Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-20-2012, 01:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron OH
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Lethedethius Send a message via Yahoo to Lethedethius
2004 Silverado 4.3 V6 Vortec

Ok so I am implementing various aero mods theoretically at this point,

However I thought of upgrading the ignition system.

My understanding of truly getting a better spark is to start from the very beginning, meaning replacing the cap and rotor, the coil, the wires, and the spark plugs.

I read a lot about the Halo spark plugs which sound-phenomenal but probably a phony dream. Also the E3, Champion, NGK as well as Pulstar plugs were on the list.

I once had a guy at Oreilly tell me to avoid NGK in my american built motor but I'm starting to disregard that, I had great feedback in my 93 Civic (it's sold now). I would imagine they put the same talent into anything they build.

I am also working on a 1972 El Camino, pretty much upgrading the entire electrical system to MSD standards. My goal is to replace the old worn out components with something that will create a much cleaner and complete burn.

Three Areas of Focus:

What to avoid(meaning irridium, platinum, silver tips).

With no regard for the wallet (meaning MSD everything or ACCEL Everything)

Moderate electrical gains keeping the change in my pocket (Is there a Bosche component that accomplishes similar results)

Any feedback is appreciated but please don't tell me to not bother with the electrical system. A fact of life, cleaner burn means higher efficiency, which means longevity of the engine and less gas deposits in the oil, which results in changing the oil less.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-20-2012, 01:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Old ignitions systems had lots of room for improvement. Newer ones, not so much.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 01:40 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron OH
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Lethedethius Send a message via Yahoo to Lethedethius
What about increasing the grounds on the silverado? Would that help in a minor way? I know that increasing grounds on any vehicle will create better clarity in sound and make headlights brighter, I know this through research of my own as well as reading others.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If the ground is already a good low/no resistance connection, does adding another one make it gooder?

Maybe. Can't hurt. Maybe if the original one starts to deteriorate the extra one takes over. Or the extra one goes right to a component that needs grounding, instead of taking a circuitous path.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,572 Times in 2,836 Posts
A 2004 GM product may be old enough to benifit from an injector up grade.
Just up grading injectors to the newest generation had been fairly popular for fuel injected vehicles made before 2001.

Out of site aero mods will likely produce the most results by far for the lowest cost.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
IMHO, I wouldn't waste money on spark plugs other than OEM recommended. Any test I have ever read on the various "improved" plug designs, whether double electrode, quadruple electrode, pulstar, super duper zapster plasma nitride kaboom, etc., are a huge waste of money. I say huge waste, because Pulstars are something like $25 a pop (X6 = $150!!!) and do squat for improvement. Frank Lee nailed it: modern ignition systems like yours don't need any help. If they did, GM would have done it from the factory. Spend your $150 on aeromods, a block heater (if it doesn't already have one) or a taller ratio diff from a scrap yard (or way taller skinny tires and a torch to saw springs to compensate...ha!). But that's just my $0.02.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 02:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron OH
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Lethedethius Send a message via Yahoo to Lethedethius
I like the bit about replacing fuel injectors-though mine are no where near the expiration-so I will keep them.

I have a 72 el camino I'm working on, with it being a project car I may likely patch up the entire underbelly of it-attempt to get it to 20 mpg. My question: what fuel/electrical upgrades can I do to it that would be effective, within reason.

Electric Fuel Injection is out of the question.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 04:06 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
I would leave the El-Camino as a cool project car for the odd cruise, but that's it. The only way to ecomod one of those is to get rid of it and buy something newer and smaller. I highly doubt that cleaning up the underside will make any noticeable difference, as most of the energy waste in that car is in the engine. Old V8s are very efficient at converting fuel into heat and noise, not forward motion. I imagine a tiny 2-barrel carb, smog-sized valves and economy camshaft and a perfect ignition curve in a fresh rebuild might gain a few mpg. Not to mention a ridiculously tall axle ratio and lockup torque converter or manual trans. But at what cost?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 06:49 AM   #9 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Old V8s are very efficient at converting fuel into heat and noise, not forward motion.
Ha- reminds me of my friend's boat tailed Riviera with a 455- goose it from a stop and the front end goes up in the air and twists, but the car doesn't move forward.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 03:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Akron OH
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Lethedethius Send a message via Yahoo to Lethedethius
well I can get a 700R4 Transmission for about $200-400 dollars, I'm sure the transmission would gain me a gallon or two-it's overdrive.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com