02-07-2013, 02:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
2014 2.0L Turbo Diesel Cruze is here!
...from the GM website news release this morning:
General Motors | Featured News | GM.com
...and, it's been de-tuned, from 160HP down to 148HP, due to stricter EPA requirements (ugh) !!!
Last edited by gone-ot; 02-07-2013 at 10:18 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Some quotes...
Quote:
|
an advanced 2.0L clean diesel engine that will offer an estimated 42 mpg highway with an automatic transmission
|
Quote:
|
An approximately 4.5-gallon (17 liters) tank in the Cruze Clean Turbo Diesel holds enough diesel emissions fluid to provide at least 10,000 miles (16,000 km) of driving between refills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2013, 06:10 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
Finally something to compete with VW. This may be my next vehicle in 6 years.
Will the car still run properly if the urea tank is empty?
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2013, 06:40 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 338
Thanks: 138
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
|
A very complicated pice of machinery. Oilcooler for the turbo oil, intercooler, ERG system, Urea injection, ordinary turbo, direct injection etc....
A lot of hi-tec parts. Nice milage, but it comes at a price of a highly complicated engine.
Can't help thinking a lot of stuff that can fail?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jyden For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2013, 09:54 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
MPG is not linear police
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 121
Thanks: 7
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Some quotes...
|
I noticed that too. Where is the manual? That would be (and has been for a VW) a deal-breaker for me.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2013, 10:11 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master Ecomadman
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
|
What's all the hype? My old Saturn gets better than 42 mpg on gasoline.
__________________
- Tony
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2013, 10:49 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 17
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
|
But the Cruze Eco gets 40 mpg for thousands less. Not to mention the difference in fuel prices. |
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013, 12:34 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228
Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Will the car still run properly if the urea tank is empty?
|
Nope, assuming the auto industry has the same EPA rules as the heavy truck industry. If a heavy truck runs out of DEF (diesel exhaust fluid, aka "Ad Blue") the truck derates to 5 mph. You do NOT want to run out of DEF. |
|
|
|
|
02-08-2013, 05:04 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
So let me get this straight:
$5000 more than the ECO
$1600 more than a Jetta TDI
No manual transmission option
300LB heavier than the ECO
Same fuel economy as the ECO
Burns expensive diesel fuel
Who is going to buy this?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tjts1 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-08-2013, 10:03 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ohio
Posts: 306
Tetanus - '95 Geo Tracker 4WD Base 90 day: 29.43 mpg (US) 300 - '82 Suzuki GS300 L Last 3: 60.78 mpg (US) Jeep - '98 Jeep XJ Cherokee Limited 90 day: 12.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
|
On the one hand I'm glad to see another diesel small car. On the other hand I'm very disappointed at the specifications... A VW is an already proven platform and would be a better choice as it is now... plus you can get a real transmission (manual) with a VW.
I would bet that the diesel isn't going to be an "option" per say... but more likely an high end trim package which pretty much makes means manual won't be an option.
|
|
|
|
|
