09-03-2008, 01:04 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 321
|
Fuel Grades
Ok, who uses regular gas, and who uses premium? If you use premium have you noticed an FE difference in the two?
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 01:27 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 731
|
It depends. I buy regular for the Elantra and Shell V-Power (premium) diesel for the TDI.
__________________
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 01:42 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Exton PA
Posts: 35
|
i choose regular for my cavalier, but when i had my focus i had the ecu flashed and could only use premium.
im going to on the next two tanks however give premium a shot and see if there is any difference, but i look at it as regular is cheaper, so it would have to be a great difference in FE to make the complete switch.
__________________
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 02:02 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 31
|
I use 89 in my DD an 87 Turbo Volvo. The owners manual says 91 but since I hardly ever go into boost why should I spend the money on octane I'm not using. 87 makes the car run poorly and it has pretty poor pick up if you have to put the pedal down.
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 02:08 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Glassboro, NJ
Posts: 88
|
I've used both premium and regular in my bike and have noticed no difference. The manual says use premium, but I have a small engine that just doesn't have the compression to completely burn premium.
__________________
Goal one= 30mpg on The Monte by changing the nut that connects the steering wheel to the seat.
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 03:03 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,648
|
Will -
I ran Chevron 91 last year because of my HAI (hot-air-intake => lean-burn => higher octane is better to avoid knocking/pinging). I switched to 87 when the gas prices got too high, didn't notice a change, and never switched back.
I have a hankering to up the octane again because my car is *different* from last year. I also think it has been on 87 for so long that I might be able to detect a difference in the way it drives (big *shrug*).
CarloSW2
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 03:11 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 169
|
Even if it did yield better FE, from a cost perspective it would have to make up for that 20 cents or so per gallon to truly make it economical. I wouldn't mind seeing some data on it. I'm not quite sure it's worth the gamble of higher fuel prices for few tanks, personally. I'm sure it's been looked at before somewhere.
__________________
"It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived."
- General George S. Patton, Jr
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 04:09 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 275
|
Bailout at CleanMPG, with his commute up and over a rocky mountain pass in a Yaris, tested this.
regular was best
-4% mpg with midgrade
-9% mpg with premium
I think I'll stick with the cheap stuff.
__________________
- - - - -Best 8-mile commute: 74.8 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 66.6 mpg / 730 miles
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 05:07 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Experimental
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,266
|
When I had my HAI (160F) I used premium to prevent detonation, but the cost-benefit was off. Now, intake temps are 100-120F with full advanced timing and no ping with near-full load (some knocking at high RPM, so I don't go there much).
The TSX "requires premium", but runs just fine on regular. The savings add up. FE is the same too. There's a bit of stumble from time-to-time at 6k RPM with VTEC, but again, very rarely used.
Long live 87!
RH77
__________________

_______ 1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 05:36 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
X-Frenchy: very
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 213
|
In my 11 years old turbo diesel I used only regular and mid-grade during years.
One of the rules to eco-drive is to shift up soon, but it had difficulties to stay at 1500rpm. During the first premium tank I felt changes and now (at 4th tank) it can accelerate from 1200-1300rpm.
Because it permits me to improve my eco-driving style premium permits me to have a better mileage. Currently I'm staying with the premium as while I'm saving 33% of diesel, I'm saving 30% of money. May be one day it will be the placebo effect... My mechanic maintains my car, but premium seams doing things my mechanic doesn't...
Denis.
__________________
Save money & CO2 at home : http://ecorenovator.org/ 
Created and managed by the creators of http://ecomodder.com/ 
---
Earth absorbs 1.8 t CO2/head/yr
kg saved 2008/06-11 : 324.2 (ecodriving) + 113.2 (420 m not driven)
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 05:43 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,648
|
groar -
I only see one grade of diesel fuel in the USA (but maybe that is because I don't have a diesel car - I am not looking very hard). Can you tell me the difference in the diesel grades in France?
CarloSW2
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 06:29 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 321
|
Some of these responses have been very interesting. I have been using nothing but regular after my engine rebuild so I could break it in on regular. I have been thinking about going with premium every few tanks to help clean it out.
I would have expected people to see more of a difference in FE between the two.
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 06:45 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Experimental
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will
Some of these responses have been very interesting. I have been using nothing but regular after my engine rebuild so I could break it in on regular. I have been thinking about going with premium every few tanks to help clean it out.
I would have expected people to see more of a difference in FE between the two.
|
I'm not sure which would be cheaper, but running a tank with the "Seafoam" additive might help clean the fuel delivery system. Every year or so I run it through the brake booster line to clean the top-end. LOTS of white smoke, but that's just the carbon build up burning-off. Others recommend Auto-RX (never tried it) -- I like Seafoam because I can find it on the shelf at the auto parts store. It's great stuff.
RH77
__________________

_______ 1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 08:11 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
VIVA LA MPG RESISTANCE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brownsville, Tn
Posts: 321
|
Do you add it to your tank or pour it in the engine like others do?
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 09:04 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Steady as she goes
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 128
|
That's ironic Will, I just topped off today with midgrade to see how it affects my metro. It'll take about a week to see, After that I have a couple of gallons of acetone (99%) laying around, I'll add a couple of ounces every tank. We'll see....
I run 87 in everything all the time except if I go racing
__________________

How about a 1 Litre Street rod?
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 10:06 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 298
|
I used mid and prem a few years ago and couldn't tell a difference from 87 in power or mpg and figured I was just wasting money. It has been regular since.
__________________

*this is only bicycle trips that directly replace car trips.
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 10:23 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Experimental
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will
Do you add it to your tank or pour it in the engine like others do?
|
Both -- mostly through the booster line directly to the engine.
I perform routine maintenance and tune-ups on friend's and family's cars -- they just bring them over to "Rick's Garage". All of them get the Seafoam treatment in the tank and through the booster line.
One success story is on a low-mileage '95 Mercury Mystique 4-cylinder/auto. It's driven 5 miles/day to and from work. It was REALLY gunked up with carbon. The idle-air control valve got loaded-up and the idle speed was abnormally low -- shook the car like crazy. Either the treatment was to fix it, or replace it (difficult spot on the underside of the engine). So far, the Seafoam (and 10 miles of white smoke) did the trick.
One gunk preventer I have on the 'Teg is a PCV catch container. It's basically an air compressor moisture collector, attached inline between the PCV valve and the intake...
__________________

_______ 1998 Acura Integra 3-Door, Automatic _______
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 10:58 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Swanton, OH (Toledo)
Posts: 183
|
87 in the festiva. 92-93 in the turbo cars. I think we put reg in the shadow once and it gulped it down. I kinda wanna try a tank again just to see but im scared. Its also non intercooled with cast pistons so I do *not* want to detonate with it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 11:19 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Fear the Mullet!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 987
|
I use premium fuel in my car because for some reason, Christine hates regular. When I run regular, the car pings going under load and feels weak. I thought I had a timing issue at first and messed with the timing like 27,000 times and found no difference unless I went way out of specs, but this caused idle issues and other problems. I decided to run premium for the hell of it and within 10 miles, I noticed better throttle response and that damn pinging (valve clatter, fuel knock) went away. I have been running it ever since and stick with one gas station when possible.
I heard all the bull from techs about 1996 and newer cars only need regular because the PCM controls the timing, blah, blah, blah. I believe that to a point, but this does not go for all cars in my opinion.
I also figure this. Premium is usually 20 cents higher than regular per gallon. My car takes 10 gallons from empty and that would equal $2.00 on a fill. I would pay that extra so the car is not subjected to any harm. As far as fuel mileage increase goes, I did not notice a change myself when I switched, but feel more confident about what's running my engine.
If your car runs fine on regular, then save the $ and use it.
|
|
|
|
09-03-2008, 11:26 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Fear the Mullet!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 987
|
One more note.
I do not use fuel additives, but I do use Seafoam. I buy a can and dump 1/3 in the motor oil when there is about 500 miles to go for service, another 1/3 into the fuel tank, and the last portion gets sucked right down the throttle body while the engine is running and my hand is on the throttle to keep it from stalling. After you get it all into the TB, shut off the engine and wait 5 minutes. Then go on a drive and watch the smoke! It may be very severe at first, but eventually clears out.
There is an old trick they use on the Crown Vic police interceptors where they spray water into a hot engine through the throttle body. Carbon cystalized in the combustion chamber will actually shatter when the water hits it and it breaks up and is expelled out the exhaust. I have done the water trick before, but I prefer the Seafoam since it offers lubricity and will not harm the engine in any way.
|
|
|
|
|