01-18-2014, 10:23 AM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
Good point about the battery. I think this is a prime example of where a cap would help vs 2 monster units.
Im sure if they could do a few 100 more by looking everywhere and reducing the quantity of fluids everything needs. I know some guys anal enough to short the engine a qt of fluid as well as drain the windshield washer and over flow bottle.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 11:12 AM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,016
Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix 90 day: 26.7 mpg (US) SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S 90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile
On that thought he might not want no soda pop can truck either.
|
Gotsta be Bud cans.
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 11:27 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenorm
when Ford went to a rounded aero front around 1997, sales dropped off, but the next gen with a squarer front and sales rebounded.
|
Hmmm... similar thing with the 'Stang, wasn't it? They had a very attractive New Edge Mustang, but then they replaced it with the aerodynamic brick that was the retro Mustang, and sales skyrocketed...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
There have been some comments on here about how sharp broken carbon fiber is. It does not seem perfect for the parts more prone to encountering human flesh.
|
Might be some difference between forged CF used in racing cars and hand-laid carbon-fiber on supercars, but I've never heard of it being a problem during supercar wrecks. And I've never heard of a driver being injured by CF during an F1 wreck... they're more a danger to the tires of other drivers, who stand to get a puncture from the shards that result when CF is used to dissipate the energy of a 100+ mph crash. A crash which would otherwise cause a lot of sharp, twisted metal bits to fly around if the car were made of metal, instead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenorm
i think they said it was all the same alloy too, so that should simplify repairs a little bit.
audi's and jags have been all aluminum for the last little while. I think repair shops will be capable.
|
Aluminum cars are $$,$$$.$$ to fix when you have body or frame damage. Has to do with the riveting process used.
Then again, modern cars are already $,$$$.$$ to repair, aluminum or not. High-tensile strength steel, airbags, pre-tensioners...
Worst are the hoods with explosive bolts that pop-up to protect pedestrians... one of the local Jags had the bolts go off on the racetrack when the driver hit a traffic cone. An "accident" that would cost little more than a good buffing in another car (if it were needed at all) turned into a very expensive parts replacement affair...
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 01:54 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
The lightest current F150 is 4680 lb. 4x2, single cab, short bed, V6. 700 less than that puts it below 4000 lb. A Camaro SS weighs 3900 lb. For a truck with nearly a one-ton payload capacity (1700 lb in that config), that's mighty impressive.
|
Impressive in the wrong way, 'cause you're looking at it backwards. You OUGHT to be asking WTF a Camaro weighs 3900 pounds - double my Insight, or a Lotus Elise.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-18-2014, 10:58 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
I'm sure you have made a post on your LiFePo4 batteries, and I'm sure I've read it... what batteries did you go with, and how many? Do you use a BMS?
I'm considering LiFePo4 on my motorcycle where weight can really make a difference.
|
2 of the batteries are made with CR26250 cells. The original battery, the small one uses 20 cells, the second larger battery uses 28 cells.
Then the super battery uses eight AMP20 cells.
No BMS.
Here is the latest update to my LiFePO4 battery project:
DIY: BYOB, for more power, a lot less weight - Page 7 - Diesel Place : Chevrolet and GMC Diesel Truck Forums
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-19-2014, 02:07 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
lurker's apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942
PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab 90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
|
No fair. That was 44 years ago; 44 years of bureaucrats running amok adds up to a lot of weight.
|
|
|
01-19-2014, 02:23 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
lurker's apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942
PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab 90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
Impressive in the wrong way, 'cause you're looking at it backwards. You OUGHT to be asking WTF a Camaro weighs 3900 pounds - double my Insight, or a Lotus Elise.
|
Carp about modern vehicle weights all you like; they weigh what they weigh, and trimming 700 lbs. (seven hundred pounds!) is a significant accomplishment. Ford deserves praise for this move, not derision because the F150 is not a Lotus Elise.
Look at it this way. By shedding 700 lbs. from the best selling vehicle in the US -- not to mention offering 2 (two!) engines specifically targeting fuel economy -- Ford will be causing millions of gallons less fuel to be burned. That's a good thing no matter how you cut it.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wdb For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-19-2014, 02:31 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
Reverse-Trike EV
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Alameda, California
Posts: 146
Thanks: 2
Thanked 43 Times in 32 Posts
|
I'm considering an EV conversion for my Ford 150 with a couple of Leaf battery packs and a Tesla motor. There should be plenty of wrecked Tesla cars on the market, soon.
Here is an image of the Tesla pickup design.
|
|
|
01-19-2014, 02:41 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,501 Posts
|
Considering that aluminium is already widerly used to make work truck bodies, such as flatbeds and van bodies, I don't see too many reliability concerns. Regarding dents or any other minor damage, we can expect some redneck-engineering to fix it with Coke cans and Araldite
|
|
|
01-19-2014, 03:04 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
Reverse-Trike EV
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Alameda, California
Posts: 146
Thanks: 2
Thanked 43 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
|
|
|