Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-10-2011, 03:35 PM   #51 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: arkansas, little rock
Posts: 75
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
i dont care for ethanol, i havent noticed much difference when i have found non ethanol, my complaint is my car and the car manufacturer i work for dont recommend it. around 50,000 miles the ethanol and the alloy in the fuel rails while react and create a blockage. this is a pain in the @$$. i have already pulled the intake and then rails and injectors on my car and found some build up. other cars get towed in and have completely blocked injectors and rails. this is of course warrantied and that pays like $&^$. but i dont have a choice i only knew of one station that had ethanol free. and it was a 20 minute drive, plus .15 cents extra per gallon.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-10-2011, 04:38 PM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
"Despite extensive research, biofuels are still not commercially competitive.
Ethanol is competitive in Brazil.

E85 is big in Sweden - and one of the reasons you'll see high CO2/km values being reported for new cars in Sweden, despite their conscious ways to deal with nature.

(100%) Biodiesel is on the way out in the EU because you can't use it in diesels with particulate filters - even low % blends are adding to the problems.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2011, 05:45 PM   #53 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Cellulosic ethanol start-ups: Harvesting a new kind of fuel | StarTribune.com
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 04:21 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
A - 3 tanks of E0 = 34.63 mpg
B - 3 tanks of E10 = 34.94 mpg
A - 3 tanks of E0 = 36.24 mpg

My mpg is still trending up due to driving changes, but last 3 tanks of E0 made +3% jump, with one tank at 37.74 mpg. I also wonder it it takes my computer a little while to adjust to different blends so sticking with E0 a few more tanks.


Last edited by roosterk0031; 08-17-2011 at 05:37 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com