Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2015, 04:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 80

Doug - '03 Chrysler PT Cruiser Base
90 day: 31.16 mpg (US)

DR 350 - '92 Suzuki DR 350 S
90 day: 61.09 mpg (US)

Sid the Sloth - '82 Honda Civic CVCC Wagon
Last 3: 35.93 mpg (US)

Rocky - '92 Daihatsu Rocky
Last 3: 24.97 mpg (US)

Mick - '97 Jeep Cherokee XJ UpCountry
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
2005 Malibu Maxx...the strangest wagon



This is essentially the same car I just picked up...on the rear I want to reduce some drag.

Would it be better to extend the roofline at a slight angle downwards instead of the factor spoiler which you can see tapers slightly upwards?
Or would it be better to add a second wing on the rear 'notchback'?

I'm not looking to do anything super dramatic as a full boattail but I think I could make some substantial gains with very little effort on the rear.

Thoughts?

__________________



  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-13-2015, 06:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
gains

The MAXX belongs in the nether world of design.It's not a proper notchback,and it's not a proper squareback.
It is possible that GM has already optimized the C-pillars such that for what it is,it's already optimized for drag.
If you wanted to do some Cardboard And Duct tape (CAD) experiments,you might mess around with a Kamm-like extension extending to the rear of the hatch.
Here is a study Hucho did at Volkswagen with the 1st-gen Golf/Rabbit.Around the 'Template' line he got the lowest drag.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (03-13-2015), Neen (03-15-2015), rumdog (03-14-2015)
Old 03-13-2015, 07:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
You might be interested in this video, since the rear profiles are similar :
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-14-2015), Neen (03-15-2015)
Old 03-14-2015, 01:43 AM   #4 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,512 Posts
I have always considered it as a hatchback, not a wagon. BTW you might consider to take a look at the spoiler used in the Opel Corsa B GSi.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-14-2015), Neen (03-15-2015)
Old 03-15-2015, 01:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 80

Doug - '03 Chrysler PT Cruiser Base
90 day: 31.16 mpg (US)

DR 350 - '92 Suzuki DR 350 S
90 day: 61.09 mpg (US)

Sid the Sloth - '82 Honda Civic CVCC Wagon
Last 3: 35.93 mpg (US)

Rocky - '92 Daihatsu Rocky
Last 3: 24.97 mpg (US)

Mick - '97 Jeep Cherokee XJ UpCountry
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
I have always considered it as a hatchback, not a wagon. BTW you might consider to take a look at the spoiler used in the Opel Corsa B GSi.


I love the buttress look of this spoiler...I might have to investigate this one more

__________________



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Neen For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-17-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com