Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-30-2019, 09:16 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
"for cheap" is relative, but a good source is McMaster-Carr: www.mcmaster.com. I used their P/N 6000K1 belt for my air dam: https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...dam-34650.html.

__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-30-2019), gmguy64 (01-03-2020)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-30-2019, 11:25 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmguy64 View Post
Where is the best place to order conveyor belt material for cheap?
I got mine from the local Tractor Supply store, but last time I checked they changed up what they were carrying to pre-cut lengths of limited depths.

Maybe but now they have changed back to the larger sizes and by the foot lengths.

Was not "cheap" but has lasted 7 years and still going strong (no fuss, no worries).
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-02-2020), gmguy64 (01-03-2020), slowmover (12-31-2019)
Old 12-31-2019, 06:06 AM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Lowering helps in terms of stability. But cuts wheel travel.

Lowering helps in terms of crosswind-handling.

The second of those can be addressed with a skirt. The first means it may take less to upset straight-ahead travel.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-02-2020)
Old 12-31-2019, 06:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,692
Thanks: 7,774
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
Quote:
Lowering [done right] helps in terms of stability. But cuts wheel travel.
The various suspension types have a 'roll center'. It can vary from the ground to at least the axle centerline. Were it higher, the vehicle would lean like a motorcycle (desirable but complicated).

Optimal is to have a line between the front and rear roll centers be as level as possible.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-02-2020), slowmover (12-31-2019)
Old 01-03-2020, 04:56 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10

Casper - '02 Toyota Corolla S
Thanks: 14
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
I appreciate everyone's feedback as I begin this eco-modding journey!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gmguy64 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-04-2020), BamZipPow (01-03-2020), freebeard (01-03-2020)
Old 02-26-2020, 11:50 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 42
Thanks: 12
Thanked 40 Times in 27 Posts
I have a 1998 Ranger XLT (first year for coil-spring front, twin I-beam is 1997-earlier) 2WD supercab with the same drivetrain: 2.5 Lima 4, 5 speed manual, 3.73 7.5” rear. My aero improvement attentions are currently focused on the huge, blocky commercial cap on the bed, but I do want to clean up the front some more after that. An air dam is high on that list, as my truck has a front receiver hitch that eliminated the factory dam. I’m thinking about a 2” drop using the DJM control arms with the stock springs. An aftermarket flipped rear leaf shackle/hanger combo can buy you a bit of drop at modest cost.

My truck hasn’t always had that (or any) cap on it. Best MPG thus far was 27.28 (open bed, empty), worst was 18.18 (commercial cap with roof rack, medium load, towing a trailer). I use it to haul, tote, and occasionally tow, no dedicated data-collecting runs, so take what you will from that.

My best MPG in a Lima 4 Ranger (this is #3 for me) was 30 in a 1996 zero-option (no AC, radio delete, bench seat rubber mat) 2.3 5M short cab/short bed with a cab-height Snugtop fiberglass cap.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Interstatement For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-29-2020)
Old 02-27-2020, 01:18 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,692
Thanks: 7,774
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
The mods can split off a new thread if you like.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2020, 12:19 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,892
Thanks: 23,969
Thanked 7,221 Times in 4,648 Posts
98 Ranger

All you listed sounds good.Soften the leading edges of the bed box as much as you can.We know from Cambridge University of one vehicle (the Audi A2 ) which did not respond to lowering.However,the Gale Banks racing team used lowering of the 1989 GMC S-15 to get it down to Cd 0.315,from Cd 0.475.I suspect that there's a high probability that the drop will help you.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com