View Single Post
Old 11-20-2015, 02:55 PM   #22 (permalink)
darcane
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BabyDiesel View Post
The math worked like this for me - A 1.5" primary SBC Header will have a primary cross section of 1.767". 25% of this would be 1.325". Since there is a greater focus on low-end, I believe Tim could go slightly smaller. A 1.25" primary gives ((0.625" x 0.625")3.14), which equates to a 1.227" cross section, a 30.6% decrease.

So 1.25" seems to be the front runner unless there is some specific exhaust information that we are missing...

Edit: Tim posted right before me. Throw all this malarky out the window!
CFM is the key metric. The SBC with 1.5" primaries is likely trying to improve torque at relatively high RPMs. The large displacement and high revs will mean a very high rate of flow.

Designing a header for a small displacement Geo engine running at low RPMs, and part throttle will need a very different design since the CFM is so low. If this header ever gets built, be aware it will significantly restrict high RPM performance.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote