Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-25-2012, 04:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
topcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: England
Posts: 37

Celica VVTI - '05 Toyota Celica GT VVTI
Team Toyota
90 day: 41.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
One heat grade colder spark plugs

If I understand correctly, the heat grade of a spark plug is a trade-off between keeping the plug hot to burn off deposits, and keeping it cool to avoid pre-detonation. Car manufacturers will bias this trade-off towards hot because it keeps the service interval longer. Whereas - we ecomodders - could bias this cooler because we don't want pre-detonation. Once the ECU detects pre-detonation (knock) the timing will be permanently retarded until the ECU is reset. Retarded timing means less power is extracted from the fuel, and so worse MPG.

The NGK website says Spark Plug Terms
"When making spark plug Heat Range changes, it is better to err on the side of too cold a plug. Running too cold a plug can only cause it to foul out, whereas running too hot a plug can cause severe engine damage."

So worst case, cooler plugs would just mean checking the plugs more often for fouling.

Will this work to improve MPG???

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-25-2012, 06:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I don't know but your theory sounds good to me.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 07:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Not sure, but in my pickup the retard on the timing is only for a short period, basically once I lift up off of the throttle it resets.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 07:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If one is doing other things that tend to put an engine on the ragged edge of detonation like grille blocks, higher temp thermostats, nearly lugging it, etc., colder plugs may expand the envelope of what you can get away with.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 08:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
Adventurist!
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 144

CLaero - '97 Acura CL Premium
90 day: 34.59 mpg (US)

CR-v - '03 Honda CR-V EX
Team Honda
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
This is done quite a bit in the tuner world, especially those who are tuning under boost and e85... typically they run chipped ECU's or complete FMU's so it's a lot easier to manage ignition timing.

That being said, those who don't have that option (due to emissions testing, budget, etc.) often "trick" the stock ECU in order to gain a few extra degrees of timing... myself included (emissions testing here requires OBD2 port plug in, so I can only run a piggyback)

If you're looking for that few degrees timing, the most common way is to retard the base timing, generally around 4 degrees from stock then reset the ecu (disconnect battery, turn ignition on, press brake pedal 10 times, let sit for a few min, works on most vehicles) and allow the ECU base-map to establish itself (usually around 100mi) and then set the timing to factory specs.

This will give you up to a 4 degree (ECU controlled) increase in timing throughout your load range without exceeding the max OEM timing advance... not sure what it is on your Toyota, but on my Acura it's around 45 degrees.
__________________
'97 Acura CL 2.2L 5spd
'03 Honda CR-V 2.4L EX 4wd Auto
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2012, 09:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
On the other hand, those of us who are good at DWL might need hotter plugs because we spend so much time at low power settings.

Just a thought....
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 10:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...simple "verification" test is to pull a plug every so often and SEE if it's running hot (burnt) or cold (carboned up).
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 02:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hamburg, New York
Posts: 104

Jenny - '02 Chevrolet Prizm Lsi
90 day: 25.21 mpg (US)

Crowley - '23 Ford Maverick XLT
90 day: 27.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
I guess I'll be the Guinea pig. My ranger is timed at 20*btdc with the stock plugs. What I can do is toss in 4 lower heat plugs, unplug the battery, and then get the timing with a timing light. Does that sound like a solid experiment? Or did I miss something? Ill do it this afternoon because now I'm curious. Also, should I go 1 heat range lower, or 2? Maybe 3? It's not my dd and I don't mind blowin it up (that would give me a reason to swap in a smaller motor)

Last edited by BackroadBomber; 11-26-2012 at 02:06 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 03:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
maybe i missed it, but unplugging the battery won't do you much good. the computer constantly adjusts to whatever the conditions are. do you know if you have vacuum advance timing or electronic? with vacuum you may not see any benefit.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2012, 03:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
topcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: England
Posts: 37

Celica VVTI - '05 Toyota Celica GT VVTI
Team Toyota
90 day: 41.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Hey BackroadBomber,
That's great that you are going to give it a try. I don't think you will see instant results with this, only under those limited set of circumstances when pre-detonation would occur. As has been pointed out, that is probably more likely if you have a grille block or other mods to keep the engine hot.

@KSA8907, disconnecting the battery is required after installing the new plugs to clear the ECU of those situations it has already learnt when pre-detonation occurred with the old plugs. i.e. to give it a fresh start and learn the new parameters.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com