Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-01-2014, 01:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
That chart is if you hold the airflow constant and change the fuel. However at constant power and speed, leaner requires a bigger throttle opening like Ecky said, and you'll get gains well past 16:1. Honda's lean burn engines ran 22:1 despite poor combustion, because it's more efficient to pump a lot of extra air and not have the gasoline burn completely than to restrict the engine and run stoichiometric with low MAP.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
LeanMeanDSM (06-05-2016)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-01-2014, 01:09 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ever_green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264

gueff - '19 Mercedes Benz A250 4MATIC AMG
90 day: 30.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 79 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
Although going higher may not be the best for fuel economy with all else being equal, by leaning the burn out you can open the throttle plate more and run at a higher load, which helps too. The Insight goes as high as 25:1 or 26:1 sometimes, presumably to keep the throttle plate open.

You would probably be better off running only slightly lean and regearing to get load up, but lean burn is a more versatile and easier way of keeping load high.
I see, so I guess I will stay this lean since I haven't experienced any issues so far. Today I managed to hit 18:1 without issues either. I will have to analyze data logs to see if there is any difference in throttle opening. Stock it's about 15.5% throttle opening at 50% engine load at 2500 RPM or 65 mph. I'm not sure about lean burn at above 2700 RPM. the burn rate might be too slow for engine speed and cause problems. so lean burn will have to be restricted to 65 mph for now.

update: new throttle opening is at 18%. so about 2.5% more opening at 17:1 AFR.
Attached Files
File Type: xls lean_burn_log.xls (41.0 KB, 67 views)

Last edited by ever_green; 12-01-2014 at 04:37 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2015, 03:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: missouri
Posts: 209

Suki - '11 Suzuki SX4
Team Suzuki
90 day: 26.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 62 Times in 34 Posts
Bump!

Just wondering if there are any problems with the setup yet.
__________________
"Ignorance is bliss, but only for the ignorant"-Hypermiler1995
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 09:22 PM   #14 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
On this topic, long ago there was a rather simple stand alone interceptor device with an AFR dial ( you put in the cab)

The kit had a wideband which you put in place of your narrow 02 and then converted it to narrowband for your ECU to be happy, you could then adjust where the narrow band AFR thought STOICH was centered on using the dial.

Anyone remember what this plug was? I can't seem to find the thread. (it wasn't a simple efie)

Also has anyone ever noticed narrow band sensors that do not center on stoich?

Just curious.

Thanx
Ryan
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2015, 09:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,530

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 39.03 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,252
Thanked 583 Times in 375 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
On this topic, long ago there was a rather simple stand alone interceptor device with an AFR dial ( you put in the cab)

The kit had a wideband which you put in place of your narrow 02 and then converted it to narrowband for your ECU to be happy, you could then adjust where the narrow band AFR thought STOICH was centered on using the dial.

Anyone remember what this plug was? I can't seem to find the thread. (it wasn't a simple efie)

Also has anyone ever noticed narrow band sensors that do not center on stoich?

Just curious.

Thanx
Ryan
SDS systems had one like your describing and Haltech had one also. Basically a POT meter that controlled PW by %.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pgfpro For This Useful Post:
LeanMeanDSM (06-05-2016)
Old 03-31-2015, 11:36 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
The kit had a wideband which you put in place of your narrow 02 and then converted it to narrowband for your ECU to be happy, you could then adjust where the narrow band AFR thought STOICH was centered on using the dial.

Anyone remember what this plug was? I can't seem to find the thread. (it wasn't a simple efie)
It's called a narrowband emulator. Innovate LM-1 is the first that shows up on Google. The problem with using one of these is that you can't make the engine run that lean since the idle will have problems.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 05:43 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So i've spent a few weeks trying to track down more info on this. I have the 08 subaru impreza 2.5i AT. I'm having a hard time even getting about 16.5 but i also know i've probably not made tweaks where i should. I've asked for some help in some of the other threads, it would be much appreciated.

I'm no stranger to tuning either. I reverse engineered the chevy pcm's back in the day. Those devices were hard to run.

The good news is no emissions testing here in Montana as well, so if i don't quite hit emissions standards im fine with that for test purposes. Looks like you've put a lot of work into this, let me know if you can share what you've done. It would be very appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 08:23 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
bhazard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 500

2012 Golf TDI - '12 Volkswagen Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 45.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
What are you guys tuning with anyway?

__________________
'05 Outback XT, 19 mpg

BP-turbo 93 Festiva (long gone)
1/4 mile - 12.50@111.5
Best MPG - 36.8
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com