01-23-2016, 04:01 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
|
2016 Cd 0.355 Focus RS
OOPS! should read Cd 0.355,not 0.255 (I wish we could edit titles!)
Ford gave their computers less Thalidomide and excreted the new Cd 0.355 FOCUS RS,which is less deformed than the 2015 Cd 0.387 FOCUS RS.
ALL-NEW FOCUS RS ROLLS OFF THE LINE IN GERMANY TO ARRIVE AT U.S. DEALERSHIPS THIS SPRING - Auto World News
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
01-23-2016, 04:11 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Furry Furfag
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
|
Wtf. .355, That thing is an aerodynamic brick!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Baltothewolf For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-23-2016, 04:54 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Well, you might compromise a little cd for down force when you're topping out at over 160 mph in it.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-23-2016, 05:44 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Does the 1.0L turbo eco Focus come in hatch bodystyle? I wonder how it compares...
PS: Phil your earlier typo (.255) sure caught my attention!  |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-23-2016, 05:56 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
|
typo
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Does the 1.0L turbo eco Focus come in hatch bodystyle? I wonder how it compares...
PS: Phil your earlier typo (.255) sure caught my attention! |
Yes,sorry,I've never figured how to correct a mistake in the title header. 
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
01-23-2016, 05:57 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
|
160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
Well, you might compromise a little cd for down force when you're topping out at over 160 mph in it.
|
I wish that market would vanish.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-23-2016, 06:44 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Growin a stash
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 818
Thanks: 417
Thanked 309 Times in 232 Posts
|
A funny story about how Ford made the intercooler too big, then covered it with a blanking plate from a van. I guess it helps Cd in a small way.
https://www.carthrottle.com/post/how...-was-too-cool/
__________________
2024 Chevy Bolt
Previous:
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ME_Andy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-23-2016, 09:57 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
Local media are reporting 25.8l/100km for the new RS. That's 9.1 MPG. Even considering that they were thrashing it (but included highway cruising), there's a limit to how fast you can go on a public road, so that's a truly dreadful figure.
On a closed circuit it was actually pretty economical at 43l/100km or 5.5MPG.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-24-2016, 07:09 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile
Local media are reporting 25.8l/100km for the new RS. That's 9.1 MPG. Even considering that they were thrashing it (but included highway cruising), there's a limit to how fast you can go on a public road, so that's a truly dreadful figure.
|
That's only truly dreadful driving. Everybody should understand, that this car is going to consume half of that or less when driven normally.
0,355 is not that bad factor for a car like Focus RS. A powerful hatchback will never be aerodynamically the most efficient car. Mercedes has introduced lately many aerodynamically efficient models and worked hard in this area. According to Mercedes their A45 AMG has a Cd value of 0,34. Not that much different from Focus.
|
|
|
|
|
