04-14-2010, 05:55 PM
|
#101 (permalink)
|
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Ah, that's the one. 175/70-13 I see in the list - my size.
A couple of the others are available in 14's. GY Fuel Max and Br Ecopia that I found.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 06:08 PM
|
#102 (permalink)
|
|
Manic Rabbit
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
just need to see if I can find them localy, Tire Rack has great prices until you tack on the shipping
__________________
-Edward
Driven on Colorado roads, where NOTHING is flat
Present City 3x / Highway 4x
Goal: 4x / 5x 
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 10:40 PM
|
#103 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
The Nokian H is available in several 14" sizes:
Quote:
Nokian H
175/65 R 14 82
185/65 R 14 90
185/60 R 14 82
185/55 R 14 80
|
Nokian i3 tires come in quite a few 13" and 14" sizes:
Quote:
Nokian i3
155/70 R 13 75
165/70 R 13 79
175/70 R 13 82
175/70 R 13 82
165/65 R 13 77
165/70 R 14 81
175/70 R 14 84
185/70 R 14 88
195/70 R 14 91
165/65 R 14 79
175/65 R 14 82
185/65 R 14 86
185/60 R 14 82
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 05:25 AM
|
#104 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: India
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks for the information.
I really do not know Big Tyre help to save fuel .
__________________
Used car Ireland - ukdirect.ie
|
|
|
|
|
04-15-2010, 10:38 AM
|
#105 (permalink)
|
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
At another site, a member in a Fit was averaging 65+ mpg. He replaced TWO tires for a very high rolling resistance model, and his mileage dropped below 60. Imagine if he had replaced all four! 
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
|
|
05-31-2010, 06:40 PM
|
#106 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
LRR Tires - Bridgestone Insignia SE200 - 89S vs. 89T
I just had four new tires installed on my 2007 Corolla and the technician installed two p195/65/R15 Bridgestone Insignia SE200 89Ss and two 89Ts. The little I know about tires tells me that the S/T refers to the speed rating. I also found that the 89Ts are manufactured in the US and the 89Ss in Japan. The technician claims that the 89T is the latest model and is better in every way. Does anyone know which of these two tires is better, or is there any difference? Does one have a lower rolling resistance rating? I am going back tomorrow to exchange out two of the tires, should I have them put on two new 89Ss or 89Ts? Thanks ahead of time for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
05-31-2010, 07:40 PM
|
#107 (permalink)
|
|
Tire Geek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by modestmoose
I just had four new tires installed on my 2007 Corolla and the technician installed two p195/65/R15 Bridgestone Insignia SE200 89Ss and two 89Ts. The little I know about tires tells me that the S/T refers to the speed rating. I also found that the 89Ts are manufactured in the US and the 89Ss in Japan. The technician claims that the 89T is the latest model and is better in every way. Does anyone know which of these two tires is better, or is there any difference? Does one have a lower rolling resistance rating? I am going back tomorrow to exchange out two of the tires, should I have them put on two new 89Ss or 89Ts? Thanks ahead of time for your help.
|
According to Tire Rack, there are 3 versions of 195/65R15 BS SE200's - and the one from Canada, and the US are not labled LRR, but the one from Japan is. |
|
|
|
|
06-05-2010, 09:40 PM
|
#108 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...wonder when Nokian will get around to offering larger 16" diameter tyres (tires)?
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2010, 09:37 PM
|
#109 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...the TIRE RACK™ tests:
 |
|
|
|
|
06-21-2010, 08:50 PM
|
#110 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
|
From the Consumer Reports website:
The new formulations seem to be working: Both new tire models fared well; the Michelin (Energy Saver A/S) was exceptional. It not only had the lowest rolling resistance of any allseason tire we’ve tested but also scored Very Good in dry and wet braking. It ranks second among all T-rated all-season tires.
The Cooper (GFE) finished midpack in the group. Its rolling resistance was not as low as the Michelin’s, but it performed well in all-weather grip, hydroplaning resistance, and emergency handling.
By comparison, the Goodyear Assurance Fuel Max, the model that had the lowest rolling resistance in our November 2009 test (available to subscribers), rated somewhat lower among the highly competitive performance H-rated tires, though it performed well in most respects and displayed decent allweather grip.
|
|
|
|
|
