Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-02-2024, 11:13 AM   #1 (permalink)
Y2kbug
 
y2kbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 43

1999 corolla - '99 Toyota Corolla CE
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.1 mpg (US)

03 dakota v6 2wd auto - '03 Dodge Dakota
Team Dodge
90 day: 18.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Dakota is lowered and street legal

the government approved my rebuild title for my dodge and I got the plate for it yesterday. Today is the first day ive driven it to work in 9 months.
The truck was my daily driver until i got rear ended. The rear bumper was destroyed, frame was bent, bed dented and the bed hit the cab and dented that too.
Before i generally seen 18-22 mpg during warm months. Best mpg i got was 23 mpg. V6 2wd auto 2003 263,xxx miles

Do you think i will see any improvements in fuel mileage now that it is lowered about 4 to 5 inches?

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to y2kbug For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-05-2024)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-02-2024, 08:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,572 Times in 1,594 Posts
I would be shocked if you didn't.

Broadly speaking, the only way you wouldn't see an improvement is if the gearing is far too short.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2024, 11:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
' think '

Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kbug View Post
the government approved my rebuild title for my dodge and I got the plate for it yesterday. Today is the first day ive driven it to work in 9 months.
The truck was my daily driver until i got rear ended. The rear bumper was destroyed, frame was bent, bed dented and the bed hit the cab and dented that too.
Before i generally seen 18-22 mpg during warm months. Best mpg i got was 23 mpg. V6 2wd auto 2003 263,xxx miles

Do you think i will see any improvements in fuel mileage now that it is lowered about 4 to 5 inches?
We have laboratory evidence for at least one vehicle that demonstrated 'zero' drag reduction from 'lowering', the 1999- Audi A2.
There's a dearth of data afforded to us on the effects of lowering, making any generalities 'risky.'
Whatever the width of your tires, exposed to the airstream, you've reduced that value by that total width, in inches, times 4-5-inches in height, divided by 144-sq-inches/square-foot, subtracted from the OEM frontal projected area; 'typically' something which would 'reduce' overall drag.
The caveat is that, the Dakota could also be an 'outlier' like the Audi.
Any mpg 'improvement', compared toy our 'baseline', if experienced, would be attributed to lowering.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2024, 07:10 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: greece
Posts: 33
Thanks: 17
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by y2kbug View Post
the government approved my rebuild title for my dodge and I got the plate for it yesterday. Today is the first day ive driven it to work in 9 months.
The truck was my daily driver until i got rear ended. The rear bumper was destroyed, frame was bent, bed dented and the bed hit the cab and dented that too.
Before i generally seen 18-22 mpg during warm months. Best mpg i got was 23 mpg. V6 2wd auto 2003 263,xxx miles

Do you think i will see any improvements in fuel mileage now that it is lowered about 4 to 5 inches?
WELL frontal area is reduced drag is probably the same number or little higher or lower .
Now dont expect big diffrence in mpg it will be really not that noticable
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2024, 04:44 PM   #5 (permalink)
Y2kbug
 
y2kbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 43

1999 corolla - '99 Toyota Corolla CE
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.1 mpg (US)

03 dakota v6 2wd auto - '03 Dodge Dakota
Team Dodge
90 day: 18.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
I have driven it for a few weeks now with it lowered and i have noticed a 2-3 mpg fuel gain. Unfortunately there are too many things that could effect my fuel mileage so it may not be accurate. I am looking forward to driving next summer and then i can get better results. I am parking it for the winter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2024, 05:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,731
Thanks: 8,156
Thanked 8,938 Times in 7,380 Posts
Part of hypermiling is not slowing down for corners. Has lowering affected your following 'the line' through corners?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2024, 06:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
Y2kbug
 
y2kbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 43

1999 corolla - '99 Toyota Corolla CE
Team Toyota
90 day: 47.1 mpg (US)

03 dakota v6 2wd auto - '03 Dodge Dakota
Team Dodge
90 day: 18.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
I can now go around turns faster. Unfortunately i have lost suspension travel and rear end slides out around corners because of higher speeds. I am wanting wider rear tires now. My rear tires get poor traction in wet conditions and i have found it dangerous to the point of almost getting rear ended again. My plan is to notch the rear frame. I am not sure what i will do with the front suspension. I haven't found drop spindles for this truck.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to y2kbug For This Useful Post:
freebeard (12-23-2024)
Old Yesterday, 08:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 489
Thanks: 81
Thanked 223 Times in 185 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Part of hypermiling is not slowing down for corners. Has lowering affected your following 'the line' through corners?
Plus accounting for increased tire wear by higher corner speeds and resulting in further lowering of chassis, one also might see further frontal area reduction and resulting mpg improvement.

Just kidding
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,731
Thanks: 8,156
Thanked 8,938 Times in 7,380 Posts
Following the line through corners minimizes lateral force and tire wear (the opposite to drifting) (40% of microplastic pollution). Banned member slowmover was fond of saying no sashaying on the straights.

I'm not kidding -- or am I?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 489
Thanks: 81
Thanked 223 Times in 185 Posts
But at a higher corner speed which the reduced frontal area likely will supply, it will INCREASE tire wear reducing tire diameter lowering the vehicle further was my supposition.

Whatever, Merry Christmas.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to j-c-c For This Useful Post:
freebeard (Today)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com