Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-09-2012, 10:07 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
What about going with REALLY skinny tires. I've found the stock size on the "old" beatle is 155 80r15 ... which is the same height as the 195 60r15 I currently have. Would that be worth looking into?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-09-2012, 02:35 PM   #12 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
What about going with REALLY skinny tires. I've found the stock size on the "old" beatle is 155 80r15 ... which is the same height as the 195 60r15 I currently have. Would that be worth looking into?
It could help your mpg but at what cost? To get the skinny tires to fit properly you will probably need to invest in narrower rims, if you can find them. It may not be a cost effective mod if it takes decades to recoup your investment.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 04:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
Going skinnier would reduce the handling capabilities as well as make it harder to source tires.

What about going lighter rims? Keep properly designed rubber.. Some 10-14lb-ers would offer a couple of mpgs in the city and maybe on the highway too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 04:33 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by COcyclist View Post
It could help your mpg but at what cost? To get the skinny tires to fit properly you will probably need to invest in narrower rims, if you can find them. It may not be a cost effective mod if it takes decades to recoup your investment.
You could keep the same wheels. It would only be 20mm of stretch on each side, and with tall sidewalls. People do this all day long with lowered cars and have no problem.

Look up MetroMPG's tire test. He found that even super skinny space saver spares had worse RR than stock Honda Insight LRR tires.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 04:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Can I ask some silly questions - I have read the original posting again so forgive me if I misunderstand.

What engine is in the car ? 2.0 or 2.3 ?

What gearbox - you say 5 speed, we think manual ?

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com