Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register
Now


Reply
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2008, 10:25 PM   #1 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,031

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Video: tuft testing front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)

(See also: Video: tuft testing rear wheel skirts - Geo Metro

And -

Next step: Designing/building front wheel skirts v.1.0 (Geo Metro))

Basjoos, you're going to have company soon!

FYI, two EM members that I know of have installed front skirts: see http://ecomodder.com/forum/fuel-econ...cations.php#37

No video yet. I'll post it tomorrow probably when I've got the "skirt on" (cardboard) footage.

But a few screen grabs of the stock situation to whet your appetite:

0 km/h:



60 km/h:



The video pretty much shows what you'd expect to see (detached flow in the first 2-3 rows aft of the wheel well, and noticeable wiggling in the tufts the rest of the way back).

What will be interesting to see is how much calmer those rear-most tufts will be with the skirts on.

You should see the camera rig I set up to capture this stuff.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 10:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 1,656

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
90 day: 45.63 mpg (US)

Daox's Matrix - '03 Matrix
90 day: 38.82 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
You should see the camera rig I set up to capture this stuff.
Yes, we should. However, WE can't post pics of it. :P

Good stuff Metro!

Also, would you mind doing some even higher speed test (100 km/h / 60 mph) for us that drive faster?
__________________
EcoRenovator.org - Efficient living and green home improvement
Matrix Build Thread
Paseo Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 12:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,031

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Regarding speed: tuft testing doesn't require high speeds. It's just flow visualization. Speed matters more when trying to quantify some aero mod, where 100 km/h may reveal something you can't detect @ 60 km/h.

Also... my camera rig probably wouldn't permit very steady pics @ 100. Or stay attached to the car, for that matter!

Julian @ AutoSpeed seemed to like 70-80 km/h for his tuft testing experiments. I was aiming for 60 km/h.

-----

I captured the "skirts-on" video this AM, and again I was surprised by the results!

Just as I was surprised at what the tufts showed on the rear window/trunk of the Corolla after sticking AirTabs on the roof, sticking cardboard wheel skirts on the Firefly had a bigger apparent impact than I expected.

Here's a still captured from the "skirts-on" video (I'll post that later today):


What I saw was ALL tufts streaming back cleanly/quietly, with the exception of the one on the bottom row immediately aft of the skirt (the curve at the aft end of the skirt was too great = flow separation). Occasionally the tuft aft of that one would wiggle too, but not as much.

The biggest surprise to me were all the other tufts on the door. Not nearly as much wiggling as in the first vid. The noticeable effects of an open wheel well extend much further back than I would have guessed.

More pics & vid coming...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg metrompg-tuft-vid-skirts-60.jpg (24.8 KB, 282 views)
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 12:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 114

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
I've been thinking that the best way to hinge a tight front skirt is from the top of the fender, so that it stays roughly parallel to the airflow when it opens. I think it would be adequate to let the tires rub on the skirt to push it open, although rolling elements could be added. At low speed, when you would usually want the skirts to open, only light retaining springs would be needed. To keep them closed at speed, it might be nice to supplement the spring with a large bellows fed by ram air. Speed-controlled latches would not allow skid recovery on ice. Mechanical interlinks with the steering system might have unfortunate feedback, but servos controlled from the steering wheel could be ideal. No rubbing; you'd just have to remember the extra width in tight spots.

In general, I think that fender skirts would benefit by overlapping the body somewhat, rather than filling the existing hole.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 01:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,031

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Bicycle Bob:

I'm planning to hinge mine at the top, as you suggest and as basjoos did on his Civic: Aerocivic - how to drop your Cd from 0.34 to 0.17

Though once I start construction, I'll probably wish I'd followed the "rubber membrane" method Newton used on his Mira: DIY Rubber Front Wheel Skirts

I also like your idea of servos for hinge control (hadn't thought that there might be feedback if there were a direct link to the steering bits).

But I'm going to keep it simple and go with a low friction plastic stuck on the back side of the skirt which the tires will contact when they are steered. basjoos went with low profile metal rollers.

---

For chuckles, some pics of the camera rig, or more technically, "web cam on a metal stick, secured with duct tape, a nylon strap, rope and a bungee":



The boom is an extruded aluminum U-shaped member (the track from a large vertical blind), secured to a roof rack. Between the "skirt off" and "skirt on" video sessions, I added the rope that goes from near the end of the boom to the bottom of the passenger door, tensioned with a bungee cord to the rear of the car. That put some pre-tension on the boom and reduced the camera bounce/wiggle compared to the runs without it.





It stuck out about 4 feet from the side of the car.

I was careful not to overtake cyclists or drive close to sidewalks or utility poles!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cam-rig-1.jpg (64.8 KB, 268 views)
File Type: jpg cam-rig-2.jpg (32.5 KB, 264 views)
File Type: jpg cam-rig-3.jpg (51.0 KB, 267 views)
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 01:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 114

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
Wow, thanks for the details. I had thought that Basjoos' skirts were fixed. So much to read. . .
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 08:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
Cd
no
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 437

- - '93 Civic DX hatchback
Thank you for doing this !
I'm amazed that you did not get pulled over and ticketed for having something extending that far away from your car !

Very impressive.


( What surprises me is that your hubcaps are totally smooth, and your wheel well gap is tiny compared to most cars, yet there was such a large effect to be seen ! Imagine the effect on other cars ! )
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 10:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marana, AZ
Posts: 64
While this smooths out the side more is it possible more turbulence is created underneath due to air not escaping from the rear of the well?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 11:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 198

Gascort - '93 Escort Wagon
90 day: 40.9 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I was careful not to overtake cyclists or drive close to sidewalks or utility poles!


Funny - a roof rack being used to help FE (in the long run). Nice setup.
__________________
"You laugh now at my recycled materials-ecomodded car. I laugh later when I see you at the fuel pump!"
The day will come (soon) when a Geo is worth more than a Hummer, except for scrap metal. http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 03:46 AM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 55

GreenMile - '00 Protege ES
90 day: 32.51 mpg (US)
I havent started designing my car yet, but I gave some thought to the wheel skirt problem for the front. I was thinking of having a flexible fabric of some sort and have a guide bar that was attached around the wheel to the steering mechanism, that would push the fabric clear of the wheel during turns.

Once I get my copy of SolidWorks I will try and draw up something for you to see. (Probably about two months out still, upkeep on my car just set me back $900)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 05:17 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA
Posts: 596

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
90 day: 44.31 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 33.75 mpg (US)
Hello,

Have you heard of SpaceClaim? It is a solid modeler that costs much less than SolidWorks and it very intuitive to use -- a lot like SketchUp:

SpaceClaim | Paperless Parts
Paperless Parts
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.vox.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 12:23 AM   #12 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,031

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbro View Post
While this smooths out the side more is it possible more turbulence is created underneath due to air not escaping from the rear of the well?
I don't think it would be a problem. You suggest that some significant volume of air is entering the well from somewhere and needs an escape. I don't think that's the case.
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 12:31 AM   #13 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,031

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Video ready...

Better late than never...

__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 01:16 AM   #14 (permalink)
marcusmodder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 149

The Golden Egg - '93 Previa DX
90 day: 23.24 mpg (US)
Wow. That's pretty darn conclusive. It would be tuft to beat that mod for turbulence reduction.

Thanks for that. Very professional looking. My wheels are turning to figure out a set for my van.

Nice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 03:24 AM   #15 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,687

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Wagon SW2
90 day: 42.91 mpg (US)
MetroMPG -

Great Job! It will be neat to see your execution of the solution.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 04:13 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina SK Canada
Posts: 402

High School Bike - '98 Typhoon

Speed Bike - '79 Arcadia
Awesome video MetroMPG! Dramatic difference I say. Keep up the great work
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 07:22 AM   #17 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 1,656

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
90 day: 45.63 mpg (US)

Daox's Matrix - '03 Matrix
90 day: 38.82 mpg (US)
Very nice. I was surprised to see the improvement even above the wheel well. That is quite the difference.
__________________
EcoRenovator.org - Efficient living and green home improvement
Matrix Build Thread
Paseo Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 08:10 AM   #18 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 1,656

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
90 day: 45.63 mpg (US)

Daox's Matrix - '03 Matrix
90 day: 38.82 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Regarding speed: tuft testing doesn't require high speeds. It's just flow visualization. Speed matters more when trying to quantify some aero mod, where 100 km/h may reveal something you can't detect @ 60 km/h.
Yes, but doesn't flow seperation happen earlier/easier (you know what I mean) at higher speeds?
__________________
EcoRenovator.org - Efficient living and green home improvement
Matrix Build Thread
Paseo Build Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 09:18 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 215

vectra a - '95 Vectra GLS
90 day: 36.25 mpg (US)
perhaps it would be interesting to use the same setup to test vortex generators behind an open front wheel well.... front wheel skirts are not really an option for everyone,

but perhaps some vortex geneators just aft of the wheel could improve the situation over stock.
some people claim they should be placed in front of a wheelwell so that might be tested as well.

the full wheelwell cover will likely be superior, but it would be interesing to see where vortex generators are positioned betwee these two extremes
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 10:20 AM   #20 (permalink)
Captain Slow
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,031

Blackfly - '98 Metro
90 day: 78.69 mpg (US)

ForkenSwift - '92 Metro EV
90 day: 128.28 mpg (US)
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange4boy View Post
Wow. That's pretty darn conclusive. It would be tuft to beat that mod for turbulence reduction.

Thanks for that. Very professional looking. My wheels are turning to figure out a set for my van.
Oh the puns!
__________________
Latest test: Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete)

Latest mod project: designing/building front wheel skirts (Geo Metro)





www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads