Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2010, 10:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Absent without leave.
 
Arragonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365

George - '011 Aygo Go!
Team m8
90 day: 54.54 mpg (US)

Mildred - '011 Prius T-Spirit
90 day: 45.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
Why modern cars are rubbish (no 327 in a series...)

Thanks to the BBC.





(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
cons (09-03-2010), Nevyn (09-03-2010)
Old 09-03-2010, 10:53 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Jackson, WY
Posts: 67

Odd - '04 Ranger
90 day: 33.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Wow, I've been curious about that but never remembered to look it up. I always looked at the old version and thought, "That just seems so much smaller! And cooler!" They should just go back to the original. People would love it. Make it electric though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 01:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ohh snap
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 848

Lesbaru - '00 Outback
90 day: 21.98 mpg (US)

Convertalier - '00 Cavalier Z24 Convertible
90 day: 26.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 87 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
In 40 years it increased size by 25% but it gained ABS, air bags, traction control, fuel injection (allowing the engine to easily adapt to changing conditions), Supplementary Restraint Systems, crumple zones, it's much much faster than the original and gets equal if not better gas mileage. Plus getting a 1960's era car to 100,000 miles would be amazing, but getting a car to 100,000 miles today is an everyday occurrence.

I personally would call that a win.

The Countryman is an entirely different animal, it's like comparing a jeep wrangler to a jeep commander. They're completely different vehicles. The new mini is still being made and is nearly identical dimension wise to the '01. Furthermore the original mini was British Motors and the new ones are BMW made.

So it's more like comparing a Kaiser (or even Willys) made CJ Jeep to a Chrysler made Jeep Commander. No relation, it's just journalists backing up their short sighted opinions with some distorted facts.
__________________

Daily Driver
Winter Beast
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to brucey For This Useful Post:
Patrick (09-03-2010)
Old 09-03-2010, 01:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,652
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucey View Post
In 40 years it increased size by 25% but it gained ABS, air bags, traction control, fuel injection...
(sigh) But nobody ever asked me if I wanted any of that. And aside from fuel injection (which should actually shave a bit of weight off a car), I mostly don't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 06:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 394

Silverado - '03 Silverado W/T
Pickups
90 day: 18.7 mpg (US)

Ninja 650R - '06 Ninja 650R
90 day: 52.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucey View Post
In 40 years it increased size by 25% but it gained ABS, air bags, traction control, fuel injection (allowing the engine to easily adapt to changing conditions), Supplementary Restraint Systems, crumple zones, it's much much faster than the original and gets equal if not better gas mileage. Plus getting a 1960's era car to 100,000 miles would be amazing, but getting a car to 100,000 miles today is an everyday occurrence.

I personally would call that a win.
I've had several 60's era cars over a 100k miles. I have two sitting at home right now ('67 Mustang with 140k miles, '68 Chevy truck with 220k miles). It's not much of a feat...

There are certainly improvements, but a lot of the weight comes from overstrict safety standards, unneeded electronic gizmos, sound deadening, and the ever-increasing exterior dimensions. Most of this I would prefer to have eliminated from a new car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by brucey View Post
So it's more like comparing a Kaiser (or even Willys) made CJ Jeep to a Chrysler made Jeep Commander. No relation, it's just journalists backing up their short sighted opinions with some distorted facts.
Distorted? Not really... The Mini is just one example of many, many cars that have gotten very bloated. This is hardly a unique example.
__________________
2003 Silverado:
Aero Mods


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2010, 04:44 AM   #6 (permalink)
Absent without leave.
 
Arragonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365

George - '011 Aygo Go!
Team m8
90 day: 54.54 mpg (US)

Mildred - '011 Prius T-Spirit
90 day: 45.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
The original Mini was still selling reasonably well in 2000 when it was withdrawn. It had loads and loads of 'passes' on safety issues from the EU because it had been in continuous production in an unaltered form since 1959.

By the end the engine had fuel injection and catalysts (on an engine first made in 1952), electric coolling fans (for noise levels) and even an option of AC. It was only withdrawn so that BMW could introduce their MINI - they removed the then Rover Group's right to use the Mini name, plus of course it was the only car still using the A-series and gearbox in sump.

It rusts very quickly though - those last ones made are quite ropey now. My dad used to buy a new one each year, each on replacing the last. Every one of them already had rust by the time he traded them in.

The A-series engine is pretty remarkable too - still capable of competitive power and economy right up until the end. For example a carb fed 998cc version made 46bhp in 1982 (I had one ) and claimed up to 80 MPG (at a steady 56 mph) - in reality it made 45 in everyday use, and I drove it like any 17 year old would, on or near the red line everywhere.

A Cooper 970 or 1071 S is on my wish list even now. You get much more fun and waves in one than the modern one.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 155 05-01-2012 09:33 PM
Diesels greener than battery cars, says Swiss gov report Arragonis EcoModding Central 35 09-15-2010 12:34 AM
The First Three Diesel Passenger Cars Laurentiu The Lounge 0 07-03-2010 09:40 AM
Electric Cars Push Japan Engine Parts Makers to Crisis Mode tjts1 The Lounge 12 01-17-2010 12:23 PM
Article: Want cars to eat less? Put 'em on a diet MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 33 10-12-2008 07:54 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com