View Single Post
Old 03-30-2014, 10:59 AM   #37 (permalink)
Vekke
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,246

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 804 Times in 392 Posts
Rolling resistance can be bigger % change but the effect to fuel consumption is max 7-8% at least what I have seen in local magazines (been following the tests over 4 years perioid summer and winter tires) and they have usually one or two reference tires of chinese marks (non brand) just to see the level of their performance.

This years test had 16 tires and biggest difference was 6% to fuel consumption. and the suprice performer was Landsail LS288 which outrun few of the brand tires in some tests. That tire set reference price was 350€ 8.6 points of 10 vs winner Continental Contipremium Contact 5 550€ per set 9.5 of 10. tested size was 205/55R16
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote