View Single Post
Old 09-21-2011, 06:06 PM   #15 (permalink)
Clev
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by roosterk0031 View Post
Actually the EPA E85 ratings are roughly 1/3 lower than E0 ratings. 1/3 or 22 is 7, so 22-7 is 15, 1/3 off 33 is 11 so 33-11 is 22(1 off). I don't think they test E85, they use the 32.8% or so energy difference and round it off.
Meaning of course that they have no incentive to tune the engine for efficiency on E85. After all, if they maximize E0 efficiency, it improves the artificially contrived E85 number, even if the car actually runs like crap on E85.
__________________

  Reply With Quote