View Single Post
Old 12-27-2011, 12:46 PM   #49 (permalink)
COcyclist
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
The alternative is a sloping bumper and front end, which doesn't look as good. Bulldog noses are in fashion.
Many European countries have strict laws about pedestrian safety which may have much to do with the current trend to upright front ends. However, car companies are now radically curving the sides of the bumper toward the front wheels at the same time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentraguy View Post
Okay so back to the big debate. Using a full underskirt, which is a better bumper: using the stock bumper with fillers, using a flat front with sharp breaks, or using a rounded over/wedge bumper? I have seen impressive results on all of them on this site. I am currently getting almost 40 mpg, so I would love to see at least 55 consistently.


IMHO if you can get your car to look closest to the Impact concept, the better. So, smooth, gently rounded is best. Post a photo of the finished one?
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote