Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-16-2010, 02:28 AM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Any updates on this? Wait for results.


Dan

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-16-2010, 03:04 AM   #32 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 12

The Beast - '97 Ford F-350 XL
90 day: 12.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's funny I had been thinking about a post I need to do on here. My mileage has been crap, 10.5 - 11.5 when not 90% highway which got me 12.5 Loaded unloaded made zero difference. neutral at stops vs in gear made no difference. I've been compensating by driving the truck minimally. I swear I drive like grandma with a broken right foot but it's just horrible.

Anyways I got a clunk from the front end last weekend and noticed that when I first touched the brakes they seemed to be sticking so I went in to get the brakes looked at.

Long story short $3400 later I've got all new everything from the master cylinder down. The brakes where all partially sticking and one had just gotten worse that I noticed. I filled up 20 km before getting the work down. so far I've only put 220 km on it but just going by the gauge and the extra pickup the truck now has I'd say I should easily improve on my current average. I used to go 300-350 km on the front tank. The gauge says E at 250-260 normally. right now at 220 it's at half... So in a few more weeks when I fill up again I'll update the tracker on here and post an update in this thread.

I will note that I bought a scanguage and really really wish I had been able to use it. even thought the truck is a 97 it's not obd2. I still haven't seen a vacuum gauge while I'm out and about and haven't decided to order one in yet. my wallet is a lot lighter after the brakes...

Last edited by strider3700; 03-16-2010 at 03:16 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 03:33 AM   #33 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Yeah it those gear in axle.

My F250 never gotten 11 or above. It exact one you have but it reg cab with flatbed.


Fun 96 E350 351W with 3.55 in axle got 16-17 on hwy but honest it little weak on hill couldn't use 2-3 gears it struggle Hill were 20-25% grade so it tough.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 03:34 AM   #34 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
You could try is remove cat convetor I been heard reports improve 1-5 mpg by do that.


Anywhere I am replaced 95 F250 4wd with 91 F250 2wd so I could put 3.55 then able use truck for work.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 06:02 AM   #35 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milwaukee View Post
You could try is remove cat convetor I been heard reports improve 1-5 mpg by do that.
Oh please.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 10:22 AM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Oh please.
Do you have proof answer that it doesn't improve mpg?


When it get old and that truck doesn't drive long enough it become plugged.


We just remove one on 91 Bronco and mpg from 14 went to 16 on HWY at same speed I go.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 11:55 AM   #37 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
The point is removing a cat is illegal, and socially irresponsible. It's like winning a litter pick-up contest by dumping your garbage in everyone else's territory. You could remove your muffler, too. And drive with no lights on at night. All great fuel saving mods....
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg

Last edited by SentraSE-R; 03-16-2010 at 12:14 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SentraSE-R For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (03-16-2010)
Old 03-16-2010, 05:37 PM   #38 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milwaukee View Post
Do you have proof answer that it doesn't improve mpg?
I answer proof all over site.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 06:02 PM   #39 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Oh well how come I see tons 90's Chevy with TBI blow black smoke they should be banned.


cat convector on F350 is weight almost 30 pound it size of guard pole where people hit with car.



You could try unplug injector and see if it does improve mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 01:52 PM   #40 (permalink)
Jeep Ecomodder
 
JeepNmpg2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 160

Daddy's Jeep - '00 Jeep Cherokee SE
90 day: 19.66 mpg (US)

Mama's Kia - '06 Kia Sedona LX
Thanks: 16
Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts
OK, before things get out of control here

I for one am an advocate of replacing a plugged up cat with a free-er flowing model, but it still needs to be "legal" and do what it's made to do - clean the air coming out of the engine (had the same problem myself). Does it really improve FE, I don't really know.

My commute has now changed to half rural, half city driving vice 90% highway and I've still managed to improve mileage by re-teaching my right foot how to make my auto trans work for me.

I should have my scanguage next week, so I'm looking forward to more "foot training" as I learn what exactly my engine is doing.

I definately agree with the vacuum guage option, it kind of gives your right foot a conscience when you're trying to beat the clock getting somewhere.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com