Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2009, 08:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Question Why are trains no longer streamlined ?

Yes - I know passenger trains such as the TGV, and Japanese bullet trains are all beautifully designed for good aerodynamics, but what about freight trains ?

You would think that they could at least do a half arsed attempt at it with the freight trains. Looking at freight trains, it almost looks as if they design the trains like a trailer house - complete with exposed ladders, wind catching roof overhangs, and exposed railing.

Even at the slower speeds that they travel, they would probably save several thousand gallons of fuel each year simply by a more 'retro' streamlined design.

So where did the old streamliner designs fail so badly that the newer trains had to throw the old designs to the wind ?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-05-2009, 08:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
There are still trains?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 08:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
My guess is, there's too much variation in cars and containers to even bother with it. And, they don't really get going all that fast.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 09:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Aero drag has to be darn near negligible compared to the frictional losses of umpteen thousand tons.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 10:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
Hi-Tech Redneck
 
Johnny Mullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 6
Thanked 49 Times in 42 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Johnny Mullet Send a message via MSN to Johnny Mullet
At least they would look cool
__________________

GeoMetroforum.com - got mpg?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2009, 11:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Actually they are looking aerodynamics. They have looked at placing dividers in empty coal cars and reduced drag by 21%.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 12:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
well, they claim to be able to move a ton of freight over 400 miles on a gallon of fuel... and if their design allows for better maintenance and that allows for a longer lived train and a reduction in fuel used then I say to stick with the utility design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 12:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
The more squared-off shape is probably because repairs are easier. And since the aerodynamics of the leading locomotive on a 100+ car train is probably only a tiny portion of the overall drag.

For short trains, such as Metrolink commuter trains, the nose of the locomotives are now made rounded, and there are body skirts and smooth exteriors on the cars. I just wish they'd use Green Goats on them, since they tend to accelerate/decelerate every three miles, and bleeding off the momentum in the brakes and dynamics.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 04:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,701

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
I'd like to see lightweight removable boattails on the end of the last car on long distance express trains. It should be easy to take off at the terminal station and put it on another train that's heading out. With speeds of 80-160 km/h here, and over 200 km/h in western Europe (and I don't mean TGV), maintained for hundreds of kilometers, the boattail and the extra work around it would quickly pay for itself.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 12:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Chevrolet Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 Pontiac 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
There are still trains?
Yeah really. They ripped up nearly all the tracks around here 20 years ago. The one piece of line that is left I have never seen being used.

Quote:
well, they claim to be able to move a ton of freight over 400 miles on a gallon of fuel...
I have always wondered about that commercial. Notice they only say fuel. Maybe it's uranium or plutonium.

They probably design them the way they do because it is cheaper and easier. It is always easier to build a box out of steel than any curved shape. And probably for industry standardization as well. Just like tractor trailers.

__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Super streamlined VW 'Bug' ( full boattail ) Cd EcoModding Central 22 05-09-2010 04:15 PM
Cd 0.075 (the impossible just took a little longer) aerohead Aerodynamics 8 11-26-2008 07:09 AM
High Speed Trains Finally Coming to California (and not a Moment Too Soon) SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 1 11-16-2008 09:10 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com