View Single Post
Old 12-30-2019, 03:36 PM   #328 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,990
Thanks: 8,226
Thanked 8,999 Times in 7,433 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by errorhead ;)
We need to remove existing GHG,but so far,the operating efficiencies are quite low,costs high.
At Permalink #315 I suggested hempcrete to impound atmospheric CO2 through new construction. Another example would be carbon-negative concrete. You'd need that for foundations and underwater.

I'm sure there are plenty of people who would charge big bucks for ineffectual remediation.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

________________
.
.
Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-30-2019)