Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Did you pick up any new tips from the list?
Yes 267 92.39%
No 22 7.61%
Voters: 289. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-20-2009, 12:39 PM   #181 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lone star state
Posts: 55
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
keep in mind, that most obd2 tools do NOT know which mode the ECU is running in.
for any reporting of MPG or fuel used absolute.

Cold start.
warmup
hot run
accel. (fast gas foot) switches modes. !)
wot
unflood.
deceleration (in gear or out of gear)

it just dumbly assumes, stocheometric AFR. this is far from accurate.

IMHO

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-20-2009, 01:10 PM   #182 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
McTimson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nyack, NY
Posts: 310

Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XLT
90 day: 40.6 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
The MPGuino is tapped right into the fuel injectors, and shows 0.00 gallons/hour of fuel being used under DFCO. OBD2 tools use sensors, but the MPGuino reports right from the source, and the source says no fuel is being used.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 04:50 PM   #183 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lone star state
Posts: 55
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
have both , and DSO and 3 diff full logging, OBD2 Scan tools. ( 96 era to present)

the MPGuino, is the cheapest path to the answers.

the Sensor way , is not any good for the reasons stated.
it is a calculated value and not a sensed value.
A derived result that only comes close when cruising. (and then only after a careful calibration of the tool)

the MAF in no way senses gas flow.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 05:02 PM   #184 (permalink)
Diesel Driver
 
milesgallon.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 21

Green Opel - '98 Opel Astra
90 day: 41.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Maybe I'm making a fool of myself for asking, but can you explain what an MPGuino is? I've never heard of it.
__________________
Simon

I've done a gas mileage calculator for people that doesn't like to do math. There's also a miles to km converter and some other tools.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 05:11 PM   #185 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
It's a simple little tool based that works like a ScanGauge for those among us who can't use a ScanGauge. It's also cheaper, in that it comes as a preassembly, or a DIY kit.

The only foolish question is the one that goes unasked. The only way you can truly be foolish is to think yourself a fool for the desire to learn.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 11:42 AM   #186 (permalink)
Diesel Driver
 
milesgallon.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 21

Green Opel - '98 Opel Astra
90 day: 41.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is there a place you can buy the MPGuino online? And of course I'm wondering, if it's a do it yourself kit... is it difficult to install? Anyone here that have done it?
__________________
Simon

I've done a gas mileage calculator for people that doesn't like to do math. There's also a miles to km converter and some other tools.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2009, 07:19 PM   #187 (permalink)
W. Kiernan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lutz FL
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a question regarding tip #44:

When you *have* to slow down, here's an approximate hierarchy of methods, from best to worst.

1) coasting in neutral, engine off (ie. roll to a stop);
2) coasting in neutral, engine idling;
3) regenerative coasting (hybrid vehicles)
4) regenerative braking (hybrid vehicles)
5) coasting in "deceleration fuel cut-off" mode (in gear, above a certain engine RPM)
6) conventional friction braking (non-hybrid or hybrid)

My car ('99 Miata) has a manual transmission. I have read that when it's coasting in gear the ECU cuts the fuel feed to zero. In contrast, when the engine is idling while coasting in neutral, the ECU not only feeds gas to the engine to keep it turning, but it feeds more gas than when it is idling in neutral at a standstill. You can see this by watching the tach; in neutral, it idles at 1100-1200 RPM as long as the car is moving at all, then the instant the car comes to a complete halt the idle speed drops to 800 RPM.

So if I engine-brake up to red lights or stop signs, momentum I'm trying to burn up anyway keeps the engine turning, which powers the alternator, power steering, oil and water pumps and even the a/c for free (that is, with zero gas consumption), whereas if I put it in neutral and use the brakes to slow down I have to burn gas to run all those appliances.

Am I missing something here? When I finally break down and get a Scan Gauge I'll be able to tell what's going on better.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wkiernan For This Useful Post:
greenman (08-10-2010)
Old 12-29-2009, 08:00 PM   #188 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,519

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,076
Thanked 6,963 Times in 3,606 Posts
Hi, wkiernan -

To be clear, #2 should say "rolling to a stop" as well. The distinction being that rolling takes you significantly further than engine braking in fuel-cut mode. Which necessarily means you used less fuel up to the point of beginning the coast (assuming you're able to roll right up to the stop).

You're right that if you need to bleed speed faster than a pure neutral coast, decel fuel cut off mode (DFCO) is a good tactic in a non-hybrid.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
greenman (08-10-2010)
Old 01-14-2010, 02:13 PM   #189 (permalink)
Calibration Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 86

Subie - '00 Subaru Impreza STi JDM
90 day: 22.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
wkiernan, I read the list and was going to post the exact point you just made and Metro answered. Although some of the ideas in the list are good, most of the techniques listed are actually just good ways to trick OBD2 scan gauges into showing you a better MPG than you're actually getting.

The other point of the list is that while it may it may give you better fuel economy it is more likely to encourage other roadusers to expend more fuel. If faking a turn for example might get others to pass you or it might just get them to brake anticipating your slowing down. It might also piss them off, getting them to accelerate to get around you. So you saved 0.1l of fuel hypermiling home but caused other roadusers to expend 2l of fuel avoiding you.

The whole pulse and coast thing is also very specific and if you shut your engine off for the coast will make your general mechanic very happy. Starter motors are engineered to last for X number of starts. It also puts a significant drain on your battery and you then have to expend extra fuel charging it up again. You can bump start the car too but that puts significant wear on your clutch as they are not designed to be shocked in the opposite direction (breaks the steel straps in the pressure plate). So you might save $100 in fuel but spend $1500 on a new clutch.

Also, an accelerating engine produces more emissions and burns a lot more fuel. During cruise many vehicles use EGR and lean running modes to improve efficiency. They don't operate immediately after a start.

Finally, I have one last thing that can be added to the list.

Use the lowest octane fuel approved for your vehicle. Not only is lower octane fuel cheaper but it has more BTU's of energy per litre. Some vehicles do get better economy on the higher octane fuel but most do not. Depends on the tuning of the vehicle from the factory.

-Michael
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to hackish For This Useful Post:
greenman (08-10-2010)
Old 03-02-2010, 04:27 PM   #190 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,519

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,076
Thanked 6,963 Times in 3,606 Posts
Michael, you raise some valid points.

As for the ecodriver/hypermiler's impact on other road users, please note the introductory text on the tips page encourages people to take other traffic users into consideration.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hackish View Post
most of the techniques listed are actually just good ways to trick OBD2 scan gauges into showing you a better MPG than you're actually getting.
Could you give examples?

Regarding pulse & glide:

Quote:
Starter motors are engineered to last for X number of starts.
Agreed, and we know of at least one heavy pulse & glide user (with automatic transmission) who has had to replace a starter, presumably for this reason.

Quote:
It also puts a significant drain on your battery and you then have to expend extra fuel charging it up again.
The depth of discharge of course depends on electrical load and time.

Quote:
You can bump start the car too but that puts significant wear on your clutch
I suggest clutch wear is more a function of the driver than the technique itself. (In other words, it can be accomplished with varying degrees of harshness to the components.) We have anecdotal evidence of this technique being used for hundreds of thousands of miles with no clutch issues.

Quote:
Use the lowest octane fuel approved for your vehicle. Not only is lower octane fuel cheaper but it has more BTU's of energy per litre. Some vehicles do get better economy on the higher octane fuel but most do not. Depends on the tuning of the vehicle from the factory.
Interesting - didn't know the energy content was different by fuel grade.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com