Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register
Now


View Poll Results: What grade gas do you use?
Regular 51 83.61%
Midgrade 6 9.84%
Premium 4 6.56%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2008, 01:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
 
Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 321

Meat-roll - '97 Metro
90 day: 55.4 mpg (US)

Wife's Brruik - '03 Century
90 day: 30.84 mpg (US)
Fuel Grades

Ok, who uses regular gas, and who uses premium? If you use premium have you noticed an FE difference in the two?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

Check out my own little thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...oing-4967.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 01:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 731

The Truck (mine) - '99 A3 Jetta TDI
90 day: 62.27 mpg (US)

The Guzzler (hers) - '08 Elantra GL
90 day: 34.66 mpg (US)
It depends. I buy regular for the Elantra and Shell V-Power (premium) diesel for the TDI.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 01:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35

Whitey - '03 Cavalier base
90 day: 37.01 mpg (US)
i choose regular for my cavalier, but when i had my focus i had the ecu flashed and could only use premium.

im going to on the next two tanks however give premium a shot and see if there is any difference, but i look at it as regular is cheaper, so it would have to be a great difference in FE to make the complete switch.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 02:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
ALS
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 31
I use 89 in my DD an 87 Turbo Volvo. The owners manual says 91 but since I hardly ever go into boost why should I spend the money on octane I'm not using. 87 makes the car run poorly and it has pretty poor pick up if you have to put the pedal down.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 02:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glassboro, NJ
Posts: 88

Kawi - '04 Vulcan 800 Classic
90 day: 56.48 mpg (US)

The Monte - '99 Monte Carlo Z34
90 day: 28.42 mpg (US)
I've used both premium and regular in my bike and have noticed no difference. The manual says use premium, but I have a small engine that just doesn't have the compression to completely burn premium.
__________________
Goal one= 30mpg on The Monte by changing the nut that connects the steering wheel to the seat.

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 03:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,648

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Wagon SW2
90 day: 42.91 mpg (US)
Will -

I ran Chevron 91 last year because of my HAI (hot-air-intake => lean-burn => higher octane is better to avoid knocking/pinging). I switched to 87 when the gas prices got too high, didn't notice a change, and never switched back.

I have a hankering to up the octane again because my car is *different* from last year. I also think it has been on 87 for so long that I might be able to detect a difference in the way it drives (big *shrug*).

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 03:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ptsmith24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 169

El Camrino - '90 Camry LE
90 day: 34.14 mpg (US)
Even if it did yield better FE, from a cost perspective it would have to make up for that 20 cents or so per gallon to truly make it economical. I wouldn't mind seeing some data on it. I'm not quite sure it's worth the gamble of higher fuel prices for few tanks, personally. I'm sure it's been looked at before somewhere.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 04:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 275

PaleCivic - '96 Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 62.28 mpg (US)
Bailout at CleanMPG, with his commute up and over a rocky mountain pass in a Yaris, tested this.
regular was best
-4% mpg with midgrade
-9% mpg with premium

I think I'll stick with the cheap stuff.
__________________
- - - - -Best 8-mile commute: 74.8 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 66.6 mpg / 730 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 05:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Experimental
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,266

Teggy - '98 Integra LS
90 day: 35.26 mpg (US)
When I had my HAI (160F) I used premium to prevent detonation, but the cost-benefit was off. Now, intake temps are 100-120F with full advanced timing and no ping with near-full load (some knocking at high RPM, so I don't go there much).

The TSX "requires premium", but runs just fine on regular. The savings add up. FE is the same too. There's a bit of stumble from time-to-time at 6k RPM with VTEC, but again, very rarely used.

Long live 87!

RH77
__________________

_______1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 05:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
X-Frenchy: very
 
groar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 213

scenic - '01 scenic
90 day: 45.51 mpg (US)

megane - '97 megane classic
90 day: 47.36 mpg (US)
In my 11 years old turbo diesel I used only regular and mid-grade during years.

One of the rules to eco-drive is to shift up soon, but it had difficulties to stay at 1500rpm. During the first premium tank I felt changes and now (at 4th tank) it can accelerate from 1200-1300rpm.

Because it permits me to improve my eco-driving style premium permits me to have a better mileage. Currently I'm staying with the premium as while I'm saving 33% of diesel, I'm saving 30% of money. May be one day it will be the placebo effect... My mechanic maintains my car, but premium seams doing things my mechanic doesn't...

Denis.
__________________
Save money & CO2 at home : http://ecorenovator.org/
Created and managed by the creators of http://ecomodder.com/
---
Earth absorbs 1.8 t CO2/head/yr
kg saved 2008/06-11 : 324.2 (ecodriving) + 113.2 (420 m not driven)

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 05:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,648

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Wagon SW2
90 day: 42.91 mpg (US)
groar -

I only see one grade of diesel fuel in the USA (but maybe that is because I don't have a diesel car - I am not looking very hard). Can you tell me the difference in the diesel grades in France?

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 06:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
 
Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 321

Meat-roll - '97 Metro
90 day: 55.4 mpg (US)

Wife's Brruik - '03 Century
90 day: 30.84 mpg (US)
Some of these responses have been very interesting. I have been using nothing but regular after my engine rebuild so I could break it in on regular. I have been thinking about going with premium every few tanks to help clean it out.

I would have expected people to see more of a difference in FE between the two.
__________________

Check out my own little thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...oing-4967.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 06:45 PM   #13 (permalink)
Experimental
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,266

Teggy - '98 Integra LS
90 day: 35.26 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will View Post
Some of these responses have been very interesting. I have been using nothing but regular after my engine rebuild so I could break it in on regular. I have been thinking about going with premium every few tanks to help clean it out.

I would have expected people to see more of a difference in FE between the two.
I'm not sure which would be cheaper, but running a tank with the "Seafoam" additive might help clean the fuel delivery system. Every year or so I run it through the brake booster line to clean the top-end. LOTS of white smoke, but that's just the carbon build up burning-off. Others recommend Auto-RX (never tried it) -- I like Seafoam because I can find it on the shelf at the auto parts store. It's great stuff.

RH77
__________________

_______1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 08:11 PM   #14 (permalink)
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
 
Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 321

Meat-roll - '97 Metro
90 day: 55.4 mpg (US)

Wife's Brruik - '03 Century
90 day: 30.84 mpg (US)
Do you add it to your tank or pour it in the engine like others do?
__________________

Check out my own little thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...oing-4967.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 09:04 PM   #15 (permalink)
Steady as she goes
 
RacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 128

Shooting Star - '95 metro
90 day: 59.91 mpg (US)

Blue Z - '07 350Z coupe
90 day: 34.13 mpg (US)

HUFFER - '98 Riviera Super Charged
90 day: 30.69 mpg (US)

Kandy, Flake-n-Flames - '96 Riviera Base
90 day: 32.13 mpg (US)
That's ironic Will, I just topped off today with midgrade to see how it affects my metro. It'll take about a week to see, After that I have a couple of gallons of acetone (99%) laying around, I'll add a couple of ounces every tank. We'll see....

I run 87 in everything all the time except if I go racing
__________________

How about a 1 Litre Street rod?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 10:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
igo
Master EcoModder
 
igo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 298

saturn #4 - '96 Sedan SL2
90 day: 29.39 mpg (US)

Faster Bike - '04 Fastback
I used mid and prem a few years ago and couldn't tell a difference from 87 in power or mpg and figured I was just wasting money. It has been regular since.
__________________

*this is only bicycle trips that directly replace car trips.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 10:23 PM   #17 (permalink)
Experimental
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,266

Teggy - '98 Integra LS
90 day: 35.26 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will View Post
Do you add it to your tank or pour it in the engine like others do?
Both -- mostly through the booster line directly to the engine.

I perform routine maintenance and tune-ups on friend's and family's cars -- they just bring them over to "Rick's Garage". All of them get the Seafoam treatment in the tank and through the booster line.

One success story is on a low-mileage '95 Mercury Mystique 4-cylinder/auto. It's driven 5 miles/day to and from work. It was REALLY gunked up with carbon. The idle-air control valve got loaded-up and the idle speed was abnormally low -- shook the car like crazy. Either the treatment was to fix it, or replace it (difficult spot on the underside of the engine). So far, the Seafoam (and 10 miles of white smoke) did the trick.

One gunk preventer I have on the 'Teg is a PCV catch container. It's basically an air compressor moisture collector, attached inline between the PCV valve and the intake...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PCV_Catch.jpg (119.7 KB, 7 views)
__________________

_______1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 10:58 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
bhazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Swanton, OH (Toledo)
Posts: 183

The Shadow - '92 Shadow ES Turbo
90 day: 25.4 mpg (US)

Dad's Ranger - '94 Ranger Splash 2WD
90 day: 26.93 mpg (US)

The Festiva - '93 Festiva L
90 day: 47.68 mpg (US)
87 in the festiva. 92-93 in the turbo cars. I think we put reg in the shadow once and it gulped it down. I kinda wanna try a tank again just to see but im scared. Its also non intercooled with cast pistons so I do *not* want to detonate with it.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 11:19 PM   #19 (permalink)
Fear the Mullet!
 
Johnny Mullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 987

Christine - '98 Metro Base
90 day: 61.57 mpg (US)

Black Betty - '95 1500 4X4
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to Johnny Mullet Send a message via MSN to Johnny Mullet
I use premium fuel in my car because for some reason, Christine hates regular. When I run regular, the car pings going under load and feels weak. I thought I had a timing issue at first and messed with the timing like 27,000 times and found no difference unless I went way out of specs, but this caused idle issues and other problems. I decided to run premium for the hell of it and within 10 miles, I noticed better throttle response and that damn pinging (valve clatter, fuel knock) went away. I have been running it ever since and stick with one gas station when possible.

I heard all the bull from techs about 1996 and newer cars only need regular because the PCM controls the timing, blah, blah, blah. I believe that to a point, but this does not go for all cars in my opinion.

I also figure this. Premium is usually 20 cents higher than regular per gallon. My car takes 10 gallons from empty and that would equal $2.00 on a fill. I would pay that extra so the car is not subjected to any harm. As far as fuel mileage increase goes, I did not notice a change myself when I switched, but feel more confident about what's running my engine.

If your car runs fine on regular, then save the $ and use it.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2008, 11:26 PM   #20 (permalink)
Fear the Mullet!
 
Johnny Mullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 987

Christine - '98 Metro Base
90 day: 61.57 mpg (US)

Black Betty - '95 1500 4X4
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)
Send a message via AIM to Johnny Mullet Send a message via MSN to Johnny Mullet
One more note.

I do not use fuel additives, but I do use Seafoam. I buy a can and dump 1/3 in the motor oil when there is about 500 miles to go for service, another 1/3 into the fuel tank, and the last portion gets sucked right down the throttle body while the engine is running and my hand is on the throttle to keep it from stalling. After you get it all into the TB, shut off the engine and wait 5 minutes. Then go on a drive and watch the smoke! It may be very severe at first, but eventually clears out.

There is an old trick they use on the Crown Vic police interceptors where they spray water into a hot engine through the throttle body. Carbon cystalized in the combustion chamber will actually shatter when the water hits it and it breaks up and is expelled out the exhaust. I have done the water trick before, but I prefer the Seafoam since it offers lubricity and will not harm the engine in any way.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 25 11-10-2008 04:16 PM
ElmScan + Customized Scantool Software = data logging! cfg83 Instrumentation 17 10-16-2008 09:06 PM
mileage computer for a carbureted engine diesel_john Instrumentation 106 10-10-2008 02:04 PM
As I Had Thought Big Dave General Efficiency Discussion 54 09-03-2008 12:00 AM
smart cdi (diesel) owner from BC, Canada smartzuuk Introductions 21 07-06-2008 08:19 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
All content copyright EcoModder.com