Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-06-2017, 04:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
2017 camaro vs 2011 cruze?

Hi,

I saw the 2017 camaro, with 2.0 Turbo engine, looks amazing!
I currently own a 2011 Chevrolet Cruze Eco, and get average of 32MPG.

It's really low for a cruze, and I think the main reason is that I'm either going below it's efficiency level (traffic, city speeds of 35MPH), or over (highways at 65+MPH).

On the highways, the cruze runs most efficient at between 50-55mph, where the engine runs at 2-2.25k RPM, and averages at 50-55MPG; but lowers at speeds over 60MPH to 45MPG or below.

I mostly ride at those speeds, with the avg ranges from 60-75MPH (sometimes peaking over 80MPH).

I was looking at the Camaro, hoping with it's taller gearing that I would get better gas mileage at least on the highways. The amount of travel I do, I was hoping to save a few bucks on gas, switching over.

Of course, I don't just buy a brand new Camaro, to save a few bucks of gas.
I am in love with the car, prefer it by far over the Mustang (Mustang always had a nicer interior than the camaro, but not anymore).

And now I'm just trying to justify a few more reasons to do the swap?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-06-2017, 05:31 PM   #2 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 7,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 786 Times in 695 Posts
I haven't seen the newer 4-cyl Camaro yet, but that 8-speed automatic might help even in city due to its quite wide gear spread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 05:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
In the fasting lane
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,648

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 51.36 mpg (US)

It - '09 Hyundai I10 Active Cool
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.58 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,988 Times in 1,274 Posts
If the choice is limited to just the Cruze and Camaro ignore this, otherwise and while not knowing your range I'd suggest a 4th gen Prius or Chevy Bolt if you can afford them, or a used Volt, 3rd gen Prius or any small engined Honda if TCO comes into play.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.16 Gmeter or 0.1 Mmile.



Most people are in the longest queue.

Last edited by RedDevil; 06-08-2017 at 04:32 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 08:49 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,048

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touareg TDI Sport AWD
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 165
Thanked 845 Times in 583 Posts
Last spring they had a manual Camaro Turbo at Dave Smith Motors brand new for about $21,000 (MSRP was about $28k). I believe that was only about $3000 more than their Cruise deal. I think that's a heck of a deal for a more basic Caddy ATS.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 09:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,191
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,521 Times in 1,122 Posts
Drag racing or MPG?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 09:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,533

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 164
Thanked 335 Times in 234 Posts
Keeping eco in mind, i would look at the 1.4 turbo in the cruze. The 2.0 turbo can make a lot of power, around 400hp, with stock internals. I'm sure it's plenty of fun, depends on your priorities.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 09:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Motor City
Posts: 248
Thanks: 0
Thanked 174 Times in 113 Posts
Real world numbers

I've put about 15,000 miles on a 2016 Camaro automatic 2.0 turbo (with the base tires) in the last year. It is capable of some relatively good fuel economy. It'll get ~35 MPG driving 70 on a windless day, and you can average over 40 going slower (it shifts into 8th gear at 44 MPH). It has really nice range with a 19 gallon tank, fantastic "one tank trip" car.

I haven't driven the older Cruze much, but spent a little time in a new hatch. It easily gets 5, if not 10, MPG more under the same conditions as the Camaro. Smaller motor, smaller car, smaller tires, it adds up and makes sense.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ennored For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (06-08-2017)
Old 06-07-2017, 11:56 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
8th gear at 45mph?
That's ridiculous!
The manual has 6 gears, and a 10% gearing difference, so probably around 40.
My 1.4liter turbo does 6th at 35 mph, but usually shifts at around 40.

I was kind of hoping that the engine would rev lower, since I'll be getting the manual.
That's a real turnoff for me. As well as the Camaro taking hi octane fuel.. no.. I'll stay with my Cruze.
Why is it that almost every car on the market shifts through the 6 gears at below 40?
And at 80 are revving close to their redline?

Thanks for the input, but it's a clear turnoff for me ��
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2017, 01:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 731 Times in 553 Posts
Shoot, son, I'm ten gears in, and reaching for the next just past fifteen mph.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (06-08-2017)
Old 06-07-2017, 02:09 PM   #10 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 856

Go Pod - '00 Honda Insight AC

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth
Thanks: 423
Thanked 440 Times in 286 Posts
Code:
		Tremec TR3160	Tremec TR6060	Hydra-Matic 8L45	Hydra-Matic 8L90
		6-speed manual	6-speed manual	8-speed automatic	8-speed automatic 
		(2.0T and 3.6L)	(6.2L)		(2.0L and 3.6L)		(6.2L)


First:		4.40		2.66		4.62			4.56
Second:		2.59		1.78		3.04			2.97
Third:		1.80		1.30		2.07			2.08
Fourth:		1.34		1.00		1.66			1.69
Fifth:		1.00		0.74		1.26			1.27
Sixth:		0.75		0.50		1.00			1.00
Seventh:	--		--		0.85			0.85
Eighth:		--		--		0.66			0.65
Reverse:	3.99		2.90		3.93			3.82
Final drive:	3.27		3.73		3.27 (2.0L)		2.77 
						2.77 (3.6L)
Looks like the ratio in top gear for the 6 speed is exactly halfway between 7th and 8th for the auto.

Not great :-/. Now if you could take a 6.2L 6 speed and swap in the final drive gearset from the T2.0L 6 speed, you're in business. Except that starting in 1st would be painful.


Last edited by samwichse; 06-07-2017 at 02:15 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com