11-20-2015, 02:18 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Lean Burn Cruiser!
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
|
Lol you're welcome Tim! I enjoy bouncing ideas around and trying to help excellent work on deducing the info down to what you need!
That does seem ridiculously small, even for a 1.0!
If you do not mind ordering pipe, I found this site - Order Stainless 316 Tube in Small Quantities at OnlineMetals.com Where you can get 8' of 5/8" OD, 0.495" ID 316/316L tubing for around $80 after shipping and a 10% discount. That would be more appropriately sized for what you need, but it would not be mandrel bent. You would have to find an exhaust shop to do it for you, and I doubt you want to do that.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-20-2015, 02:55 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
.........................
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BabyDiesel
The math worked like this for me - A 1.5" primary SBC Header will have a primary cross section of 1.767". 25% of this would be 1.325". Since there is a greater focus on low-end, I believe Tim could go slightly smaller. A 1.25" primary gives ((0.625" x 0.625")3.14), which equates to a 1.227" cross section, a 30.6% decrease.
So 1.25" seems to be the front runner unless there is some specific exhaust information that we are missing...
Edit: Tim posted right before me. Throw all this malarky out the window!
|
CFM is the key metric. The SBC with 1.5" primaries is likely trying to improve torque at relatively high RPMs. The large displacement and high revs will mean a very high rate of flow.
Designing a header for a small displacement Geo engine running at low RPMs, and part throttle will need a very different design since the CFM is so low. If this header ever gets built, be aware it will significantly restrict high RPM performance.
|
|
|
11-20-2015, 09:06 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,714
Thanks: 8,150
Thanked 8,928 Times in 7,371 Posts
|
Tubing lengths and diameters will be whatever they turn out to be. The three things I'm wondering about are: - the transition from the square port to the smaller tube
- the collector, when the pulses are 120° apart
- the exhaust tip coupling to the ambient atmosphere
|
|
|
11-20-2015, 09:43 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Too many cars
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,610
Thanks: 1,360
Thanked 810 Times in 481 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BabyDiesel
My apologies if I was not clear. CID is Cubic Inch Displacement. The 350 SBC will have 43.75 cubic inches of displacment per cylinder, therefore per primary. The Metro 1.0 has around 33 cubic inches of displacement per cylinder, roughly 25% less.
|
993 CC = 60.6 CID. Or about 20 CID per cylinder.
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Gasoline Fumes For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-20-2015, 11:03 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
Using "first-cut" design equations, the equal-length exhaust pipe dimensions are roughly:
• LENGTH (exhaust valve to collector):
2000 RPM ≈ 108" (longer than the 89.2" wheelbase!)
5100 RPM ≈ 42.4"
• DIAMETER (inside pipe):
2000 RPM ≈ 0.77"
5100 RPM ≈ 1.23"
...which looks like 1.0" dia and very L-O-N-G header pipes between the engine and collector.
|
How did you calculate this?
|
|
|
11-20-2015, 11:25 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Ahhh, you deleted your posts, thats why I couldn't see it.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 09:34 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,594 Posts
|
Daox, have you condsidered a water jacket? You'll need to open up your grille block a little, but it will significantly improve warmup times.
|
|
|
11-21-2015, 02:22 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky
Daox, have you condsidered a water jacket? You'll need to open up your grille block a little, but it will significantly improve warmup times.
|
That is a great idea, and if I actually go about fabricating the design it will definitely be considered.
|
|
|
|