View Single Post
Old 06-17-2015, 06:58 PM   #35 (permalink)
jedi_sol
Master EcoModder
 
jedi_sol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 929

2013 STi *SOLD* - '13 Subaru Impreza WRX STi
Subaru
Sports Cars
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 26.59 mpg (US)

1996 Geo Metro *RETIRED from Ecomodding* - '96 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 58.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 368
Thanked 380 Times in 238 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;483812
Owners with turbocharged engines, on the other hand, were the biggest losers. Owners of turbocharged V6 engines reported fuel economy 9-percent lower than estimates, and owners of turbocharged four-cylinder engines reported fuel economy that was 4-percent lower than expected.
I don't seem to suffer from this problem

City driving - stay out of boost, duh.

Highway driving - at 65mph is right at the cusp of boost. Therefore, drive 60mph to stay out of boost. Then for P&G I use shorts amounts of boost to get to speed a lot quicker = longer glides = increased average mpg.

3 Seconds of short boost acceleration only lowers my trip mpg by 0.1mpg vs 6 seconds of nonboosting acceleration can lower my trip mpg by 0.5mpg
__________________







See the rest of the Sti project log:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...log-26612.html
  Reply With Quote