Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-25-2012, 03:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Two of the tires I have the most experience with scored well. Conti CH95 and Mich MXV4energy. I couldn't find the Bridgestone RE092.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-25-2012, 05:34 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
I compiled the top 5 tires in each size (by my count):

__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Diesel_Dave For This Useful Post:
2speedranchero (01-18-2013), brucepick (11-25-2012), California98Civic (07-08-2013), fusion210 (11-27-2012), NachtRitter (04-01-2013), Sven7 (11-26-2012)
Old 11-26-2012, 08:59 AM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
A Load Index of 118/121 is what is generally associated with 3/4 & 1T pickups. Anything less means the pickup is not able to meet its capabilities (though there are those willing to make that trade-off; generally ride quality associated).
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 10:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by WD40 View Post
I converted it to excel if anyone can find a place to host it, I will post it
I would post is as a public file on Google Docs.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
WD40 (11-26-2012)
Old 11-26-2012, 12:34 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoMod Proof of Concept
 
WD40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chilliwack B.C. CANADA
Posts: 245

WD-40's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 56.04 mpg (US)

WD-40's Mirage - '15 Mitsubushi Mirage ES
Mitsubishi
90 day: 46.05 mpg (US)

WD-40's Sonata Hybrid - '17 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Limited
Thanks: 81
Thanked 85 Times in 45 Posts
Thanks MetroMPG ,
My OP link changed, and posted here as well
__________________
2000 Insight MT 106K Citrus A/C
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WD40 For This Useful Post:
pRoy (12-01-2012)
Old 11-26-2012, 12:59 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
I'm a little confused by things now. I was all excited by #385 (Bridgestone Dueler Alenza HL P265/70R17) which has a RRC of 6.2. Then I saw what appears to be the same tire as #149 with a RRC of 9.54. As far as I can tell the only difference is that #385 is listed as OE market (original equiptment), whereas #149 is the REP market (replacement). #385 also was reported by Bridgestone itself, whereas #149 comes from "CEC-B".

Seems like a huge difference for the same tire!
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 01:15 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
Guess what's going on the wish list

Bridgestone B381
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 02:12 PM   #18 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave View Post
I'm a little confused by things now. I was all excited by #385 (Bridgestone Dueler Alenza HL P265/70R17) which has a RRC of 6.2. Then I saw what appears to be the same tire as #149 with a RRC of 9.54. As far as I can tell the only difference is that #385 is listed as OE market (original equiptment), whereas #149 is the REP market (replacement). #385 also was reported by Bridgestone itself, whereas #149 comes from "CEC-B".

Seems like a huge difference for the same tire!
I am hoping you realize that the tires are different. #385 - the OE tire - is the tire as designed to meet some OEM's specs, where #149 - the Replacement market tire - was designed for the replacement market. They are NOT the same tire.

It is common for tires to start out as a Replacement market tire, then a program to supply a tire to an OEM comes along and the tire gets redesigned to the OEM's specs - which are a lot about RR and not much about treadwear. The Replacement tire would be completely replaced by the OE tire.

It is also common for the opposite to happen - OE tire first, then when the OEM no longer wants the tire, the tire gets changed to Replacement standards - which means a better wearing tread compound.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
Diesel_Dave (11-26-2012)
Old 11-26-2012, 03:07 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
I am hoping you realize that the tires are different. #385 - the OE tire - is the tire as designed to meet some OEM's specs, where #149 - the Replacement market tire - was designed for the replacement market. They are NOT the same tire.

It is common for tires to start out as a Replacement market tire, then a program to supply a tire to an OEM comes along and the tire gets redesigned to the OEM's specs - which are a lot about RR and not much about treadwear. The Replacement tire would be completely replaced by the OE tire.

It is also common for the opposite to happen - OE tire first, then when the OEM no longer wants the tire, the tire gets changed to Replacement standards - which means a better wearing tread compound.
So if I want OE tire (#385) is there any way for me to get it?

If I just go looking for a Bridgestone Dueler Alenza HL 265/70R17 tire, will I just automatically get the replacement version (#149)?
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 06:55 PM   #20 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave View Post
So if I want OE tire (#385) is there any way for me to get it?.........
Only if it is still in production. At this point that would be very unlikely.

__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com