Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-24-2010, 04:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Alberta Canada
Posts: 744

redyaris - '07 Toyota Yaris
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.54 mpg (US)

Gray - '07 Suzuki GS500 F
Motorcycle
90 day: 70.4 mpg (US)

streamliner1 - '83 Honda VT500 streamliner
Motorcycle
90 day: 75.63 mpg (US)

White Whale - '12 Sprinter 2500 Cargo Van
90 day: 22.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 81
Thanked 75 Times in 67 Posts
Fuel Consumption Economics...???

There seem to be so many ways to look at the economics of better fuel consumption. the most commone is raturn on investment, which argues that if you spend $250/yr to get a $25/yr saveings on fuel the 10yr return on investment is not very good.
I prefer to look at what the average North American spends on fuel, which is aprox $4000/yr and compare that to what I spend on fuel per year, which is Aprox $1000/yr. The way I look at it I can spend $3000/yr on reducing my fuel consumption by $25/yr and still be no worse off than the average person. What say You...?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-24-2010, 05:09 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Live in Tucson AZ, work and car now in Detroit
Posts: 200

Protege - '97 Mazda Protege DX
90 day: 46.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
I approach it a little different:
If I invest $150 on new shocks/struts that lower my car by a 1/2 inch. This saves me (just guessing) 1/2 MPG - saving me 10 dollars in gas a year. Then my your right my payback period is 15 years which is not a good investment. (Longer then the remaining life of the car).
However, If I perform A-B-A tests, document my results, post them here then hundreds of other people will learn from me and I'll make the world a better place. That is worth the $150 investment.
If my shocks/struts need replacing anyway and I just happen to buy ones that are 1/2 inch shorter, and they cost the same as the factory replacments, then they are "FREE" because I would have to buy them anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2010, 05:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...depends upon WHOM you're "comparing" results against:

1) YOURSELF -- comparing your own progress is best because you can incrementally see what you've improved.

2) OTHERS -- comparing your progress against others (which are typically really "average" others), leaves you static...because the "average" moves VERY little, both up & down, due to the isolation resulting from being "...one of many..."

...YMMV, but I've always preferred "self" over "others"--all three of us--me, myself and I--(wink,wink)!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2010, 02:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
It's not the money. It's like performance mods, which might cost hundreds or thousands to gain a few mph or shave a few tenths of a second off 0-60 times. Now is the time saved in travelling worth the cost, by any rational argument?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 04:09 AM   #5 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
redyaris -

I don't do it for the money, but I think it pays for itself :



Based on the above, in about 34 months I have saved $2400, aka about $70 per month or about $840 per year.

From my POV that means I could spend $70 per month on mods and not "lose" any money.

The real "spend" for me has not been money as much as it has been *effort*. If I add that to the equation, then it's probably not worth it. But that's where the hobby part comes in.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
redyaris (09-26-2010), SoobieOut (10-23-2010)
Old 09-26-2010, 07:05 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
i'm fairly new to hypermiling, and as such i'm still trying to figure out how to quantify the savings..

My current approach is to log:

additional mileage OVER the official figures
Saved running costs VS official figures
Total cost per mile (for the saab only) including purchase price and taxing/servicing
Cost per mile for fuel and servicing for the clio

I feel these give me an idea of the fiscal advantages..

I may also consider working out the miles i offset by providing a car share with my colleague.

I have not yet started modifying any of the vehicles
-when i do, i'll try to keep a cost log to allow others to figure out the cost of each mod
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 07:47 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
It's not the money. It's like performance mods, which might cost hundreds or thousands to gain a few mph or shave a few tenths of a second off 0-60 times. Now is the time saved in travelling worth the cost, by any rational argument?
Lets say I get ~20mpg (50/50 city highway) by going ~30 mph city and ~70mph highway (50mph average speed), and that I get ~30mpg by going ~25mph city and ~55mph highway (~40mph average speed). If I drive 15000 miles/year at the higher speeds then I'll spend ~75 hours less in the car and pay ~$750 more for gas, which is a marginal rate of ~$10/hour more to drive faster. This is ignoring any additional wear and tear from going faster, increased risk of getting in an accident from higher speeds, tickets, or higher insurance premiums from the last two, that will all add to the marginal cost

Now that we have figured out the minimum it costs to drive faster, in order to determine if it's worth it, we need to ask ourselves how much do we value work versus driving. If we like driving twice as much as work then it only makes sense to drive faster if we net $20+/hour or more. If we like work twice as much, then we have to net $5+/hour at work. It all depends on the actual difference in mileage/time given different driving behavior and personal preference. Understanding marginal cost versus personal preference gives us a good idea about what is worth doing financially and personally.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to roflwaffle For This Useful Post:
cfguy2000 (04-25-2011), redyaris (09-26-2010)
Old 09-26-2010, 08:30 AM   #8 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482

Iron Horse (retired) - '97 Iron horse Intrepid

Ninja - '08 Kawasaki 250R
90 day: 76.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 44 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
redyaris -

I don't do it for the money, but I think it pays for itself :



Based on the above, in about 34 months I have saved $2400, aka about $70 per month or about $840 per year.

From my POV that means I could spend $70 per month on mods and not "lose" any money.

The real "spend" for me has not been money as much as it has been *effort*. If I add that to the equation, then it's probably not worth it. But that's where the hobby part comes in.

CarloSW2
CarlosSW2,
Were you at EPA values when you started getting into the fuel game? Most are not so your numbers are probably better than that I know you don't so it for the money just using you for an example.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 08:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ˙
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
Also the gains are much broader than personal or monetary, we gain skills and knowledge in the attempts. and if people are willing to experiment and document well what works and what doesn't, then we all gain.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2010, 09:30 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510

Hot Tamale - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
We also gain a smaller carbon footprint and less dependence on foreign oil.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Glossary Take II SVOboy Forum News & Feedback 50 12-29-2022 08:09 PM
Please explain DFCO (Deceleration Fuel Cut Off) trikkonceptz EcoModding Central 47 12-12-2010 04:34 AM
1.8L Prius ICE 'idle' fuel consumption bwilson4web Hybrids 3 08-16-2010 05:36 PM
ElmScan + Customized Scantool Software = data logging! cfg83 Instrumentation 19 08-08-2010 09:24 PM
Restricted fuel system affect mpguino readings? wagonman76 OpenGauge / MPGuino FE computer 1 09-09-2008 01:34 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com