Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2021, 06:58 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Austria
Posts: 7

Citroen C5 - '13 Citroen C5 III (Brake) Tourer

Citroen C5 - '13 Citroen C5 III (Brake) Tourer
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Improving turbo performance with equal length headers?

I heard a lot of contradicting claims concerning equal length headers used in turbo engines.

Some say the equally spaced exhaust pulses will get the turbo to spool up faster and improve efficiency, others say the heat loss over the longer headers will lead to less exhaust energy to reach the turbine wheel.

Couldn't the second problem be solved by insulating the headers and reducing the heat loss?

What are your thoughts on this? Or does anyone have experience with such a modification? Looking forward reading your comments!

If it is of interest: The engine I plan to add this mod to is a 2014 DV6 (1.6HDi) with 115PS

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-27-2021, 07:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 116HDi View Post
I heard a lot of contradicting claims concerning equal length headers used in turbo engines.

Some say the equally spaced exhaust pulses will get the turbo to spool up faster and improve efficiency, others say the heat loss over the longer headers will lead to less exhaust energy to reach the turbine wheel.
Not only heat losses. Exhaust pressure may also decrease inside longer headers and turbo-lag becomes more noticeable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2021, 12:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
The problem with equal length headers on a turbo diesel is more heat loss. Best bet is to probably wrap what you have.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2021, 02:40 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,709
Thanks: 7,778
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
There must be some good reason why the turbos aren't cast right into the heads.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2021, 09:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,156

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820
Thanks: 763
Thanked 637 Times in 424 Posts
Still not that common to have the exhaust manifold cast into the head... although some cars are starting to do this. The first car I had with the is the first gen Honda insight.

But practically, your casting is getting kind of silly if you have the head, exhaust manifold, AND the turbo in there... Makes sense to me to the have the turbo unit separate, even if it's basically just bolted to the side of a cast-in manifold.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2021, 12:59 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,709
Thanks: 7,778
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
I phrased that carefully.

Turbo, head and displacement are all related. No bolting on a bigger unit. OTOH, additive manufacturing means you can make impossibly complex shapes. Rocket motors and Porsche's oil cooled pistons for examples.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2021, 12:58 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 57

The silver bullet - '01 Saturn S Sohc 5 speed
90 day: 40.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 15 Posts
In my experience with turbo air cooled VW and turbo ls builds is that until you get to the extremes of what horsepower a platform is capable of making that the turbo and engine just doesn't give a crap what shape the hot side is in within reason.

Imo after the turbo is where you can see some gains on street able setups. More open is better. There's no such thing as post turbo exhaust scavenging
__________________
Too much junk to list. From a 10mpg caddy limo to a 5 speed Saturn



  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to R.W.Dale For This Useful Post:
freebeard (11-29-2021), JasonG (11-30-2021)
Old 11-29-2021, 03:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,709
Thanks: 7,778
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
3D print a integrated free valve head/turbo and you can sell two to every customer.

Accommodate varied displacements with adding or removing vanes similar to Porsche cooling fans.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2021, 11:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by samwichse View Post
Makes sense to me to the have the turbo unit separate, even if it's basically just bolted to the side of a cast-in manifold.
Even if gassers became turbocharged by default, just like Diesels nowadays, it's worth to consider the cost of replacing a damaged turbo or upgrading it. There might also be some issues with thermal managementt of the engine. A cast-in turbocharger could maybe increase oil temperature through heat irradiation at the cylinder head for instance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2021, 02:18 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,709
Thanks: 7,778
Thanked 8,586 Times in 7,070 Posts
I have no idea about the pluses and minuses. A plenum between the exhaust valve[s] and the spool might be necessary or gathering multiple exhaust pulses (OP's question) in a header; OR less heat energy is lost before the turbo.

__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
diesel, equal length headers, turbo





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com