05-30-2009, 08:28 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 333
Thanks: 7
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
Mountains, gliding and wearing out brake rotors and drums
Had 2 new front tyres fitted which increased FE and comfort. Damn those old tyres!
However, the tyre guy showed me considerable wear which has occured on the front disks since I have been EOC down a mountain range almost every day for the last 6 months.
Now I'm gonna be engine braking a lot more when it comes to large downhills....
Incorrect hypermiling just cost me a lot of time and money!
The front disk rotors may need replacing soon.
Grrrr
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-30-2009, 08:31 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
|
I used to always use engine braking, until someone mentioned the relative ease of doing brakes vs clutch work.
|
|
|
05-30-2009, 08:45 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Engine braking doesn't wear the clutch.
|
|
|
05-30-2009, 08:53 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
|
it isn't the braking per se, it is shifting into those lower gears, especially with a conservative blip on the gas.
|
|
|
05-31-2009, 07:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brasil
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
you may reduce clutch wear by revving up the engine while releasing the clutch. Since there is no load and its used only to match rpms the fuel comsumption is minimal and probably will cost you less than clutch wear and much less than brake wear... Also if your car cuts fuel when you are geared but not accelerating, its now wise to EOC and use brakes.
__________________
|
|
|
05-31-2009, 10:31 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Hi,
If you can downshift and use the engine to brake, then you use the same amount of fuel as EOC'ing and you get to not use the brakes. Best of both...
|
|
|
05-31-2009, 10:46 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
If blessed with mountains, I would turn off my injectors and engine brake (hold in the kill switch).
For reference, I did the rotors today, they were $18 apiece, but would still rather use the engine to control my decent and save the brakes for an emergency.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
06-02-2009, 07:31 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 333
Thanks: 7
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
Citroen AX rotors are much harder to find, 3 were crushed and melted recently and I should have grabbed a pair as there are none around here at the moment. Except for my complete and running other 2 AX's, maybe I should wreck/break/part one of them, probably worth more that way anyway, AND I have my rotors right here
Being carburetted I use gas when engine braking, ignition on or off.
Over the last 6 months hardly more than a couple of dollars gas MAXIMUM would have been used, during needed engine braking.
Better than worn rotors. I was penny pinching and look what happened.
|
|
|
06-05-2009, 10:32 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueflame
Citroen AX rotors are much harder to find, 3 were crushed and melted recently and I should have grabbed a pair as there are none around here at the moment. Except for my complete and running other 2 AX's, maybe I should wreck/break/part one of them, probably worth more that way anyway, AND I have my rotors right here
Being carburetted I use gas when engine braking, ignition on or off.
Over the last 6 months hardly more than a couple of dollars gas MAXIMUM would have been used, during needed engine braking.
Better than worn rotors. I was penny pinching and look what happened.
|
I am carbed, but do not notice gas, it would rather the pcv and suck on the engine base in a round about feed. In a way this is good, but the reason for good is too rare to keep it that way. Fuel injection has a thing called "air bypass" when engine braking, it is supposed to just let air in and not the fuel. I was just pondering using the uselss egr valve filtered to open air and let the high vacuum of letting off throttle open it..work like a charm and get it past the carbs venturi, carb would think it was idling
As myfuel is already in the hyper realm, this bypass would make it for anyone to keep acheiving. I know what engine brakes do to natural venturi, alot don't. the king of fuel air and its simple problems...
|
|
|
06-07-2009, 11:15 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Basjoos Wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
|
I would suspect that with the carb, having the throttle closed would reduce the amount of air coming in quite a bit, and so you wouldn't be using the same amount of fuel per rpm as you would if you were powering it to that rpm. The throttle plate is after the venturi, right?
Also, I wonder if you have an electric fuel pump, or the more likely manual fuel pump. If you were lucky enough to have the electric fuel pump, a on off switch for the pump would be nice; you'd only lose the gas in the carb's bowl, and refilling it wouldn't take but a second. But I suspect you'd have a manual fuel pump, which makes it a bit trickier...
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
|
|
|
|
|