Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2011, 09:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
pavement pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 34

Smurf - '11 Honda Civic LX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 33.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
wheel decision rotating mass vs. aero

ok so I currently have steel wheels with this cap on them:


I have an opportunity to get these alloy wheels that are the EXACT SAME SIZE OEM manufacture and weigh 4 pounds less that have this spoke pattern:


it looks like it might have more drag on it. but all else being equal, tires, backspacing etc.
do I have the potential to get better mileage with the second wheel???

thank you!

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-25-2011, 10:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Get the alloy rims, then slap on aero covers on them. Then, you'd have less unsprung rotating weight, and better aerodynamics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 10:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The fe differences will be so slight you likely won't be able to measure them.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 08:07 AM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Frank - that's true of many mods. I wouldn't discourage people from doing them though, since taken together they eventually add up to something measurable.

---

Agreed on t_vago's comment: have your cake and eat it too. Put smooth covers on the lighter wheels.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 01:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
The mass only makes a meaningful difference if you waste their momentum by braking. If you adjust your driving to eliminate using the brakes, it won't matter. This is the real world, though, and that's not always possible. I like the solution offered above - light weight and aerodynamic at the same time.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 02:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Actually, it's more accurate to state that, given some rotational acceleration, more massive wheels take more energy to change their rotational momentum than less massive wheels do.

In other words, you'll use more gas if you speed up with the heavier wheels than if you used the lighter wheels, if you sped up at the same acceleration in both cases. Also, your brakes would work harder to slow down the heavier wheels than the lighter wheels, if you braked at the same deceleration in both cases.

Conversely, if you used the same amount of throttle to accelerate, the car with heavier wheels would take longer to get to speed. If you used the same amount of braking force, the car with heaver wheels would take longer to slow down.

Classical physics in action.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 02:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
Correct - it takes more to accelerate the heavier wheels. Since we're talking about angular momentum, it takes much more.

However, if you don't use your brakes, you get all that momentum back in increased coasting distance. If you're not using the brakes, they can't be working harder.

In the real world where we sometimes do have to use brakes, it's better to build up and then waste a smaller amount of momentum, so lighter wheels are a good thing.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 03:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
Even in the real world, you can get very close to zero brake usage. On a good day, I can do my 10 mile commute with 5 brake applications. 4 stop signs and one when I park at work. On a bad day if I hit red lights that adds 5 more for a total of 10. If I'm looking ahead and anticipating correctly, I can almost guarantee I'll arrive at a green light.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
j12piprius (03-10-2011)
Old 01-26-2011, 04:29 PM   #9 (permalink)
pavement pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 34

Smurf - '11 Honda Civic LX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 33.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I notice that my worst fuel economy by far is when accelerating from a stop, I drive 40+ miles a day to work and 37 of those are on the freeway. My average mileage plummets when I start the vehicle and get the vehicle moving and slowly creeps back up as I'm cruising with very little gas and brake application. I figure lighter wheels will decrease the moment of inertia therefore allowing me to get up to speed with less energy expended. I also figure that aerodynamic drag on the whole vehicle will slow the vehicle down significantly more than and difference in rotational momentum.

keep typing, I'm liking the opinions/ ideas
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 04:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
On a good day, I can do my 10 mile commute with 5 brake applications. 4 stop signs and one when I park at work.
I've done the 1 brake application thingy on my 30 mile commute - though a large part of that is on the motorway, and it was done using the less efficient technique of engine braking (DFCO) to slow down.


On Topic :

Last september, I've gotten a set of aerodynamic wheels designed by Volvo for their more frugal DrivE models, but they're a lot heavier - a whopping 7.5 lbs apiece !
Their weight can be felt in the steering even though it's heavily assisted.
So if you're planning to remove the power steering, get the lighter wheels !

I'm now getting similar fuel consumption on lighter rims with winter tyres.
Granted, my driving habits have changed a bit, but it's also a lot colder.

It appears the extra weight cancels out the aerodynamic improvement.

I'd go light - though it's unlikely you'll regain the cost in reduced fuel consumption.

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side


Last edited by euromodder; 01-26-2011 at 06:19 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com