Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-01-2009, 03:04 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 498

2-Wheeled Mule - '06 Burgman 400
90 day: 84.89 mpg (US)

Max - '01 S-10 LS
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)

Twin Powa - '05 Ninja 250
90 day: 79.09 mpg (US)

Ransom - '01 Bravada
90 day: 16.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to The Atomic Ass
Wheels (Smaller is better)

I've been thinking on my electric car design again...

(And for those that do not worship the ground I walk on and thus have no idea what I'm talking about, (heathens), my electric car design is a ground-up build, with 4-wheel hub-motor drive, 4-wheel steering, 50KWh battery capacity, seating capacity of 6 AND a huge trunk, all wrapped in an aerodynamic shell with a planned curb weight of ~2,500 lbs. Yes, it is still a twinkle in my eye, bite me).

Anyway, I got to thinking about wheels. Looks will be a non-concern on this vehicle, as the wheels and tires will be hidden inside of the bodywork. So I got to thinking about using the smallest wheels possible, for weight reduction as well as altering the ratio on the direct-drive hub motors.

Now my design calls for high-performance, so occasionally I'll be launching off at 150KW, and reaching speeds well into the triple-digits.

How small can I go? I'm thinking there are still some viable tire options at 13", but I'm thinking of going even smaller. How about 10? 8? Is anything made other than low-speed trailer tires at these sizes?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

ASE certified day-dream engineer

I'm making beautiful music's now, hear it and like me on Facebook!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 04:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,261

Appliance White - '93 Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Sprint Base
Thanks: 43
Thanked 139 Times in 105 Posts
On an electric, you probably want to select everything for efficiency, including tires.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 04:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
93 Metro Streamliner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 180

AeroMetro - '93 Metro
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 6 Posts
No, smaller isn't better. 13 is the smallest practical size that you can get good passenger car tires for.

Smaller diameter tires will spin faster (more bearing friction) and handle bumps and potholes poorly.

I just got a set of 14 x 5.5 inch aluminum RX7 wheels for my Geo, running 175/65R14 tires.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 05:21 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 498

2-Wheeled Mule - '06 Burgman 400
90 day: 84.89 mpg (US)

Max - '01 S-10 LS
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)

Twin Powa - '05 Ninja 250
90 day: 79.09 mpg (US)

Ransom - '01 Bravada
90 day: 16.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to The Atomic Ass
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
On an electric, you probably want to select everything for efficiency, including tires.
I had assumed that as obvious.
__________________

ASE certified day-dream engineer

I'm making beautiful music's now, hear it and like me on Facebook!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 05:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 498

2-Wheeled Mule - '06 Burgman 400
90 day: 84.89 mpg (US)

Max - '01 S-10 LS
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)

Twin Powa - '05 Ninja 250
90 day: 79.09 mpg (US)

Ransom - '01 Bravada
90 day: 16.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to The Atomic Ass
Quote:
Originally Posted by hypermiler01 View Post
No, smaller isn't better. 13 is the smallest practical size that you can get good passenger car tires for.

Smaller diameter tires will spin faster (more bearing friction) and handle bumps and potholes poorly.

I just got a set of 14 x 5.5 inch aluminum RX7 wheels for my Geo, running 175/65R14 tires.
That's what I was afraid of.

I was under the impression that lighter wheels caused the suspension to handle bumps and potholes better... Does the physical size of the tire and it's attendant flexibility affect this as well?

The other consideration for size I have is reducing the size of the necessary hole in the underside of what would otherwise appear like a plane.
__________________

ASE certified day-dream engineer

I'm making beautiful music's now, hear it and like me on Facebook!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 06:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
93 Metro Streamliner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 180

AeroMetro - '93 Metro
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 6 Posts
Lighter is better, but smaller diameter tires will sink deeper in potholes and move at steeper angles. Plus spinning faster.

Also, some of the bigger tires have less rolling resistance than smaller. Michelin and Nokian both told me 14 had lower RR than their 13 size in the same tire model.

Check out Loremo.
Intro*-*Loremo - low resistance mobile

These are my new wheels. Very light, and only $50 for all 4.

I am using Nokian H silica compound tires. Not only low RR, but also very light, 2 or 3 pounds less than average weight. Nokian H won first place in German tire test this year.
Nokian H wins the German ACE tyre test
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Mazda_RX7_14x5,5.jpg (7.2 KB, 14 views)

Last edited by hypermiler01; 08-01-2009 at 01:26 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 07:32 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 680

Aerocivic - '92 Civic CX
Last 3: 70.54 mpg (US)

AerocivicLB - '92 Civic CX
Team Honda
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 104 Times in 58 Posts
All else being equal, rolling resistance is lower with a larger wheel diameter since the rubber isn't flexing as sharply where it contacts the ground. That's the reason you see large wheel diameters on racing bicycles dispite their greater aero drag.
__________________
aerocivic.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 09:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 69 Times in 56 Posts
What you want is the largest diameter tires that will fit in the body - and the smallest diameter rims (Yes, yes, but "wheels" is sometimes confusing and I want to be clear that I am talking about the metal part, not the rubber part!)

Then a check for load carrying capacity.

My guess is that you'll find out that this results in a 15" diameter rim, and a small 75 series tire - and this will probably also result in much more load carrying capacity than you need.

Just for reference, current practice seems to be to total up the maximum load each tire will be carrying (worst case), then add 15% - then that is the MINIMUM load carrying capacity needed for the tire at the pressure selected.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 08:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
...look into some motorcyce wheels.
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 12:29 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
The Atomic Ass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mason, OH
Posts: 498

2-Wheeled Mule - '06 Burgman 400
90 day: 84.89 mpg (US)

Max - '01 S-10 LS
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)

Twin Powa - '05 Ninja 250
90 day: 79.09 mpg (US)

Ransom - '01 Bravada
90 day: 16.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to The Atomic Ass
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...look into some motorcyce wheels.
Those pieces of junk do not have the life-span I am looking for. And I should know, I'm on my 3rd rear with the Mule, and soon, my second front after only 24K miles.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________

ASE certified day-dream engineer

I'm making beautiful music's now, hear it and like me on Facebook!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Civic VX wheels or aftermarket? travr6 EcoModding Central 8 03-07-2010 07:37 PM
New wheels and tires! Christ Off-Topic Tech 0 04-13-2009 11:30 PM
New Wheels & Tires trikkonceptz Success Stories 9 11-03-2008 03:05 PM
The finest Chinese cr*p that money can buy. (wheels & tires) lyd EcoModding Central 13 09-30-2008 06:41 PM
Wheels - Large or Small Diameter? Width? CorollaMaster EcoModding Central 30 05-14-2008 10:33 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com