Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-14-2010, 02:05 AM   #21 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,707

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,280
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
...This is funny because I acknowledge that over-inflating tires will cause longer braking distances, ...
Not necessarily. Check out the links in this thread:
"Inflation pressure does not affect grip": Autospeed article.
In particular, FEA chapter III. tire pressure survey and test results shows that increasing tire pressure decreases braking distance in most of the tested cases. I'm not sure how far this extrapolates, though.

__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-14-2010, 02:12 AM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JacobAziza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 397

Big Orange Work Truck - '83 Ford F-250
90 day: 27.54 mpg (US)

Jessica's - '04 Toyota Matrix
90 day: 41.21 mpg (US)

Ninjette - '01 Kawasaki Ninja EX250R
Thanks: 44
Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
aw man, you beat me!
I was JUST about to post that link.

Yeah, well... I'm going to do it anyway!!

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...cle-11433.html
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
A few months ago I returned home just as my neighbor pulled into his driveway. It was cold (around freezing) with some rain and sleet, and he yells to me: You rode your bike? In this weather?!?

So the other day we both returned home at the same time again, only now the weather is warm, sunny, with no wind. And I yell to him: You took the car? In this weather?!?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 07:06 AM   #23 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Where's the evidence that overinflation is beneficial? In forty years of reading about cars (and nearly that in owning them) I've yet to come across that benefit quantified.

Debunking a Mileage Myth: Can You Really "Pump Up" Your Fuel Economy? - Popular Mechanics

Is a typical response. It "may" be that some slight percentage pressure increase results in better handling/braking, but on new cars/trucks this is doubtful compared to the vehicles of the 60's and 70's. CAFE standards would seem to make a pressure increase an easy way for the automakers to achieve better numbers.

The problem is tire design & construction: tire tread and tire casing. Long life and higher fuel mileage offset by ride quality, traction, etc. These mean far more to fuel mileage -- by itself -- than ultimate pressure numbers.

In this linked .pdf from Cummins about big truck fuel economy, check the table of contents for the pages on tires. You'll see that to achieve even a 2% increse that the tires are over-inflated by 20% from optimum. The companies I drove for (or the trucks I leased) had company-mandated tire pressures ranging from 100 to 105 psi, sometimes 110, depending on truck, load, position and other. We were advised to never exceed this. And fuel economy was constantly stressed. (And it takes a good half-hour or longer to inflate 18-tires, I can tell you . . and you NEVER have a spare half hour as a truck driver . . . .

http://cumminsengines.com/assets/pdf...whitepaper.pdf

Let's say that the 32-psi tires on a car are really a bit better with some more air. We're willing to give up ride quality. But we'll have to go to 20% over, or 40-psi to achieve it. A 2% gain? On a 22 mpg car that's barely .5 mpg. And it assumes that the vehicle will operate in a steady state environment that the tires warm to operating temperature after 1.5-hours of driving in order to achieve it. A quite narrow, non-realistic "result" since for most driving that 2% won't be achieved.

Meanwhile we accept degraded performance as tire tread / casing design & construction mean more.

All I see is increased risk at a higher cost (tire damage, braking/handling problems, decreased service life) for a gain that isn't quantified.

Driver skill (or other factors) are more likely explanations of "increased mpg via overinflation" for all miles of driving.

Just buy the best tires, observe the placarded numbers and get a tire gauge that can be calibrated. And use it. And work on skills. Trip planning. The day on which we are sick, non-attentive and it's dark outside, rainy and lot's of traffic is the day it all matters. Just once is what it takes.

.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 08:49 AM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
Just buy the best tires, observe the placarded numbers and get a tire gauge that can be calibrated. And use it.
I'm with you on the good tyres and pressure gauge, but the numbers for tyre pressure on the car manufacturer's placards are often way too low !

I originally started to increase the tyre pressure (set at placard numbers) to cure a handling and wear deficiency when I put on 17" wheels.
At the placard values, the car was wobbling on its tyres, while the outside threads were almost melting away like butter in the sun.

But I won't go over the tyre manufacturer's max pressure rating.
Surely they keep a healthy safety margin, and I'd like to use that
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 11:29 AM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JacobAziza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 397

Big Orange Work Truck - '83 Ford F-250
90 day: 27.54 mpg (US)

Jessica's - '04 Toyota Matrix
90 day: 41.21 mpg (US)

Ninjette - '01 Kawasaki Ninja EX250R
Thanks: 44
Thanked 68 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
Where's the evidence that overinflation is beneficial?
.
In the link posted just above your comment:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...cle-11433.html

Tire pressure has no affect on grip in dry weather, higher pressure reduces hydroplaning it wet weather.

I don't overinflate thinking it will cause a jump in MPGs. I overinflate because then it takes time to get back down to max. If I start at max, and it is constantly losing a tiny amount of pressure, I am always below max.
And while going over won't help MPG or handling (very much) going under can hurt both (more significantly).
And I don't feel like checking it every single day or two.
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
A few months ago I returned home just as my neighbor pulled into his driveway. It was cold (around freezing) with some rain and sleet, and he yells to me: You rode your bike? In this weather?!?

So the other day we both returned home at the same time again, only now the weather is warm, sunny, with no wind. And I yell to him: You took the car? In this weather?!?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 12:33 PM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
tim3058's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northeast
Posts: 147

Silver Bullet - '86 Chevy Camaro Z28
90 day: 19.74 mpg (US)

New Blue - '96 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 20.46 mpg (US)

Diesel - '96 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
Last 3: 13.56 mpg (US)

Tahoe #2 - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LS
90 day: 13.05 mpg (US)

SuperDuty - '08 Ford F-350 dually Lariat
90 day: 9.34 mpg (US)

Fundai - '09 Hyundai Elantra
90 day: 26.45 mpg (US)

HRV - '17 Honda HRV LX
90 day: 31.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Good info there Slowmover, but is there a possibility that a stiff heavy-truck tire's mpg's would be less dependent on tire pressure than a passenger car tire? I agree if it were a significant boost you would think the auto mfr's would jump on it, maybe the harsher ride/susp. issues complicate it for them.

I didn't do an actual test, but when I pumped the 44psi max Civic tires up to 50 my butt-o-meter noticed a harsher ride, and reduced rolling resistance. So much so when the front left tire (which has a very slow leak) gets down to 35psi I can tell I need to put air in it by how poorly the car rolls and the slightly higher vacuum to hold highway speed.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 01:30 PM   #27 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sulfuric View Post
I run about 65 on my Bridgestone Ep100, sidewall is 44. BTW tire burst pressure is well over 100psi for undamaged quality tires. The only difference is comfort and possibly higher chances for tire damage is you hit a nail or something bad.
There is safety margin from the sidewall pressure, but it varies with manufacturer, manufacturing process and tire to tire. I don't know where you get your confidence in that much pressure over the limit, but I do not share it; I think you are being reckless. Where did you get the burst data? Certainly NOT from the manufacturer, which would be the one source you might be able to trust.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 01:36 PM   #28 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JacobAziza View Post
Most of my experience is from bicycles, so it may not be a direct comparison. It may not be relevant at all.

Running any less than rated sidewall pressure (on a bike) gets you a slight decrease in ride bumpiness (slight enough to be irrelevant if you have suspension) at the cost of not only more rolling resistance, but also noticeably worse handling.
This is because if the tire isn't stiff, it flexes a little in the corners.
Further, unless traveling on loose dirt or mud or snow, having low pressure does exactly zero for traction and braking.
I consider the number on the sidewall to be THE recommended pressure, not the maximum.

I don't remember who it was, or what the post topic was, but somebody on this forum once claimed that high tire pressure does not in fact adversely affect braking distance (on a smooth dry surface) as is commonly assumed.

AFAIK the biggest reason not to exceed the sidewall max is that the tire and/or rim is only so strong, and if you go over by enough it can literally explode. For the purpose of avoiding lawsuits, the manufacturer picks a number well under the actual maximum a rim/tire can handle.

Not that I ever drive at the limits of the tire's ability, but I haven't found running high to have any adverse affect on braking or handling or tire wear on my motorcycle or truck.
I run the truck at 85-90 (rated at 80)
Bicycle tires have a round profile and do not have any structure. Their sidewall pressure rating IS the recommended pressure; you are correct, lower pressures increase rolling resistance because you increase the contact patch due to no tire structure. Car and truck tires are completely different, and the sidewall pressure rating IS the MAXIMUM rating.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 01:56 PM   #29 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
Where's the evidence that overinflation is beneficial? In forty years of reading about cars (and nearly that in owning them) I've yet to come across that benefit quantified.
Shoot. I know I've seen some A/B/A testing around here somewhere, but a quick look failed to turn up the thread. I know I have also seen quite a number of posts (more than a dozen) where people noted longer glide distances (in some cases, instrumented) after inflating their tires to sidewall maximum.

In my own case, I have tested three different tires on one of my cars for best cornering grip with different tire pressures. Acceleration and braking were not important to me when I did those tests, but in all cases I found that the best grip was achieved with pressures higher than the placard pressures. (This is for hard-compound true street tires, not R-compound tires nor the not-quite-R compound "street tire class" tires that are now popular in some circles.)

Every tire will have a pressure range where it grips the best. In every case that I know of (for passenger car tires), this pressure range is above the placard pressure that the vehicle manufacturer recommends. It is often not the same as the max sidewall pressure, but the max pressure has always (for me so far!) given better cornering grip than the placard pressures.

For those in the "I won't give up any grip because it's a safety margin" camp: You already have. If you're not running racing slicks, you've already given up grip. You have compromised the grip for minor concerns like being legal to use on the street, actually having some grip in the cold or wet, having some puncture resistance, and so on. So the question becomes: Which set of compromises do you pick?

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2010, 02:48 PM   #30 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
UFO -

Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
There is safety margin from the sidewall pressure, but it varies with manufacturer, manufacturing process and tire to tire. I don't know where you get your confidence in that much pressure over the limit, but I do not share it; I think you are being reckless. Where did you get the burst data? Certainly NOT from the manufacturer, which would be the one source you might be able to trust.
(CapriRacer, sorry in advance if I am misquoting you)

I agree. CapriRacer commented on Max PSI. I believe that he said something akin to "as long as you drive the way we are driving, sidewall max PSI is ok, but inflation above Max tire PSI is not ok". Here are 200+ posts on the subject :

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ires-2582.html

The gist of the argument is that the manufacturer does not *test* the tire above Max rated PSI, so you are "on your own" in terms of whether or not the tire can handle the extra pressure.

I think the GM EV-1 had tires inflated to 50 PSI to aid in reducing rolling resistance :

GENERAL MOTORS EV1 VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS
http://avt.inel.gov/pdf/fsev/eva/genmot.pdf
Quote:
TIRES
Tire Mfg: Michelin
Tire Model: Proxima RR Radial
Tire Size: P175/65R14
Tire Pressure F/R: 50/50 psi
Spare Installed: No; Self Sealing Tires
CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top 5 most fuel efficient tires (Lowest Rolling resistance: LRR) blackjackel General Efficiency Discussion 144 01-25-2016 11:39 PM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 69 12-27-2014 01:17 PM
Tips needed for eco-driving my diesel truck! nubbzcummins Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 65 12-07-2010 01:37 PM
Bridgestone Tires and LRR gone-ot EcoModding Central 30 05-04-2010 12:31 PM
New Wheels & Tires trikkonceptz Success Stories 9 11-03-2008 02:05 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com