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2008, 01:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
 
Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 328

Meat-roll - '97 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 55.4 mpg (US)

Wife's Brruik - '03 Century
90 day: 30.84 mpg (US)

Blue Balt - '08 Cobalt XFE
Team Chevy
90 day: 38.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Fuel Grades

Ok, who uses regular gas, and who uses premium? If you use premium have you noticed an FE difference in the two?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 01:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,378

The Truck (Retired) - '99 A3 Jetta TDI
90 day: 62.27 mpg (US)

The Guzzler - '08 Elantra GL
90 day: 32.95 mpg (US)

The Green Machine - '00 A4 Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
It depends. I buy regular for the Elantra and Shell V-Power (premium) diesel for the TDI.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 01:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i choose regular for my cavalier, but when i had my focus i had the ecu flashed and could only use premium.

im going to on the next two tanks however give premium a shot and see if there is any difference, but i look at it as regular is cheaper, so it would have to be a great difference in FE to make the complete switch.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 02:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
ALS
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
I use 89 in my DD an 87 Turbo Volvo. The owners manual says 91 but since I hardly ever go into boost why should I spend the money on octane I'm not using. 87 makes the car run poorly and it has pretty poor pick up if you have to put the pedal down.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 02:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glassboro, NJ
Posts: 88

Kawi - '04 Vulcan 800 Classic
90 day: 56.48 mpg (US)

The Monte - '99 Monte Carlo Z34
90 day: 28.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've used both premium and regular in my bike and have noticed no difference. The manual says use premium, but I have a small engine that just doesn't have the compression to completely burn premium.
__________________
Goal one= 30mpg on The Monte by changing the nut that connects the steering wheel to the seat.

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 03:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,198

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 SW2 Wagon
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 32 Times in 28 Posts
Will -

I ran Chevron 91 last year because of my HAI (hot-air-intake => lean-burn => higher octane is better to avoid knocking/pinging). I switched to 87 when the gas prices got too high, didn't notice a change, and never switched back.

I have a hankering to up the octane again because my car is *different* from last year. I also think it has been on 87 for so long that I might be able to detect a difference in the way it drives (big *shrug*).

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 03:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ptsmith24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 177

El Camrino - '90 Camry LE
90 day: 32.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Even if it did yield better FE, from a cost perspective it would have to make up for that 20 cents or so per gallon to truly make it economical. I wouldn't mind seeing some data on it. I'm not quite sure it's worth the gamble of higher fuel prices for few tanks, personally. I'm sure it's been looked at before somewhere.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 04:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 640

PaleCivic - '96 Civic DX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 71.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Bailout at CleanMPG, with his commute up and over a rocky mountain pass in a Yaris, tested this.
regular was best
-4% mpg with midgrade
-9% mpg with premium

I think I'll stick with the cheap stuff.
__________________
- - - - -Best 10-mile commute: 87.7 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 77.2 mpg / 935 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 05:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Ninja Tornado
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,520

Teggy - '98 Integra LS
Team Honda
90 day: 35.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
When I had my HAI (160F) I used premium to prevent detonation, but the cost-benefit was off. Now, intake temps are 100-120F with full advanced timing and no ping with near-full load (some knocking at high RPM, so I don't go there much).

The TSX "requires premium", but runs just fine on regular. The savings add up. FE is the same too. There's a bit of stumble from time-to-time at 6k RPM with VTEC, but again, very rarely used.

Long live 87!

RH77
__________________

_______1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 05:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
X-Frenchy: very
 
groar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 409

scenic - '01 scenic
90 day: 48.4 mpg (US)

megane - '97 megane classic
Diesel
90 day: 62.04 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
In my 11 years old turbo diesel I used only regular and mid-grade during years.

One of the rules to eco-drive is to shift up soon, but it had difficulties to stay at 1500rpm. During the first premium tank I felt changes and now (at 4th tank) it can accelerate from 1200-1300rpm.

Because it permits me to improve my eco-driving style premium permits me to have a better mileage. Currently I'm staying with the premium as while I'm saving 33% of diesel, I'm saving 30% of money. May be one day it will be the placebo effect... My mechanic maintains my car, but premium seams doing things my mechanic doesn't...

Denis.
__________________
Save money & CO2 at home : http://ecorenovator.org/
Created and managed by the creators of http://ecomodder.com/
---
Need your support : send me a postcard and I give 1€ to EM.com forum.
Earth=priceless so min=kilotank
kg saved 06/08-09/09: 1956.7+382.9 (ecodriving / 1420mi not driven)

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 29 08-15-2009 04:06 PM
mileage computer for a carbureted engine diesel_john Instrumentation 147 06-24-2009 10:45 AM
ElmScan + Customized Scantool Software = data logging! cfg83 Instrumentation 17 10-16-2008 09:06 PM
As I Had Thought Big Dave General Efficiency Discussion 54 09-03-2008 12:00 AM
smart cdi (diesel) owner from BC, Canada smartzuuk Introductions 21 07-06-2008 08:19 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com