Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-22-2013, 06:54 AM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,004

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 56.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,715
Thanked 2,252 Times in 1,458 Posts
We'll see. Even if the warmth has no effect on the combustion, at least it would reduce pumping losses by making the air less dense. Though that will only make for a few % improvement.

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-22-2013, 09:54 AM   #52 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Dorset UK
Posts: 106
Thanks: 1
Thanked 56 Times in 29 Posts
Landcruiser 24v 4.2TD's have these as standard, its a heater element in the intake manifold


__________________
Black Lupo 3L 1.2tdi Manual converted the windsurfing bus!

Kermit the Lupo 3L 1.2 Tdi with a current mpg record of 114mpg (imperial) Now sold

G1 JDM Insight I hate the ride but love the quirkiness
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cptsideways For This Useful Post:
jeff88 (12-22-2013), Occasionally6 (01-10-2015), RedDevil (12-22-2013)
Old 12-22-2013, 12:42 PM   #53 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
xyz, 85 thousand miles and counting. Ive already exceeded 100 mpg and ironically you get the better fuel economy from being agressive with this car.

serialk11r, thats my guess too, not to mention its likely in the otto cycle vs atkinson cycle too.

Red, be interesting to see the results. Of course here when its cold out its right around freezing 32 f / 0 c. I tried removing the snorkle and flipping it around to suck from the rad, but after 10 miles mpg tanks. It seems for trips 10 miles or more you need cold air for better mpg.

Maybe instead of feeding it warm air you can just rig up resistors and switches to feed fake signals to the cpu to make it think its warmer? Some of the gen 1 owners move the ambient temp sensor closer to the rad vs on edge of the bumper or just replace it with a resistor to enable auto stop and such at cold temps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 02:05 PM   #54 (permalink)
XYZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 533
Thanks: 31
Thanked 86 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobb View Post
xyz, 85 thousand miles and counting. Ive already exceeded 100 mpg and ironically you get the better fuel economy from being agressive with this car.
You say you have exceeded 100 MPG and that your driving style is that of "hauling ass" and flooring it.

Is this credible? Or are we driving on the unicorn speedway?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 02:52 PM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,004

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 56.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,715
Thanked 2,252 Times in 1,458 Posts
Cobb used his 4 kW PHEV kit to get to 100 mpg.
I want a PHEV kit too, making it essential to retain heat; a eWAI could help heat the engine and with the electric backing its power use is not an issue.

Cobb is right about aggressive acceleration.
Accelerating moderately will have the Insight use EV boost even while not at WOT. Once at speed it goes into regen to make up for the power spent; some energy gets lost in the conversion.
Accelerating hard will have full boost for a very short time, so less regen.
Accelerating very gently uses no boost, this is what I aim for when possible.

Got a couple of free days after Christmas to try some out; spending the week at my inlaws, hopefully they keep the kids busy a bit. Had hoped to do some today but never got the chance, babysitting my Asperger son and daughter while my wife was in the choir singing. I can dream but my hands are tied.
With lots of time to think but little to act I must do the latter to max efficiency.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
Cobb (12-22-2013), mikeyjd (01-06-2015)
Old 12-22-2013, 05:35 PM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
Anyhoo, re-reading the first post I assumed the poor winter mpg was related to the following.

1, winter fuel that is full of non value added fluids other than gasoline.

2, cold air is more dense and takes more energy to plow through.

3, sleet, snow, slush all take more effort to drive through, makes the vehicle heavier and cause it to drive at a slower than efficient speed.

4, more fuel is needed to maintain operating temp, not to mention achieve it.

5, additional fuel is needed to heat the nut behind the steering wheel.

I was on a long drive once and fooled with the heater. When turning the heater on to blow more heat I could watch my mpg average start to drop, turning it down I saw it come back.

My question was rather using an electric heater vs the water powered one that came with the vehicle would make more economical sense?

12V Direct Hook Up Ceramic Heater Fan Swivel Base RV camper Automotive Portable | eBay
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 07:35 PM   #57 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by XYZ View Post
You say you have exceeded 100 MPG and that your driving style is that of "hauling ass" and flooring it.

Is this credible? Or are we driving on the unicorn speedway?
Problem with gasoline engine is the isobaric expansion on the intake cycle.
Its is unavoidable, on a small 4cyl car going 60mph isobaric losses can equal 2hp, that doesn't sound like much but when you consider it only takes 10 to 12 horses to push the car down the road 2hp is substantial.

You can reduce isobaric losses through harder acceleration.

Lucky for me diesels don't have this constant battle between opposing forces.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 07:38 PM   #58 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,312

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,584 Times in 2,845 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobb View Post
Anyhoo, re-reading the first post I assumed the poor winter mpg was related to the following.

1, winter fuel that is full of non value added fluids other than gasoline.

2, cold air is more dense and takes more energy to plow through.

3, sleet, snow, slush all take more effort to drive through, makes the vehicle heavier and cause it to drive at a slower than efficient speed.

4, more fuel is needed to maintain operating temp, not to mention achieve it.

5, additional fuel is needed to heat the nut behind the steering wheel.

I was on a long drive once and fooled with the heater. When turning the heater on to blow more heat I could watch my mpg average start to drop, turning it down I saw it come back.

My question was rather using an electric heater vs the water powered one that came with the vehicle would make more economical sense?

12V Direct Hook Up Ceramic Heater Fan Swivel Base RV camper Automotive Portable | eBay
Only way I can see electric heat being more efficient is if you have a seat heater, for get about heating the air and it being more efficient.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 08:59 PM   #59 (permalink)
XYZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 533
Thanks: 31
Thanked 86 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cobb View Post
Anyhoo, re-reading the first post I assumed the poor winter mpg was related to the following.

1, winter fuel that is full of non value added fluids other than gasoline.

2, cold air is more dense and takes more energy to plow through.

3, sleet, snow, slush all take more effort to drive through, makes the vehicle heavier and cause it to drive at a slower than efficient speed.

4, more fuel is needed to maintain operating temp, not to mention achieve it.

5, additional fuel is needed to heat the nut behind the steering wheel.

I was on a long drive once and fooled with the heater. When turning the heater on to blow more heat I could watch my mpg average start to drop, turning it down I saw it come back.

My question was rather using an electric heater vs the water powered one that came with the vehicle would make more economical sense?

12V Direct Hook Up Ceramic Heater Fan Swivel Base RV camper Automotive Portable | eBay

Apparently you are in Miami, FL. Not much need for generating heat there. Lucky you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 10:16 PM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
BULL CRAP!!!!!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by XYZ View Post
Apparently you are in Miami, FL. Not much need for generating heat there. Lucky you.
Yeah, seems the ima system is like 60% efficient. http://api.viglink.com/api/click?for...13877685335268

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com