Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-31-2011, 10:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
New tires!

It was time for new tires. LRR was a given, but I wanted to do more and go oversize. I've been too busy lately to do real research on LRR, so I bowed to the dark gods of marketing and just went with Goodyear Assurance Fuel Maxes. Then I went over to the tire size calculator over at Miata.net. My car takes 215/45/17s, a size I've never been happy with. It's a pretty rare size and way too little sidewall for dealing with crappy roads. I spent a lot of time dithering between 215/50/17 and 215/55/17, the issue being that I had a stock radius of 12.3". The 50s would take me up to 12.7" and the 55s to 13.2". I figured I could fit another half inch of tire in there, but didn't know if I dared try for a whole inch. I went with the 50s and it turns out I guessed right- at full lock the inside edge of the tire still clears the wheel well. Barely.

Because of all the time I spend gliding the main benefit to me isn't the size, it's the LRR. I'm happy with it- my standard glides are going farther now. My last glide on the way home didn't work, though. I started my second to last glide earlier than usual and didn't have to goose it to get over the last little hill. I made it over the hill, but without enough speed to glide all the way to the stop sign. That's huge: I couldn't glide all the way to my stop because I was still on the previous glide. Viva La Low Résistance!

Where is the size benefit? The 45s got 819 revs per mile, the 50s get 792, and the 55s would have been 767. Now for every turn of the wheel I'm moving 3.4% farther than before (and dreaming of the 6.9% farther that I could have been going on the tires that wouldn't have fit). I'm not going to be measuring this in real time. I couldn't find anything on the net about flashing the ECM to change the tire size, and I called a Subaru dealer to ask and got told no. You can't take that as Truth because dealerships are just as half-assed as any other place, but it's not looking good. The difference is small enough that I'm not worried about getting stopped. Sure, if I've got the cruise at 70 then I'd get tagged for 73 but I've been careful about traffic cops for long enough that I think I can be careful about traffic cops for a little longer. Since I can't change the car's instrumentation I'm not going to change the UltraGauge either, I'm just going to use the 3.4% when I calculate from the pump. That'll be fun to do again- I haven't logged a full tank in quite some time.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-31-2011, 06:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,572 Times in 1,594 Posts
Nice!

I'd up my tire size if it weren't for throwing my gauges off. My tach is spot on right now - only 0.3% off. I've got tons of room to lower my car further though, even with a larger wheel size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 08:26 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
The whole Idea behind runing the gauge is that you can calibrate it exactly.....
Why would you want ALL your gauges off?
I runn a 245/50/18 where factory was 245/45/18. It's almost 6% off. I use the scanguage for my exact mph (and my gps). cant remember the last time I looked at the speedometer.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 08:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
Nice!

I'd up my tire size if it weren't for throwing my gauges off. My tach is spot on right now - only 0.3% off. I've got tons of room to lower my car further though, even with a larger wheel size.
this is almost funny if it wasnt so off base.....
Fact: lowering the height effects the ride. period.
So you'd rather have a crappy ride quality, instead of know that the aftermarket gauge is correct?
PS.....tire size doesnt effect the tach.......the tach measures the ENGINE.

like when your sittting at park......not moving......the tach is still correct.....right?
take the tires off, but the car on jack stands.....the tach is still correct.....right......
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 12:25 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,572 Times in 1,594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post
this is almost funny if it wasnt so off base.....
Fact: lowering the height effects the ride. period.
So you'd rather have a crappy ride quality, instead of know that the aftermarket gauge is correct?
PS.....tire size doesnt effect the tach.......the tach measures the ENGINE.

like when your sittting at park......not moving......the tach is still correct.....right?
take the tires off, but the car on jack stands.....the tach is still correct.....right......
My apologies, I meant odometer. (had taken something to fall asleep before I typed that post)

What I meant to say was, even with larger tires I could still lower my car significantly, possibly to the ground, so it's not a factor stopping me. It's not a shame that larger tires would throw off my odometer and speedometer and that they can't be corrected for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 12:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
sleep deprivation will do that!!!!!
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2012, 02:21 AM   #7 (permalink)
weddingcoo
 
weddingcoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
nice~~~~~
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2012, 12:10 PM   #8 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
Change the distance & speedometer calibrations on your Ultra-gauge. Then you can rely on the UG for your speedometer and trip odometer. There's no need to be flying blind unless you want to.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2012, 12:48 PM   #9 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
I'd rather have them match the car, and "maybe a couple over, depending on how fast you're going" isn't really blind. Instead of keeping the cruise a hair under 70, 80 or whatever to avoid alarms, I'll just leave a little more space. Besides, if I'm not in a hurry I don't need to worry about radar any more and if I am in a hurry it's not going to be the extra 2 or 3 mph that gets me in trouble.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 10:58 AM   #10 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Smile

I finished my first full tank on the new tires, and it's a success. Mileage has been down lately- it's cold and dark and I've got no grille block or kill switch.

I don't have any proper tank logging for some time, but I've been struggling to keep it in the 26 mpg range. This tank read at 27.4 before I factored in the taller size, which rought me to 28.37. I'm happy.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com