09-20-2008, 11:26 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 109
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
If they put that into mass prodution even if they had to comprimise the milage a touch it should be able to be produced at a very low cost ie. sub $10.000, then we might see a shift in driving taste etc.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-21-2008, 10:30 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Hiya,
Here's a better looking version, that says it will be produced in 2010:
dealership-car: VW to produce 235mpg car for 2010
Plastic and magnesium (not carbon fiber like the prototype) and a 300cc engine, for 235mpg (not 283 of the prototype) -- produced in limited quantities.
|
These must all be fake, since I've seen that picture many times, but without the ugly blue car on it,
|
|
|
09-21-2008, 10:34 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, NH
Posts: 451
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Hiya,
Here's a better looking version, that says it will be produced in 2010:
dealership-car: VW to produce 235mpg car for 2010
Plastic and magnesium (not carbon fiber like the prototype) and a 300cc engine, for 235mpg (not 283 of the prototype) -- produced in limited quantities.
|
This image dates back to July, 2007.
Preview: VW’s 235MPG project - MotorAuthority - Car news, reviews, spy shots
Carbon fiber would still make up the tub with a plastic body. I don't know where the magnesium goes, but you have no idea how expensive it is. $$$
$31K-47K (I expect closer to the higher number) is a lot for a car with a top speed of 72 mph. They're talking about adding hybrid technology to aid drivability and low end acceleration. They're asking a 300 cc engine to push a 660 lb (empty) vehicle. Aerodynamics aside, trying to accelerate an 800+ lb (w/driver) vehicle would take some serious help. Now add a lardass passenger like me. You'll time this thing with a calendar instead of a stopwatch. BTW, the hybrid will weigh even more.
This is the ultimate niche car that does only one thing really well: get great fuel mileage on flat ground at (barely) highway speeds. A fun exercise for the guys down at the prototype shop that got out of control.
__________________
|
|
|
09-21-2008, 04:51 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
EcoMod Wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 448
Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 11 Posts
|
uh... did anyone else notice that the passengers are twins?
__________________
|
|
|
09-21-2008, 07:13 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
What a death trap.
|
|
|
09-21-2008, 09:10 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
compare apples to watermellons
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperTrooper
|
First, 300cc isn't that small for a motorcycle (it is small for one in the states). The darling of beginners, the ninja 250cc, has considerable acceleration to highway speeds, and can go 100mph (note this is using a 20 year old engine, not the new EFI outside the US). The VW1l should have sightly slower acceleration (slow for a bike, fast for a high mileage car) and a much higher top speed. Look at that thing again, and tell me that Cd x frontal area is more than 1/10th a 3.0l (3000cc) car. That thing is *small*, and should have no trouble going to the VW limit of 150(?)mph.
As far as I know, magnesium is pretty cheap (similar to steel, lots cheaper than aluminum). The catch is that once you include enough to match the strength of steel, you've used the weight of steel and spent more...
I won't argue that this is a gimmick car (or an overpriced motorcycle). As mentioned, the ninja gets ~70mpg for 3.5k (new) (talk about diminishing returns). As far as safety, wear a helmet, and don't pretend it isn't a fancy motorcycle.
|
|
|
09-22-2008, 07:22 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
What a death trap.
|
And motorcycles aren't? At least you have protection from the weather elements in this. It looks fun riding in this bobsled.
__________________
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 01:08 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marana, AZ
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
What a death trap.
|
Safety features include simulated crash tests, front crush zone with crush tubes that leave the footwell unaffected, safety belts, airbag, rollover protection, 4-wheel disk brakes and antilock braking system (ABS), low center of gravity and electronic stability program (ESP), rearview video cameras, parking brake, electronic door lock, LEDs for interior illumination at night, and remote keyless entry. The safety standard of the Volkswagen 1-Liter Car is equivalent to that of a GT race car.
^ This is 6 year old technology. Rest assured the car has been improved upon since then.
Last edited by Hasbro; 09-23-2008 at 08:51 AM..
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 02:11 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Auburn, NH
Posts: 451
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wumpus
First, 300cc isn't that small for a motorcycle (it is small for one in the states). The darling of beginners, the ninja 250cc, has considerable acceleration to highway speeds, and can go 100mph (note this is using a 20 year old engine, not the new EFI outside the US). The VW1l should have sightly slower acceleration (slow for a bike, fast for a high mileage car) and a much higher top speed. Look at that thing again, and tell me that Cd x frontal area is more than 1/10th a 3.0l (3000cc) car. That thing is *small*, and should have no trouble going to the VW limit of 150(?)mph.
As far as I know, magnesium is pretty cheap (similar to steel, lots cheaper than aluminum). The catch is that once you include enough to match the strength of steel, you've used the weight of steel and spent more...
I won't argue that this is a gimmick car (or an overpriced motorcycle). As mentioned, the ninja gets ~70mpg for 3.5k (new) (talk about diminishing returns). As far as safety, wear a helmet, and don't pretend it isn't a fancy motorcycle.
|
The article says they expect it to "reach" 120km/h, which converts to 72 mph. It comes down to how fast can you spin a diesel? Maybe 3K rpm. The Ninja twin makes its power by turning 11K+ rpm and is pushing a vehicle that weighs half the VW. The single cylinder diesel in the prototype made 8.5 hp and 13.5 lb/ft of torque. For reference the Ninja makes 36 hp and 18 lb/ft torque. Torque provides acceleration and horsepower provides top speed. Both have 6 speed transmissions, so top speed on the VW is sacrificed to provide "adequate" acceleration.
It's gonna be sloooooow.
__________________
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 02:22 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Hiya,
Yeah, it may have to pushed to go as fast as we normally drive. Whatever -- it gets 235mpg fer cryin' out loud!
The Loremo weights about twice as much as the Liter car (prototype, anyway), and it is due to have two choices of diesels: a 20HP, 157mpg version that gets 150+mpg, and a 50HP, 85mpg version. The former goes from 0-60 in ~17-20 seconds, and the latter goes from 0-60 in ~10 seconds. Oh, the Loremo seats 2 adults and 2 kids/small adults.
|
|
|
|