View Single Post
Old 03-27-2011, 01:58 PM   #55 (permalink)
orange4boy
Master EcoModder
 
orange4boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275

The Golden Egg - '93 Toyota Previa DX
90 day: 31.91 mpg (US)

Chewie - '03 Toyota Prius
90 day: 57 mpg (US)

The Spaceship - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
LRR tires meet the same federal standards for treadwear, traction, and temperature resistance as regular tires.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pendragon View Post
all low rolling resistance tires have made compromises which have made the tire's performance in braking and wet weather traction less than many of the tires which are not marketed as low rolling resistance.
That's the statement I'm addressing. That's an over generalization which gives the impression that all LRR tires are crap. If you had put 'some' in there I'd be cool with it.

I absolutely agree with you that tire purchases require some thought and study to wade through the hype. Sadly very few people bother.

As for the "Energy Saver":

From Autoblog Green:
Quote:
According to Consumer Reports, both the Michelin Energy Saver A/S and Cooper GFE served as good all-purpose tires, but the Michelin Man came out swinging with superior performance in rolling resistance along with wet and dry braking. In fact, so good was the performance of the Energy Savers that they would slot in at number two on CR's chart of all comparable tires regardless of their rolling resistance rating.
Sorry about the thread jacking... Back to the tail...
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.

"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.


  Reply With Quote