08-31-2013, 04:01 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Import Tuner Magazine : Project Sipper ('92 Civic VX)
I just saw that Import Tuner magazine has a project car ( A '92 Civic VX ) that they will try to get the best MPG out of that they can.
So far they are concentrating on weight reduction, and seem to be a bit shy with the aero treatment. I would have liked to see them work more on the aero of the car, since these guys are professionals and could make the car look sharp.
I think a lot of guys would change their view of an aero-modded car if a major " accepted " magazine showed how that it is possible to aero-mod a car and have it still look "cool"
Actually, they have done a few mods that are very familiar here - they installed a kamm-back spoiler and blocked off the fog light holes, and are planning a belly-pan as well next issue.
To my surprise, they have the current issue online.
Here is the link
Part one : 1992 Honda Civic VX - Import Tuner Magazine
Part two
1992 Honda Civic VX - Import Tuner Magazine
I can't wait to see what these guys come up with ( and what kind of results they get )
Last edited by Cd; 09-05-2013 at 06:38 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
ausias (01-02-2014), California98Civic (09-05-2013), cbrer (01-16-2014), drees (11-07-2013), fifteenwindow (09-06-2013), Gasoline Fumes (09-02-2013), Joggernot (12-06-2013), MetroMPG (09-03-2013), mikeyjd (09-05-2013), pgfpro (11-10-2013), Whatthecuss (09-05-2013), Xist (02-09-2020) |
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 04:07 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
" The plan is to build a visually appealing car with absolutely no compromise to its looks. No spaceship body kit, ugly wheel covers, or teardrop-shaped nose cones. "
Teardrop-shaped nose cones ? Nose cone ? The cone goes at the back of the car :-)
Installing the cone at the front of the car does virtually nothing for the aerodynamics of the car unless it acts as a grille block or the car reaches over 250 mph . ( or was that 350 ? )
Last edited by Cd; 08-31-2013 at 04:12 PM..
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 04:15 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Check out their cool kammback :
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 04:34 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 540
Thanks: 30
Thanked 190 Times in 110 Posts
|
Did they create any type of baseline number in the first issue? I think we here at EcoModder are going to be disappointed in the results, but they will probably be happy. If they don't get over 75 MPG than the whole thing was a joke. We've got basically stock cars that get over 60 MPG, without the thousands and thousands of dollars worth of carbon fiber they put on the car.
I think they had the right idea with weight savings, but they went too far. It's already a light car compared to everything else on the road. I would have rather seen more investment into tuning the lean burn, and "hidden" aero mods.
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 05:00 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 332
Thanks: 16
Thanked 79 Times in 54 Posts
|
An mpg-themed exercise in product placement. Next month: same thing, different excuse.
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 05:29 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,749
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
Seems like the article is a long advertisement for various aftermarket part suppliers and installers.
Since they spent so much money to reduce a couple pounds, I'm surprised they didn't go with lightweight wheels.
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 06:03 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
It's not a surprise though that they are using so many aftermarket parts. They are a magazine that sells stuff to stay afloat.
For instance that carbon fiber kamm-back could have been made from scrap Coroplast and cost hundreds ( thousands ? ) less, been lighter, and been just as effective.
But that's not going to sell any products.
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 06:19 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 540
Thanks: 30
Thanked 190 Times in 110 Posts
|
Whats really interesting is that they spent a lot of money on the custom carbon fiber, but then got the cheapest camber kit available. I mean Blox is pretty much an eBay brand. It's bottom of the barrel in the Honda tuning community, a slight step up from the no-brand eBay crap. It will work just fine, I even bought that same set to use on my Del Sol years ago, but for an "all out" build they chose some interesting brands.
I think this is evidence to prove the theories above, about this being just product sales. If there is any good to come out of this, it's that there is another VX still on the road, and more exposure to ecoModding in the main stream car crowd.
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 06:35 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
...about this being just product sales.
|
Aren't they all?
|
|
|
08-31-2013, 06:42 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd
For instance that carbon fiber kamm-back could have been made from scrap Coroplast and cost hundreds ( thousands ? ) less, been lighter, and been just as effective.
But that's not going to sell any products.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbaber
Whats really interesting is that they spent a lot of money on the custom carbon fiber, but then got the cheapest camber kit available.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd
" The plan is to build a visually appealing car with absolutely no compromise to its looks. No spaceship body kit, ugly wheel covers, or teardrop-shaped nose cones. "
Teardrop-shaped nose cones ? Nose cone ? The cone goes at the back of the car :-)
Installing the cone at the front of the car does virtually nothing for the aerodynamics of the car unless it acts as a grille block or the car reaches over 250 mph . ( or was that 350 ? )
|
What do you expect from a magazine that is trying to appeal to kids who draw cars with rockets and machine guns on them during math class?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|